| Literature DB >> 27196922 |
Li Xu1,2, Shanshan Cao3,4, Jihua Wang5,6, Anxiang Lu7,8.
Abstract
Agricultural soil is typically an important component of urban ecosystems, contributing directly or indirectly to the general quality of human life. To understand which factors influence metal accumulation in agricultural soils in urban ecosystems is becoming increasingly important. Land use, soil type and urbanization indicators all account for considerable differences in metal accumulation in agricultural soils, and the interactions between these factors on metal concentrations were also examined. Results showed that Zn, Cu, and Cd concentrations varied significantly among different land use types. Concentrations of all metals, except for Cd, were higher in calcareous cinnamon soil than in fluvo-aquic soil. Expansion distance and road density were adopted as urbanization indicators, and distance from the urban center was significantly negatively correlated with concentrations of Hg, and negatively correlated with concentrations of Zn, and road density was positively correlated with Cd concentrations. Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that Hg concentration was significantly influenced by the four-way interaction among all factors. The results in this study provide basic data to support the management of agricultural soils and to help policy makers to plan ahead in Beijing.Entities:
Keywords: heavy metal; interaction; land use; soil type; urbanization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27196922 PMCID: PMC4881135 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13050510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The agricultural soil sampling sites in the Beijing.
Basic descriptive data of heavy metals in agricultural soils in the Beijing.
| Min | Max | Mean | Range | Skew | Kurt | CV a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | 4.05 | 18.3 | 8.38 | 14.2 | 0.98 | 3.43 | 24.3 |
| Cd | 0.06 | 0.77 | 0.19 | 0.71 | 3.12 | 14.2 | 50.3 |
| Cu | 8.40 | 49.8 | 24.4 | 41.4 | 0.97 | 1.18 | 28.4 |
| Hg | 0.01 | 0.67 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 5.18 | 32.7 | 112 |
| Ni | 9.60 | 36.4 | 24.5 | 26.8 | 0.00 | −0.04 | 19.5 |
| Pb | 5.10 | 42.7 | 22.5 | 37.6 | 0.02 | −0.84 | 39.1 |
| Zn | 32.9 | 260 | 75.0 | 227 | 3.53 | 21.8 | 33.4 |
| pH | 6.28 | 8.34 | 7.65 | 2.06 | −1.17 | 1.53 | 5.10 |
a CV: Coefficient of Variation (%).
Correlations between heavy metals concentions and urbanization indicator.
| Urbanization | Statistical Items | As | Cd | Cu | Hg | Ni | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance from urban center | Correlation coefficient | 0.16 | −0.16 | −0.06 | −0.35 ** | −0.08 | −0.15 | −0.21 * |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.02 | |
| Road density | Correlation coefficient | −0.02 | 0.20 * | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.86 | 0.02 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.77 |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
ANOVA of heavy metals for different land uses in the agricultural soil.
| As | Cd | Cu | Hg | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 2.18 | 4.72 | 3.44 | 0.69 | 2.19 | 1.27 | 6.66 |
| Significance | 0.09 | 0.01 * | 0.02 * | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.00 * |
* Significance level of 0.05.
Figure 2Heavy metals concentration in soils from different land use in soil (mg·kg−1). Land uses followed by different letters (a, b, c) are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Soil types in the study area.
Metal concentrations in different soil types in the agricultural soil.
| Soil Type | N | Parameter | As | Cd | Cu | Hg | Ni | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAS | 100 | Min | 4.32 | 0.09 | 8.40 | 0.01 | 9.60 | 5.10 | 32.9 |
| Max | 12.9 | 0.77 | 43.9 | 0.58 | 43.8 | 39.5 | 159 | ||
| Mean | 8.30 | 0.20 | 23.8 | 0.07 | 24.4 | 22.4 | 73.4 | ||
| SD | 1.72 | 0.10 | 6.93 | 0.06 | 4.68 | 8.72 | 21.2 | ||
| Background value of FAS a | - | - | 9.7 | 0.10 | 24.1 | 0.05 | 23.7 | 21.9 | 71.1 |
| CCS | 34 | Min | 4.05 | 0.08 | 13.6 | 0.01 | 13.9 | 9.20 | 47.2 |
| Max | 18.3 | 0.31 | 43.8 | 0.67 | 36.4 | 42.7 | 260 | ||
| Mean | 8.61 | 0.16 | 26.2 | 0.09 | 24.9 | 22.6 | 79.9 | ||
| SD | 2.80 | 0.06 | 6.71 | 0.12 | 4.82 | 8.50 | 35.6 | ||
| Background value of CCS a | - | - | 11.6 | 0.10 | 24.3 | 0.04 | 23.9 | 21.3 | 74.1 |
a Background value: the background value of metals for two soil type were from [36].
Multivariate ANOVA results for heavy metals in agricultural soils.
| Group | Statistical Items | As | Cd | Cu | Hg | Ni | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 * F2 | F | 2.55 | 1.68 | 1.27 | 0.33 | 1.45 | 0.45 | 6.45 |
| Significance | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.72 | 0.24 | 0.64 | 0.00 | |
| F1 * F3 | F | 1.43 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 1.67 | 1.56 | 1.43 | 0.63 |
| Significance | 0.24 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.60 | |
| F1 * F4 | F | 5.61 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 5.28 | 1.90 | 1.96 | 0.78 |
| Significance | 0.01 | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.46 | |
| F2 * F3 | F | 0.84 | 0.06 | 3.13 | 7.05 | 1.24 | 2.53 | 3.27 |
| Significance | 0.36 | 0.82 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.07 | |
| F2 * F4 | F | 9.97 | 1.08 | 3.59 | 2.36 | 3.34 | 0.55 | 0.10 |
| Significance | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.46 | 0.75 | |
| F3 * F4 | F | 0.04 | 0.01 | 2.07 | 1.30 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 4.25 |
| Significance | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.96 | 0.04 | |
| F1 * F2 * F3 | F | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.29 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 2.88 | 3.76 |
| Significance | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.74 | 0.09 | 0.06 | |
| F1 * F2 * F4 | F | 4.66 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 4.43 | 0.54 | 0.07 | 0.49 |
| Significance | 0.03 | 0.98 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.49 | |
| F1 * F3 * F4 | F | 0.56 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 4.62 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 4.89 |
| Significance | 0.46 | 0.95 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 0.03 | |
| F2 * F3 * F4 | F | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.38 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 1.83 | 3.43 |
| Significance | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.18 | 0.07 | |
| F1 * F2 * F3 * F4 | F | 0.06 | 1.56 | 0.94 | 11.21 | 0.03 | 2.32 | 2.34 |
| Significance | 0.81 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 0.13 | 0.13 |
* Significance level of 0.05; F1: Land use; F2: Soil type; F3: Road density; F4: Distance from urban center.