Literature DB >> 27198977

The influence of health system organizational structure and culture on integration of health services: the example of HIV service monitoring in South Africa.

Mary Kawonga1, Duane Blaauw2, Sharon Fonn3.   

Abstract

Administrative integration of disease control programmes (DCPs) within the district health system has been a health sector reform priority in South Africa for two decades. The reforms entail district managers assuming authority for the planning and monitoring of DCPs in districts, with DCP managers providing specialist support. There has been little progress in achieving this, and a dearth of research exploring why. Using a case study of HIV programme monitoring and evaluation (M&E), this article explores whether South Africa's health system is configured to support administrative integration. The article draws on data from document reviews and interviews with 54 programme and district managers in two of nine provinces, exploring their respective roles in decision-making regarding HIV M&E system design and in using HIV data for monitoring uptake of HIV interventions in districts. Using Mintzberg's configurations framework, we describe three organizational parameters: (a) extent of centralization (whether district managers play a role in decisions regarding the design of the HIV M&E system); (b) key part of the organization (extent to which sub-national programme managers vs district managers play the central role in HIV monitoring in districts); and (c) coordination mechanisms used (whether highly formalized and rules-based or more output-based to promote agency). We find that the health system can be characterized as Mintzberg's machine bureaucracy. It is centralized and highly formalized with structures, management styles and practices that promote programme managers as lead role players in the monitoring of HIV interventions within districts. This undermines policy objectives of district managers assuming this leadership role. Our study enhances the understanding of organizational factors that may limit the success of administrative integration reforms and suggests interventions that may mitigate this.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decentralization; M&E; district health system; health services; integration; organizational culture; organizational structure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27198977     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  3 in total

1.  Prevalence, detection, treatment, and control of hypertension in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients attending HIV clinics in the Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Muyunda Mutemwa; Nasheeta Peer; Anniza de Villiers; Barbara Mukasa; Tandi E Matsha; Edward J Mills; Andre Pascal Kengne
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Strategies for supporting the implementation of a task-shared psychological intervention in South Africa's chronic disease services: qualitative insights from health managers' experiences of project MIND.

Authors:  Carrie Brooke-Sumner; Petal Petersen-Williams; Katherine Sorsdahl; James Kruger; Hassan Mahomed; Bronwyn Myers
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 2.996

3.  Organisational culture and the integrated chronic diseases management model implementation fidelity in South Africa: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Limakatso Lebina; Mary Kawonga; Olufunke Alaba; Natasha Khamisa; Kennedy Otwombe; Tolu Oni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.