Literature DB >> 27195383

Medical Device Regulation: A Comparison of the United States and the European Union.

Travis G Maak1, James D Wylie.   

Abstract

Medical device regulation is a controversial topic in both the United States and the European Union. Many physicians and innovators in the United States cite a restrictive US FDA regulatory process as the reason for earlier and more rapid clinical advances in Europe. The FDA approval process mandates that a device be proved efficacious compared with a control or be substantially equivalent to a predicate device, whereas the European Union approval process mandates that the device perform its intended function. Stringent, peer-reviewed safety data have not been reported. However, after recent high-profile device failures, political pressure in both the United States and the European Union has favored more restrictive approval processes. Substantial reforms of the European Union process within the next 5 to 10 years will result in a more stringent approach to device regulation, similar to that of the FDA. Changes in the FDA regulatory process have been suggested but are not imminent.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27195383     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

Review 1.  FDA Device Regulation.

Authors:  Madelyn Lauer; Jordan P Barker; Mitchell Solano; Jonathan Dubin
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

2.  Application of Internet of Medical/Health Things to Decentralized Clinical Trials: Development Status and Regulatory Considerations.

Authors:  Takahiro Sato; Hikaru Ishimaru; Takuya Takata; Hajime Sasaki; Mayumi Shikano
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 3.  The Role of the FDA and Regulatory Approval of New Devices for Diabetes Care.

Authors:  Shelley A Jazowski; Aaron N Winn
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Impact of Design on Medical Device Safety.

Authors:  Teodora Miclăuş; Vasiliki Valla; Angeliki Koukoura; Anne Ahlmann Nielsen; Benedicte Dahlerup; Georgios-Ioannis Tsianos; Efstathios Vassiliadis
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 1.778

5.  Boosting the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Performance of Multiscale Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffolds by In Vitro Generated Extracellular Matrix Decoration.

Authors:  Betül Aldemir Dikici; Gwendolen C Reilly; Frederik Claeyssens
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Occurrence and Type of Adverse Events During the Use of Stationary Gait Robots-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jule Bessler; Gerdienke B Prange-Lasonder; Robert V Schulte; Leendert Schaake; Erik C Prinsen; Jaap H Buurke
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-11-16

7.  Open ventilator evaluation framework: A synthesized database of regulatory requirements and technical standards for emergency use ventilators from Australia, Canada, UK, and US.

Authors:  Kate Kazlovich; Soumya Ranjan Mishra; Kamran Behdinan; Aviv Gladman; Jesse May; Azad Mashari
Journal:  HardwareX       Date:  2022-01-07

Review 8.  Advances in spray products for skin regeneration.

Authors:  Paula Pleguezuelos-Beltrán; Patricia Gálvez-Martín; Daniel Nieto-García; Juan Antonio Marchal; Elena López-Ruiz
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 9.  Fostering reproducibility, reusability, and technology transfer in health informatics.

Authors:  Anne-Christin Hauschild; Lisa Eick; Joachim Wienbeck; Dominik Heider
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.