Literature DB >> 27197286

Inflammatory-Related Genetic Variants in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Prognosis: A Multimarker Bayesian Assessment.

Alexandra Masson-Lecomte1, Evangelina López de Maturana2, Michael E Goddard3, Antoni Picornell2, Marta Rava2, Anna González-Neira4, Mirari Márquez2, Alfredo Carrato5, Adonina Tardon6, Josep Lloreta7, Montserrat Garcia-Closas8, Debra Silverman9, Nathaniel Rothman9, Manolis Kogevinas10, Yves Allory11, Stephen J Chanock9, Francisco X Real12, Núria Malats13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence points to the role of tumor immunologic environment on urothelial bladder cancer prognosis. This effect might be partly dependent on the host genetic context. We evaluated the association of SNPs in inflammation-related genes with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) risk-of-recurrence and risk-of-progression.
METHODS: We considered 822 NMIBC included in the SBC/EPICURO Study followed-up >10 years. We selected 1,679 SNPs belonging to 251 inflammatory genes. The association of SNPs with risk-of-recurrence and risk-of-progression was assessed using Cox regression single-marker (SMM) and multimarker methods (MMM) Bayes A and Bayesian LASSO. Discriminative abilities of the models were calculated using the c index and validated with bootstrap cross-validation procedures.
RESULTS: While no SNP was found to be associated with risk-of-recurrence using SMM, three SNPs in TNIP1, CD5, and JAK3 showed very strong association with posterior probabilities >90% using MMM. Regarding risk-of-progression, one SNP in CD3G was significantly associated using SMM (HR, 2.69; P = 1.55 × 10(-5)) and two SNPs in MASP1 and AIRE, showed a posterior probability ≥80% with MMM. Validated discriminative abilities of the models without and with the SNPs were 58.4% versus 60.5% and 72.1% versus 72.8% for risk-of-recurrence and risk-of-progression, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Using innovative analytic approaches, we demonstrated that SNPs in inflammatory-related genes were associated with NMIBC prognosis and that they improve the discriminative ability of prognostic clinical models for NMIBC. IMPACT: This study provides proof of concept for the joint effect of genetic variants in improving the discriminative ability of clinical prognostic models. The approach may be extended to other diseases. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1144-50. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197286      PMCID: PMC6984594          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  48 in total

Review 1.  Optimal effective population size for the global population of black and white dairy cattle.

Authors:  M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Select your SNPs (SYSNPs): a web tool for automatic and massive selection of SNPs.

Authors:  Belén Lorente-Galdos; Ignacio Medina; Carlos Morcillo-Suarez; Txema Heredia; Angel Carreño-Torres; Ricardo Sangrós; Josep Alegre; Guillermo Pita; Gemma Vellalta; Nuria Malats; David G Pisano; Joaquín Dopazo; Arcadi Navarro
Journal:  Int J Data Min Bioinform       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.667

3.  Activation of cytokine-producing and antitumor activities of natural killer cells and macrophages by engagement of Toll-like and NOD-like receptors.

Authors:  Fu Qiu; Amudhan Maniar; Marco Quevedo Diaz; Andrei I Chapoval; Andrei E Medvedev
Journal:  Innate Immun       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.680

Review 4.  Role of NOD1/CARD4 and NOD2/CARD15 gene polymorphisms in cancer etiology.

Authors:  Anton G Kutikhin
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.850

5.  Association between C13ORF31, NOD2, RIPK2 and TLR10 polymorphisms and urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Macarena Guirado; Hernani Gil; Pablo Saenz-Lopez; Jennifer Reinboth; Federico Garrido; José Manuel Cozar; Francisco Ruiz-Cabello; Rafael Carretero
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.850

Review 6.  EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013.

Authors:  Marko Babjuk; Maximilian Burger; Richard Zigeuner; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bas W G van Rhijn; Eva Compérat; Richard J Sylvester; Eero Kaasinen; Andreas Böhle; Joan Palou Redorta; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Aire-dependent thymic development of tumor-associated regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Sven Malchow; Daniel S Leventhal; Saki Nishi; Benjamin I Fischer; Lynn Shen; Gladell P Paner; Ayelet S Amit; Chulho Kang; Jenna E Geddes; James P Allison; Nicholas D Socci; Peter A Savage
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Bladder cancer SNP panel predicts susceptibility and survival.

Authors:  Angeline S Andrew; Jiang Gui; Arthur C Sanderson; Rebecca A Mason; Elaine V Morlock; Alan R Schned; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit; Jason H Moore; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  A multi-stage genome-wide association study of bladder cancer identifies multiple susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Nathaniel Rothman; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Nuria Malats; Xifeng Wu; Jonine D Figueroa; Francisco X Real; David Van Den Berg; Giuseppe Matullo; Dalsu Baris; Michael Thun; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Paolo Vineis; Immaculata De Vivo; Demetrius Albanes; Mark P Purdue; Thorunn Rafnar; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Anne E Kiltie; Olivier Cussenot; Klaus Golka; Rajiv Kumar; Jack A Taylor; Jose I Mayordomo; Kevin B Jacobs; Manolis Kogevinas; Amy Hutchinson; Zhaoming Wang; Yi-Ping Fu; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Laurie Burdett; Meredith Yeager; William Wheeler; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Reina García-Closas; Josep Lloreta; Alison Johnson; Molly Schwenn; Margaret R Karagas; Alan Schned; Gerald Andriole; Robert Grubb; Amanda Black; Eric J Jacobs; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; Stephanie J Weinstein; Jarmo Virtamo; Victoria K Cortessis; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Malcolm C Pike; Mariana C Stern; Jian-Min Yuan; David J Hunter; Monica McGrath; Colin P Dinney; Bogdan Czerniak; Meng Chen; Hushan Yang; Sita H Vermeulen; Katja K Aben; J Alfred Witjes; Remco R Makkinje; Patrick Sulem; Soren Besenbacher; Kari Stefansson; Elio Riboli; Paul Brennan; Salvatore Panico; Carmen Navarro; Naomi E Allen; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Neil Caporaso; Maria Teresa Landi; Federico Canzian; Borje Ljungberg; Anne Tjonneland; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; David T Bishop; Mark T W Teo; Margaret A Knowles; Simonetta Guarrera; Silvia Polidoro; Fulvio Ricceri; Carlotta Sacerdote; Alessandra Allione; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Silvia Selinski; Jan G Hengstler; Holger Dietrich; Tony Fletcher; Peter Rudnai; Eugen Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Sophia C E Bolick; Ashley Godfrey; Zongli Xu; José I Sanz-Velez; María D García-Prats; Manuel Sanchez; Gabriel Valdivia; Stefano Porru; Simone Benhamou; Robert N Hoover; Joseph F Fraumeni; Debra T Silverman; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genome-wide association study yields variants at 20p12.2 that associate with urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Thorunn Rafnar; Patrick Sulem; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Sita H Vermeulen; Hannes Helgason; Jona Saemundsdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Simon N Stacey; Julius Gudmundsson; Hrefna Johannsdottir; Kristin Alexiusdottir; Vigdis Petursdottir; Sigfus Nikulasson; Gudmundur Geirsson; Thorvaldur Jonsson; Katja K H Aben; Anne J Grotenhuis; Gerald W Verhaegh; Aleksandra M Dudek; J Alfred Witjes; Antoine G van der Heijden; Alina Vrieling; Tessel E Galesloot; Ana De Juan; Angeles Panadero; Fernando Rivera; Carolyn Hurst; D Timothy Bishop; Sei C Sak; Ananya Choudhury; Mark T W Teo; Cecilia Arici; Angela Carta; Elena Toninelli; Petra de Verdier; Peter Rudnai; Eugene Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Kirstin A van der Keur; Irene Lurkin; Mieke Goossens; Eliane Kellen; Simonetta Guarrera; Alessia Russo; Rossana Critelli; Carlotta Sacerdote; Paolo Vineis; Clémentine Krucker; Maurice P Zeegers; Holger Gerullis; Daniel Ovsiannikov; Frank Volkert; Jan G Hengstler; Silvia Selinski; Olafur T Magnusson; Gisli Masson; Augustine Kong; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Annika Lindblom; Ellen Zwarthoff; Stefano Porru; Klaus Golka; Frank Buntinx; Giuseppe Matullo; Rajiv Kumar; José I Mayordomo; D Gunnar Steineck; Anne E Kiltie; Eirikur Jonsson; François Radvanyi; Margaret A Knowles; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of a custom next-generation sequencing panel for the determination of bladder cancer risk in a Tunisian cohort.

Authors:  Imen Hemissi; Sami Boussetta; Hamza Dallali; Faycel Hellal; Geoffroy Durand; Catherine Voegele; Haroun Ayed; Selim Zaghbib; Zeineb Naimi; Mouna Ayadi; Mohamed Chebil; James Mckay; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Slah Ouerhani
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Impact of Occupational Exposures and Genetic Polymorphisms on Recurrence and Progression of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Angela Carta; Sofia Pavanello; Giuseppe Mastrangelo; Ugo Fedeli; Cecilia Arici; Stefano Porru
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Identification of Prognosis-Related Genes in Bladder Cancer Microenvironment across TCGA Database.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Yu Tang; Haoyu Ren; Yi Lei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.