| Literature DB >> 27195700 |
Alicia S Miller, Gary R Shepherd, Paula S Fratantoni.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147627.].Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27195700 PMCID: PMC4873133 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 4Generalized additive model (GAM) plots identifying estimated effects of smoothed covariates on NEFSC spring survey catch of juvenile black sea bass.
The magnitude of the y axis indicates the relative importance of each covariate with the effective degrees of freedom for the smoother denoted in the y axis label. Shaded areas represent 2 SE confidence intervals. Rugplots along the x-axis reflect the relative density of data points.
Fig 6Annual mean catch (n) per tow of black sea bass on the NEFSC spring survey.
Data is constrained to survey strata used in the stock assessment. Solid black lines represent model predicted values with 2 standard error confidence intervals shown by the grey surrounding areas. Empirical mean catch of the raw data is denoted by a dotted line.
Fig 5Generalized additive model (GAM) plots identifying estimated effects of smoothed covariates on NEFSC spring survey catch of adult black sea bass.
The magnitude of the y axis indicates the relative importance of each covariate with the effective degrees of freedom for the smoother denoted in the y axis label. Shaded areas represent 2 SE confidence intervals. Rugplots along the x-axis reflect the relative density of data points.