Literature DB >> 27195741

Ramp Study Hemodynamics, Functional Capacity, and Outcome in Heart Failure Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Mette H Jung1, Finn Gustafsson, Brian Houston, Stuart D Russell.   

Abstract

Ramp studies-measuring changes in cardiac parameters as a function of serial pump speed changes (revolutions per minute [rpm])-are increasingly used to evaluate function and malfunction of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). We hypothesized that ramp studies can predict functional capacity, quality of life (QOL), and survival in CF-LVAD patients. Hemodynamic changes per Δrpm were measured at a minimum of CF-LVAD support, at baseline pump speed, and at maximal tolerable pump speed. Subsequently functional capacity and QOL were assessed. Eighty ramp tests were performed in 44 patients (HeartMate II, Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA). Functional status was evaluated in 70% (31/44); average 6 minute walk test (6MWT) was 312 ± 220 min, New York Heart Association (NYHA) I-II/III-IV (70/30%) and activity scores very low-low/moderate-very high (55/45%). Decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure per Δrpm was related to better NYHA classification; NYHA I-II vs. III-IV, -0.29 ± 0.15 vs. -0.09 ± 0.16 mm Hg/rpm * 10 (p = 0.007) as well as to activity score; very low-low vs. moderate-very high, -0.16 ± 0.16 vs. -0.31 ± 0.16 mm Hg/rpm * 10 (p = 0.02). Cardiac output change per Δrpm was correlated to measures of QOL. Ramp tests did not predict survival. In conclusion, hemodynamic changes during ramp studies are associated with measures of functional capacity and QOL. Hence, such tests could potentially identify patients in risk of failure to thrive during CF-LVAD support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27195741     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Primer for the Non-Mechanical Circulatory Support Provider.

Authors:  Gregory S Troutman; Michael V Genuardi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  How to Optimize Patient Selection and Device Performance of the Newest Generation Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Chonyang L Albert; Jerry D Estep
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-08-07

4.  Cannula and Pump Positions Are Associated With Left Ventricular Unloading and Clinical Outcome in Patients With HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Sirtaz Adatya; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Daniel Rodgers; Gabriel Sayer; Nitasha Sarswat; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Colleen Juricek; Diego Medvedofsky; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Roberto Lang; Jerry D Estep; Daniel Burkhoff; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Hemodynamic Effects of Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery and Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Jerry Nnanabu; Daniel Rodgers; Jayant Raikehlkar; Sara Kalantar; Bryan Smith; Ann Nguyen; Ben Chung; Nikhil Narang; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Daniel Burkhoff; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gene Kim; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.826

6.  Novel Left Heart Catheterization Ramp Protocol to Guide Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Supported With Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Authors:  Andrew N Rosenbaum; Robert P Frantz; Sudhir S Kushwaha; John M Stulak; Simon Maltais; Atta Behfar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.