Ravikumar Muthuswamy1, John M Corman2, Kathryn Dahl2, Gurkamal S Chatta3, Pawel Kalinski1,4,5,6. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Medicine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. 3. Department of Urology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington. 4. Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local infiltration of CD8(+) T cells (CTLs) in tumor lesions predicts overall clinical outcomes and the clinical benefit of cancer patients from immune checkpoint blockade. In the current study, we evaluated local production of different classes of chemokines in prostate cancer lesions, and the feasibility of their modulation to promote selective entry of CTLs into prostate tumors. METHODS: Chemokine expression in prostate cancer lesion was analyzed by TaqMan-based quantitative PCR, confocal fluorescence microscopy and ELISA. For ex vivo chemokine modulation analysis, prostate tumor explants from patients undergoing primary prostate cancer resections were cultured for 24 hr, in the absence or presence of the combination of poly-I:C, IFNα, and celecoxib (PAC). The numbers of cells producing defined chemokines in the tissues were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Chemotaxis of effector CD8(+) T cells towards the untreated and PAC-treated tumor explant supernatants were evaluated in a standard in vitro migration assays, using 24 well trans-well plates. The number of effector cells that migrated was enumerated by flow cytometry. Pearson (r) correlation was used for analyzing correlations between chemokines and immune filtrate, while paired two tailed students t-test was used for comparison between treatment groups. RESULTS: Prostate tumors showed uniformly low levels of CTL/NK/Th1-recruiting chemokines (CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10) but expressed high levels of chemokines implicated in the attraction of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells (Treg ): CCL2, CCL22, and CXCL12. Strong positive correlations were observed between CXCL9 and CXCL10 and local CD8 expression. Tumor expression levels of CCL2, CCL22, and CXCL12 were correlated with intratumoral expression of MDSC/Treg markers: FOXP3, CD33, and NCF2. Treatment with PAC suppressed intratumoral production of the Treg -attractant CCL22 and Treg /MDSC-attractant, CXCL12, while increasing the production of the CTL attractant, CXCL10. These changes in local chemokine production were accompanied by the reduced ability of the ex vivo-treated tumors to attract CD4(+) FOXP3(+) Treg cells, and strongly enhanced attraction of the CD8(+) Granzyme B(+) CTLs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the chemokine environment in prostate cancer can be reprogrammed to selectively enhance the attraction of type-1 effector immune cells and reduce local attraction of MDSCs and Tregs . Prostate 76:1095-1105, 2016.
BACKGROUND: Local infiltration of CD8(+) T cells (CTLs) in tumor lesions predicts overall clinical outcomes and the clinical benefit of cancerpatients from immune checkpoint blockade. In the current study, we evaluated local production of different classes of chemokines in prostate cancer lesions, and the feasibility of their modulation to promote selective entry of CTLs into prostate tumors. METHODS: Chemokine expression in prostate cancer lesion was analyzed by TaqMan-based quantitative PCR, confocal fluorescence microscopy and ELISA. For ex vivo chemokine modulation analysis, prostate tumor explants from patients undergoing primary prostate cancer resections were cultured for 24 hr, in the absence or presence of the combination of poly-I:C, IFNα, and celecoxib (PAC). The numbers of cells producing defined chemokines in the tissues were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Chemotaxis of effector CD8(+) T cells towards the untreated and PAC-treated tumor explant supernatants were evaluated in a standard in vitro migration assays, using 24 well trans-well plates. The number of effector cells that migrated was enumerated by flow cytometry. Pearson (r) correlation was used for analyzing correlations between chemokines and immune filtrate, while paired two tailed students t-test was used for comparison between treatment groups. RESULTS:Prostate tumors showed uniformly low levels of CTL/NK/Th1-recruiting chemokines (CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10) but expressed high levels of chemokines implicated in the attraction of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells (Treg ): CCL2, CCL22, and CXCL12. Strong positive correlations were observed between CXCL9 and CXCL10 and local CD8 expression. Tumor expression levels of CCL2, CCL22, and CXCL12 were correlated with intratumoral expression of MDSC/Treg markers: FOXP3, CD33, and NCF2. Treatment with PAC suppressed intratumoral production of the Treg -attractant CCL22 and Treg /MDSC-attractant, CXCL12, while increasing the production of the CTL attractant, CXCL10. These changes in local chemokine production were accompanied by the reduced ability of the ex vivo-treated tumors to attract CD4(+) FOXP3(+) Treg cells, and strongly enhanced attraction of the CD8(+) Granzyme B(+) CTLs. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the chemokine environment in prostate cancer can be reprogrammed to selectively enhance the attraction of type-1 effector immune cells and reduce local attraction of MDSCs and Tregs . Prostate 76:1095-1105, 2016.
Authors: Marie-Nicole Theodoraki; Saigopalakrishna Yerneni; Saumendra N Sarkar; Brian Orr; Ravikumar Muthuswamy; Jamie Voyten; Francesmary Modugno; Weijian Jiang; Melissa Grimm; Per H Basse; David L Bartlett; Robert P Edwards; Pawel Kalinski Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Robert P Edwards; Pawel Kalinski; Anda M Vlad; Brian Orr; Haider Mahdi; Yusi Fang; Mary Strange; Ibrahim Uygun; Mainpal Rana; Lixin Zhang; Adria Suarez Mora; Alexandra Pusateri; Esther Elishaev; Chaeryon Kang; George Tseng; William Gooding Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Carolyn J Loveridge; Ernest J Mui; Rachana Patel; Ee Hong Tan; Imran Ahmad; Michelle Welsh; Julie Galbraith; Ann Hedley; Colin Nixon; Karen Blyth; Owen Sansom; Hing Y Leung Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 12.701