Literature DB >> 27198010

Genome Sequence of Propionibacterium acidipropionici ATCC 55737.

Carlos H Luna-Flores1, Lars K Nielsen1, Esteban Marcellin2.   

Abstract

Propionibacterium acidipropionici produces propionic acid as its main fermentation product. Traditionally derived from fossil fuels, environmental and sustainable issues have revived the interest in producing propionic acid using biological resources. Here, we present the closed sequence of Propionibacterium acidipropionici ATCC 55737, an efficient propionic acid producer.
Copyright © 2016 Luna-Flores et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27198010      PMCID: PMC4888987          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00248-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Traditionally derived from fossil fuels, propionic acid (PA) is widely used as a preservative. Increasingly used in other industries, the PA market has grown 5.1% per annum to over 350,000 tonnes per year (1). Mounting environmental concerns have renewed interest in finding a sustainable alternative for its production, reviving interest in bacterial fermentation (2). Propionibacterium spp. are pleomorphic rod-shaped, Gram-positive bacteria that naturally produce PA as their main fermentation product through the Wood-Werkman cycle (2, 3). Recent economic and environmental assessments have called for PA volumetric productivities of 2 g/(liter·h), concentrations of 100 g/L, and yields of 0.6 g/g for an economically viable process (1, 4). Sequencing of new Propionibacterium spp. strains should contribute to achieving those targets. Previously, P. acidipropionici ATCC 4875 was sequenced (3). In this study, we sequenced P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737, selected from a collection of 17 strains (5). Sequencing was performed using PacBio and Illumina technologies as follows. DNA was extracted using a PureLink genomic DNA minikit (Invitrogen cat. no. K1820-01) and quantified using Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific) and Qubit (Life Technologies cat. no. Q32850). The quality of the DNA was determined by running a 1% agarose gel with the DNA gel stain SYBR safe (Life Technologies cat. no. S33102). The gel was visualized in a ChemiDoc MP system (Bio-Rad). The Illumina platform and the PacBio platforms were used for sequencing. The Illumina sequencing was performed using TrueSeq Illumina 300 paired-end. The library was prepared using the Illumina TrueSeq DNA HT sample preparation kit (Illumina cat. no. FC-121-2003). Reads were assembled using SPAdes (6). Genome closure was achieved using the PacBio RS II platform for sequencing. The PacBio library preparation was performed using the protocol for 20 kb selected with the BluePippin system. The chemistry used for sequencing was the release P6-C4. The sample was loaded using magnetic beads. The genome assembly was performed with the SMRT portal. This portal was also used to determine methylation sites across the genome. The Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server was used to annotate the assembled genome (7). P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 has a genome of 3.71 Mb, a GC content of 68.7%, 3,406 coding sequences, and 65 RNAs. P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 contains one plasmid with a genome size of 2,362 bp and a GC content of 67.69%. In order to determine genomic differences between P. acidipropionici ATCC 4875 (3) and P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 (this study), we performed a systematic genomic comparison. The genome size of the former strain is 3.66 Mb, which is 1.3% smaller than the newly sequenced strain. BLAST gene-gene comparison (8) showed that P. acidipropionici ATCC 4875 has 345 unique genes and that P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 has 423 unique genes (E value <0.0001). All the genes involved in PA production were conserved within 98% (E value <0.0001). Major changes between the two strains were observed for the subsystem “prophages.” P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 presents 30 prophage-associated proteins with a total size of 33,000 bp, whereas P. acidipropionici ATCC 4875 has only 17 prophage-associated proteins with a total size of 20,143 bp.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

Genome information for the chromosome and the plasmid of P. acidipropionici ATCC 55737 was deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers CP014352 and CP014353, respectively.
  7 in total

1.  BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  T A Tatusova; T L Madden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Economic and environmental assessment of propionic acid production by fermentation using different renewable raw materials.

Authors:  Pär Tufvesson; Anna Ekman; Roya R R Sardari; Kristina Engdahl; Linda Tufvesson
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  Microbial production of propionic acid from propionibacteria: current state, challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Long Liu; Yunfeng Zhu; Jianghua Li; Miao Wang; Pengsoon Lee; Guocheng Du; Jian Chen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 8.429

5.  Development of an industrializable fermentation process for propionic acid production.

Authors:  Chris C Stowers; Brad M Cox; Brandon A Rodriguez
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The genome sequence of Propionibacterium acidipropionici provides insights into its biotechnological and industrial potential.

Authors:  Lucas P Parizzi; Maria Carolina B Grassi; Luige A Llerena; Marcelo F Carazzolle; Verônica L Queiroz; Inês Lunardi; Ane F Zeidler; Paulo J P L Teixeira; Piotr Mieczkowski; Johana Rincones; Gonçalo A G Pereira
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Dairy propionibacteria as probiotics: recent evidences.

Authors:  Clelia Altieri
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Linking genotype and phenotype in an economically viable propionic acid biosynthesis process.

Authors:  Carlos H Luna-Flores; Chris C Stowers; Brad M Cox; Lars K Nielsen; Esteban Marcellin
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  A Pan-Genome Guided Metabolic Network Reconstruction of Five Propionibacterium Species Reveals Extensive Metabolic Diversity.

Authors:  Tim McCubbin; R Axayacatl Gonzalez-Garcia; Robin W Palfreyman; Chris Stowers; Lars K Nielsen; Esteban Marcellin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.