Literature DB >> 27195644

Back Pain and Neuraxial Anesthesia.

Honorio T Benzon1, Yogen G Asher, Craig T Hartrick.   

Abstract

The incidence of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia in the adult population is not different from that after general anesthesia. The pain is usually mild, localized in the low back, rarely radiates to the lower extremities, and has a duration of only a few days. The risk factors for development of back pain include the lithotomy position, multiple attempts at block placement, duration of surgery longer than 2.5 hours, body mass index ≥32 kg/m, and a history of back pain. However, there is no permanent worsening of preexisting back pain after neuraxial anesthesia. The back pain has been attributed to tears in the ligaments, fascia, or bone with localized bleeding; immobility of the spine; relaxation of the paraspinal muscles under anesthesia; flattening of the normal lumbar convexity; and stretching and straining of the lumbosacral ligaments and joint capsules. The addition of an anti-inflammatory drug to the local anesthetic used for skin infiltration may decrease the incidence and severity of back pain. The use of spinal or epidural anesthesia in the adult, non-obstetric and obstetric populations should depend on the advantages offered by the technique and not on the occurrence of back pain after the procedure. Additional studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of epidural dexamethasone, or other steroids, or the addition of an anti-inflammatory drug to the local anesthetic infiltration for the prevention of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia. Future studies should involve a physician with expertise in the evaluation of chronic low back pain to help identify the cause of the back pain and institute appropriate treatment(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27195644     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Dry cupping in the treatment of individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain: a protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study.

Authors:  Hugo Jário de Almeida Silva; Bruno T Saragiotto; Rodrigo Scattone Silva; Caio Alano de Almeida Lins; Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Predictors of difficult epidural placement in pregnant women: A trainees' perspective.

Authors:  Suman Rajagopalan; Krishna Shah; Danielle Guffey; Connie Tran; Maya Suresh; Ashutosh Wali
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

3.  Prevalence and Factors Associated with Back Pain among Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia: An Institutional Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Tadael Gudayu Zeleke; Abraham Tarekegn Mersha; Nigussie Simeneh Endalew; Yonas Admasu Ferede
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2021-01-25

4.  Prevalence of chronic pain syndrome in patients who have undergone hallux valgus percutaneous surgery: a comparison of sciatic-femoral and ankle regional ultrasound-guided nerve blocks.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Gianfranco de Iudicibus; Elisa Belluzzi; Miki Dalmau-Pastor; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Manuela Funes; Gian-Mario Parise; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparison of postoperative back pain between paramedian and midline approach for thoracic epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Ji Hee Hong; Eun Young Cho; Jin Woo Shim; Ki Beom Park
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Incidence of newly developed postoperative low back pain with median versus paramedian approach for spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Jung Ha Lee; Dae Hun Yoon; Bong Ha Heo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-01-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.