Literature DB >> 27196261

Community-Based Assessment to Inform a Chlamydia Screening Program for Women in a Rural American Indian Community.

Lucy Smartlowit-Briggs1, Cynthia Pearson, Patricia Whitefoot, Bianca N Altamirano, Michelle Womack, Marie Bastin, Julia C Dombrowski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of chlamydial infection in American Indian/Alaska Native women in the United States are approximately 4-fold those in non-Hispanic white women. We conducted a community-based survey of self-identified American Indian/Alaska Native women 14 to 25 years of age on a reservation in the Northwestern United States to inform a chlamydia screening strategy.
METHODS: The anonymous survey assessed respondents' knowledge, perceptions, and preferences related to chlamydia screening, results receipt, and partner notification. We recruited women using respondent-driven sampling, school-based sampling, and direct recruitment through social media and fliers. Participants in schools completed the survey as a paper-based, self-administered survey. Other participants could complete the survey in person, by phone as an interviewer-administered survey, or online.
RESULTS: We recruited 162 participants, most in schools (n = 83; 51%) or by peer referral (n = 55; 34%). Only 1 woman completed the survey online. Thirty-one respondents (19%) reported a history of an unplanned first pregnancy, and 19 (12%) reported a history of a diagnosed sexually transmitted disease. Most women (n = 98; 63%) recognized the potential impact of Chlamydia trachomatis on fertility. The preferred site for chlamydia screening was the Indian Health Service Clinic (n = 114; 70%), but 79 women (41%) would accept a C. trachomatis test at a nonclinical testing site. Of the 56 women (35%) who would accept home testing, most preferred to get the test kit from a clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Indian Health Service efforts to increase chlamydia screening in the clinic and through outreach may be more successful than promotion of home testing in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27196261      PMCID: PMC5446671          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  19 in total

1.  Identifying opportunities for chlamydia screening among American Indian women.

Authors:  Melanie M Taylor; Brigg Reilley; Scott Tulloch; Michelle Winscott; Anthony Dunnigan; Marie Russell; John T Redd
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Disparities in sexually transmitted disease rates across the "eight Americas".

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Charlotte K Kent; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Jami S Leichliter; Sevgi O Aral
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  "No one's at home and they won't pick up the phone": using the Internet and text messaging to enhance partner services in North Carolina.

Authors:  Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Steve Beagle; Emily Pike; Joann Kuruc; Peter Leone; Victoria Mobley; Evelyn Foust; Cynthia Gay
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Evaluation of a new website design for iwantthekit for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomonas screening.

Authors:  Margaret Kuder; Mary Jett Goheen; Laura Dize; Mathilda Barnes; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Patterns of chlamydia/gonorrhea positivity among voluntarily screened New York City public high school students.

Authors:  Jessica S Han; Meighan E Rogers; Sophia Nurani; Steven Rubin; Susan Blank
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  How do changes in the population tested for chlamydia over time affect observed trends in chlamydia positivity? Analysis of routinely collected data from young women tested for chlamydia in family planning clinics in the Pacific Northwest (USA), between 2003 and 2010.

Authors:  Sarah C Woodhall; Lizzi Torrone; David Fine; Sarah G Salomon; Wendy Nakatsukasa-Ono; Kate Soldan; Hillard Weinstock
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 7.  Testing for chlamydial and gonorrheal infections outside of clinic settings: a summary of the literature.

Authors:  Carol A Ford; Claire I Viadro; William C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Self-administered sample collection for screening of sexually transmitted infection among reservation-based American Indian youth.

Authors:  Lauren Tingey; Rachel Strom; Ranelda Hastings; Anthony Parker; Allison Barlow; Anne Rompalo; Charlotte Gaydos
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 1.359

9.  Uptake and population-level impact of expedited partner therapy (EPT) on Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: the Washington State community-level randomized trial of EPT.

Authors:  Matthew R Golden; Roxanne P Kerani; Mark Stenger; James P Hughes; Mark Aubin; Cheryl Malinski; King K Holmes
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Muhammad S Jamil; Jane S Hocking; Heidi M Bauer; Hammad Ali; Handan Wand; Kirsty Smith; Jennifer Walker; Basil Donovan; John M Kaldor; Rebecca J Guy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Sexually Transmitted Infection Epidemiology and Care in Rural Areas: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Wiley D Jenkins; Leslie D Williams; William S Pearson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 2.  Collateral Damage: A Narrative Review on Epidemics of Substance Use Disorders and Their Relationships to Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States.

Authors:  Steffanie Ann Strathdee; Claire C Bristow; Tommi Gaines; Steven Shoptaw
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Predictors of STD Screening From the Indigenist Stress-Coping Model Among Native Adults With Binge Substance Use.

Authors:  Maya Magarati; Rachel Strom Chambers; Gayane Yenokyan; Summer Rosenstock; Melissa Walls; Anna Slimp; Francene Larzelere; Angelita Lee; Laura Pinal; Lauren Tingey
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-12

4.  Protecting our future generation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a sexual health self-care intervention with Native American youth and young adults.

Authors:  Tingey Lauren; Sutcliffe Catherine; Chambers Rachel; Patel Hima; Lee Angelita; Lee Shauntel; Melgar Laura; Slimp Anna; Rompalo Anne; Craig Mariddie; Gaydos Charlotte
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.