T Diana1, C Wüster2, M Kanitz1, G J Kahaly3. 1. Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. 2. Endocrine Practice, Mainz, Germany. 3. Molecular Thyroid Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg University (JGU) Medical Center, Mainz, Germany. kahaly@ukmainz.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: TSH-receptor (TSHR) antibodies (Ab) can be measured with binding or bio-assays. Sensitivity and specificity of five binding and two bio-assays were compared. METHODS: TSHR-blocking (TBAb) and TSHR-stimulating (TSAb) Ab were measured with reporter bio-assays. Blocking activity was defined as percent inhibition of luciferase expression relative to induction with bTSH alone. TSAb was reported as percentage of specimen-to-reference ratio (SRR%). TSHR-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) were measured with Kronus, Dynex, Kryptor, Cobas, and Immulite. RESULTS: Sixty patients with Graves' disease (GD), 20 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and 20 healthy controls (C) were included. C tested negative in all assays (specificity 100 %) while all 60 hyperthyroid GD patients tested positive in the TSAb bio-assay (sensitivity 100 %). Among these 60 GD patients, 20 had low TSAb positivity (SRR% 140-279), but were TBII positive in only 20 (100 %), 7 (35 %), 9 (45 %), 11 (55 %), and 18 (90 %) using the Kronus, Dynex, Kryptor, Cobas, and Immulite, respectively. In 20 moderate TSAb-positive (SRR% 280-420) patients, TBII tested positive in 20 (100 %), 14 (70 %), 13 (65 %), 16 (80 %), and 19 (95 %), respectively. The high (SRR% > 420) TSAb-positive patients were all TBII positive. All 20 hypothyroid HT patients tested TBAb positive (sensitivity 100 %) in the bio-assay while they tested TBII positive in 20 (100 %), 18 (90 %), 20, 20, and 18, respectively. Results obtained with two luminometers correlated for TSAb positive (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), TBAb positive (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), and C (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). None of the binding assays differentiated between TSAb and TBAb. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity is highly variable between binding and bio-assays for TSHR-Abs.
PURPOSE:TSH-receptor (TSHR) antibodies (Ab) can be measured with binding or bio-assays. Sensitivity and specificity of five binding and two bio-assays were compared. METHODS:TSHR-blocking (TBAb) and TSHR-stimulating (TSAb) Ab were measured with reporter bio-assays. Blocking activity was defined as percent inhibition of luciferase expression relative to induction with bTSH alone. TSAb was reported as percentage of specimen-to-reference ratio (SRR%). TSHR-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) were measured with Kronus, Dynex, Kryptor, Cobas, and Immulite. RESULTS: Sixty patients with Graves' disease (GD), 20 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT), and 20 healthy controls (C) were included. C tested negative in all assays (specificity 100 %) while all 60 hyperthyroid GDpatients tested positive in the TSAb bio-assay (sensitivity 100 %). Among these 60 GDpatients, 20 had low TSAb positivity (SRR% 140-279), but were TBII positive in only 20 (100 %), 7 (35 %), 9 (45 %), 11 (55 %), and 18 (90 %) using the Kronus, Dynex, Kryptor, Cobas, and Immulite, respectively. In 20 moderate TSAb-positive (SRR% 280-420) patients, TBII tested positive in 20 (100 %), 14 (70 %), 13 (65 %), 16 (80 %), and 19 (95 %), respectively. The high (SRR% > 420) TSAb-positive patients were all TBII positive. All 20 hypothyroid HTpatients tested TBAb positive (sensitivity 100 %) in the bio-assay while they tested TBII positive in 20 (100 %), 18 (90 %), 20, 20, and 18, respectively. Results obtained with two luminometers correlated for TSAb positive (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), TBAb positive (r = 0.88, p < 0.001), and C (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). None of the binding assays differentiated between TSAb and TBAb. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity is highly variable between binding and bio-assays for TSHR-Abs.
Authors: Rebecca S Bahn Chair; Henry B Burch; David S Cooper; Jeffrey R Garber; M Carol Greenlee; Irwin Klein; Peter Laurberg; I Ross McDougall; Victor M Montori; Scott A Rivkees; Douglas S Ross; Julie Ann Sosa; Marius N Stan Journal: Thyroid Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Tanja Diana; Yunsheng Li; Paul D Olivo; Karl J Lackner; Hannah Kim; Michael Kanitz; George J Kahaly Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Johannes J Leschik; Tanja Diana; Paul D Olivo; Jochem König; Ulrike Krahn; Yunsheng Li; Michael Kanitz; George J Kahaly Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Tanja Diana; Andreas Daiber; Matthias Oelze; Susanne Neumann; Paul D Olivo; Michael Kanitz; Paul Stamm; George J Kahaly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Terry J Smith; George J Kahaly; Daniel G Ezra; James C Fleming; Roger A Dailey; Rosa A Tang; Gerald J Harris; Alessandro Antonelli; Mario Salvi; Robert A Goldberg; James W Gigantelli; Steven M Couch; Erin M Shriver; Brent R Hayek; Eric M Hink; Richard M Woodward; Kathleen Gabriel; Guido Magni; Raymond S Douglas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tanja Diana; Christian Wüster; Paul D Olivo; Angelica Unterrainer; Jochem König; Michael Kanitz; Artur Bossowski; Brigitte Decallonne; George J Kahaly Journal: Eur Thyroid J Date: 2017-08-08