Literature DB >> 27197021

Determinants of bird conservation-action implementation and associated population trends of threatened species.

David A Luther1, Thomas M Brooks2, Stuart H M Butchart3, Matt W Hayward4, Marieke E Kester5, John Lamoreux6, Amy Upgren7.   

Abstract

Conservation actions, such as habitat protection, attempt to halt the loss of threatened species and help their populations recover. The efficiency and the effectiveness of actions have been examined individually. However, conservation actions generally occur simultaneously, so the full suite of implemented conservation actions should be assessed. We used the conservation actions underway for all threatened and near-threatened birds of the world (International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species) to assess which biological (related to taxonomy and ecology) and anthropogenic (related to geoeconomics) factors were associated with the implementation of different classes of conservation actions. We also assessed which conservation actions were associated with population increases in the species targeted. Extinction-risk category was the strongest single predictor of the type of conservation actions implemented, followed by landmass type (continent, oceanic island, etc.) and generation length. Species targeted by invasive nonnative species control or eradication programs, ex situ conservation, international legislation, reintroduction, or education, and awareness-raising activities were more likely to have increasing populations. These results illustrate the importance of developing a predictive science of conservation actions and the relative benefits of each class of implemented conservation action for threatened and near-threatened birds worldwide.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  IUCN Red List; Lista Roja UICN; acciones de conservación; aves; birds; conservation actions; conservation planning; extinction risk; planificación de la conservación; riesgo de extinción

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27197021     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

Authors:  Sophie M E Marsh; Michael Hoffmann; Neil D Burgess; Thomas M Brooks; Daniel W S Challender; Patricia J Cremona; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Flore Lafaye de Micheaux; Gabriela Lichtenstein; Dilys Roe; Monika Böhm
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 7.563

2.  How much does it cost to save a species from extinction? Costs and rewards of conserving the Lear's macaw.

Authors:  Antonio E A Barbosa; José L Tella
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Rapid loss of flight in the Aldabra white-throated rail.

Authors:  Janske van de Crommenacker; Nancy Bunbury; Hazel A Jackson; Lisa J Nupen; Ross Wanless; Frauke Fleischer-Dogley; Jim J Groombridge; Ben H Warren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Near-term ecological forecasting for dynamic aeroconservation of migratory birds.

Authors:  Kyle G Horton; Benjamin M Van Doren; Heidi J Albers; Andrew Farnsworth; Daniel Sheldon
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 7.563

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.