Literature DB >> 27195634

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen Does Not Worsen Long-Term Mortality of Colorectal Surgery Patients.

Attila Podolyak1, Daniel I Sessler, Christian Reiterer, Edith Fleischmann, Ozan Akça, Edward J Mascha, Robert Greif, Andrea Kurz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A follow-up analysis from a large trial of oxygen and surgical-site infections reported increased long-term mortality among patients receiving supplemental oxygen, especially those having cancer surgery. Although concerning, there is no obvious mechanism linking oxygen to long-term mortality. We thus tested the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen does not increase long-term mortality in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the effect of supplemental oxygen on mortality depended on cancer status.
METHODS: Mortality data were obtained for 927 patients who participated in 2 randomized trials evaluating the effect of supplemental oxygen on wound infection. We assessed the effect of 80% vs 30% oxygen on long-term mortality across 4 clinical sites in the 2 trials using a Cox proportional hazards regression model stratified by study and site. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for each trial. Finally, we report site-stratified hazard ratios for patients with and without cancer at baseline.
RESULTS: There was no effect of 80% vs 30% oxygen on mortality, with an overall site-stratified hazard ratio of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.20; P = 0.57). The treatment effect was consistent across the 2 original studies (interaction P = 0.88) and across the 4 sites (P = 0.84). There was no difference between patients with (n = 451) and without (n = 450) cancer (interaction P = 0.51), with hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.64-1.1) for cancer patients and 0.97 (0.53-1.8) for noncancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the only previous publication, we found that supplemental oxygen had no influence on long-term mortality in the overall surgical population or in patients having cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27195634     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  The WHO recommendation for 80% perioperative oxygen is poorly justified.

Authors:  T Volk; J Peters; D I Sessler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  WHO Needs High FIO2?

Authors:  Ozan Akca; Lorenzo Ball; F Javier Belda; Peter Biro; Andrea Cortegiani; Arieh Eden; Carlos Ferrando; Luciano Gattinoni; Zeev Goldik; Cesare Gregoretti; Thomas Hachenberg; Göran Hedenstierna; Harriet W Hopf; Thomas K Hunt; Paolo Pelosi; Motaz Qadan; Daniel I Sessler; Marina Soro; Mert Şentürk
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 3.  O2 No Longer the Go2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effects of Giving Perioperative Oxygen Therapy of 30% FiO2 to 80% FiO2 on Surgical Site Infection and Mortality.

Authors:  Brianna K Smith; Ross H Roberts; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Intraoperative Fractions of Inspiratory Oxygen Are Associated With Recurrence-Free Survival After Elective Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah Dehne; Verena Spang; Rosa Klotz; Laura Kummer; Samuel Kilian; Katrin Hoffmann; Martin A Schneider; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Markus A Weigand; Jan Larmann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-26

Review 5.  Survival Analysis and Interpretation of Time-to-Event Data: The Tortoise and the Hare.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Thomas R Vetter
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.108

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.