Literature DB >> 27197914

Pragmatic study designs for older adults with cancer: Report from the U13 conference.

Ryan D Nipp1, Nengliang Aaron Yao2, Lisa M Lowenstein3, Jan C Buckner4, Ira R Parker5, Ajeet Gajra6, Vicki A Morrison7, William Dale8, Karla V Ballman9.   

Abstract

Cancer is a disease occurring disproportionately in older adults. However, the evidence base regarding how best to care for these patients remains limited due to their underrepresentation in cancer clinical trials. Pragmatic clinical trials represent a promising approach for enhancing the evidence base in geriatric oncology by allowing investigators to enroll older, frailer patients onto cancer clinical trials. These trials are more accessible, less resource intensive, and place minimal additional burden on participating patients. Additionally, these trials can be designed to measure endpoints directly relevant to older adults, such as quality of life, functional independence and treatment tolerability which are often not addressed in standard clinical trials. Therefore, pragmatic clinical trials allow researchers to include patients for whom the treatment will ultimately be applied and to utilize meaningful endpoints. Examples of pragmatic studies include both large, simple trials and cluster randomized trials. These study designs allow investigators to conduct clinical trials within the context of everyday practice. Further, researchers can devise these studies to place minimal burden on the patient, the treating clinicians and the participating institutions. In order to be successful, pragmatic trials must efficiently utilize the electronic medical record for data capture while also maximizing patient recruitment, enrollment and retention. Additionally, by strategically utilizing pragmatic clinical trials to test therapies and interventions that have previously shown efficacy in younger, fitter patients, these trials represent a potential mechanism to improve the evidence base in geriatric oncology and enhance care for older adults with cancer.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Cancer; Clinical Trial; Frail Older Adults; Geriatrics; Pragmatic Clinical Trials; Quality of Life

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197914     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol        ISSN: 1879-4068            Impact factor:   3.599


  15 in total

1.  Considerations for clinical trial design in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Enrique Soto-Perez-De-Celis; Stuart M Lichtman
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.206

2.  Impact of Age on Outcomes with Immunotherapy for Patients with Melanoma.

Authors:  Allison S Betof; Ryan D Nipp; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Romany A N Johnpulle; Krista Rubin; Samuel M Rubinstein; Keith T Flaherty; Donald P Lawrence; Douglas B Johnson; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-05-05

3.  Geriatric oncology health services research: Cancer and Aging Research Group infrastructure core.

Authors:  Melisa L Wong; Stuart M Lichtman; Gary R Morrow; John Simmons; Tomma Hargraves; Cary P Gross; Jennifer L Lund; Lisa M Lowenstein; Louise C Walter; Cara L McDermott; Supriya G Mohile; Harvey Jay Cohen
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 4.  Arti Hurria and the progress in integrating the geriatric assessment into oncology: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper.

Authors:  Clark DuMontier; Mina S Sedrak; Wee Kheng Soo; Cindy Kenis; Grant R Williams; Kristen Haase; Magnus Harneshaug; Hira Mian; Kah Poh Loh; Siri Rostoft; William Dale; Harvey Jay Cohen
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Pilot Randomized Trial of a Transdisciplinary Geriatric and Palliative Care Intervention for Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Brandon Temel; Charn-Xin Fuh; Paul Kay; Sophia Landay; Daniel Lage; Esteban Franco-Garcia; Erin Scott; Erin Stevens; Terrence O'Malley; Supriya Mohile; William Dale; Lara Traeger; Ardeshir Z Hashmi; Vicki Jackson; Joseph A Greer; Areej El-Jawahri; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 6.  From Assessment to Implementation and Beyond in Cancer and Aging Research.

Authors:  Stuart M Lichtman; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman Muss; William P Tew; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 7.  Convergence of Geriatrics and Palliative Care to Deliver Personalized Supportive Care for Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Matthew Loscalzo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 50.717

8.  Behavioral, psychological, and supportive care interventions in geriatric oncology: The Cancer and Aging Research Group infrastructure core.

Authors:  Rawad Elias; Kah Poh Loh; Valerie Targia; Mary Whitehead; Beverly Canin; Aminah Jatoi; Matthew Loscalzo; Supriya Mohile
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Quality of Life in Vulnerable Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy-The Randomized NORDIC9-Study.

Authors:  Gabor Liposits; Henrik Rode Eshøj; Sören Möller; Stine Brændegaard Winther; Halla Skuladottir; Jesper Ryg; Eva Hofsli; Carl-Henrik Shah; Laurids Østergaard Poulsen; Åke Berglund; Camilla Qvortrup; Pia Österlund; Bengt Glimelius; Halfdan Sorbye; Per Pfeiffer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group.

Authors:  Allison Magnuson; Suanna S Bruinooge; Harpreet Singh; Keith D Wilner; Shadia Jalal; Stuart M Lichtman; Paul G Kluetz; Gary H Lyman; Heidi D Klepin; Mark E Fleury; Brad Hirsch; Allen Melemed; Fernanda I Arnaldez; Upal Basu Roy; Caroline Schenkel; Shimere Sherwood; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 13.801

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.