Literature DB >> 27198683

Why Is Fractional Flow Reserve After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Not Always 1.0?

Pim A L Tonino1, Nils P Johnson2.   

Abstract

Keywords:  FFR; PCI; fractional flow reserve; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27198683     DOI： 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN： 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Association of Improvement in Fractional Flow Reserve With Outcomes, Including Symptomatic Relief, After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Stephane Fournier; Giovanni Ciccarelli; Gabor G Toth; Anastasios Milkas; Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

2.  Prospective Randomized Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Revascularization of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses: One-Month Results.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Leone; Francesco Burzotta; Cristina Aurigemma; Giovanni Luigi De Maria; Aniello Zambrano; Giuseppe Zimbardo; Manfredi Arioti; Emma Cerracchio; Rocco Vergallo; Carlo Trani; Filippo Crea
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Impact of Poststenting Fractional Flow Reserve on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes: The FFR-SEARCH Study.

Authors:  Roberto Diletti; Kaneshka Masdjedi; Joost Daemen; Laurens J C van Zandvoort; Tara Neleman; Jeroen Wilschut; Wijnand K Den Dekker; Rutger J van Bommel; Miguel Lemmert; Isabella Kardys; Paul Cummins; Peter de Jaegere; Felix Zijlstra; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.546
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.