| Literature DB >> 27195254 |
Min Ho Lee1, Ju Hee Lee1, Ho Jun Seol1, Jung-Il Lee1, Jong Hyun Kim2, Doo-Sik Kong1, Do-Hyun Nam1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) are clinically challenging because they present at a late stage with local mass effects or hypopituitarism. Surgery for non-functioning pituitary adenoma requires a special strategic approach for both minimal morbidity and radical resection. However, the clinical predictive factors associated with recurrence are limited. Here, we investigated optimal treatment of non-functioning pituitary adenoma.Entities:
Keywords: Nonfunctioning; Pituitary adenoma; Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy; Recurrence
Year: 2016 PMID: 27195254 PMCID: PMC4868810 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2016.4.1.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Tumor Res Treat ISSN: 2288-2405
Clinical characteristics of patients and tumor with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas
| Variables | No. of patients |
|---|---|
| Number, sex (male:female) | 289 (152:137) |
| Age, yr (median, range) | 51 (15-79) |
| Clinical follow-up, yr (median, range) | 4.0 (1.0-12.6) |
| Initial symptoms, n (%) | |
| Visual symptom | 149 (51.5%) |
| Headache | 96 (33.2%) |
| Incidental | 39 (13.4%) |
| Tumor size, mm (median, range) | 27.8 (9-90) |
| Radiologic findings, n (%) | |
| Supra-sellar extension | 81 (28.0%) |
| Infra-sellar invasion | 10 (3.5%) |
| Cavernous sinus invasion | 43 (14.9%) |
Survival analysis for progression free survival
| Variables | Univariable | Multivariable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (yr) | ||||
| <60 vs. ≥60 | 0.87 (0.42-1.80) | 0.698 | 0.69 (0.33-1.44) | 0.323 |
| Sex | 0.59 (0.33-1.07) | 0.080 | 0.76 (0.42-1.40) | 0.378 |
| Extent of resection | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| GTR vs. NTR | 4.22 (2.02-8.81) | <0.001 | 4.87 (2.29-10.38) | <0.001 |
| GTR vs. STR | 7.08 (3.49-14.38) | <0.001 | 12.06 (5.74-25.35) | <0.001 |
| Adjuvant treatment | ||||
| Yes vs. no | 0.73 (0.23-2.35) | 0.594 | 0.16 (0.05-0.55) | 0.003 |
CI, confidence interval; GTR, gross total removal; HR, hazard ratio; NTR, near total removal; STR, subtotal removal
Fig. 1Progression-free survival between groups based on extent of resection and administration of adjuvant treatment. GTR, gross total removal; NTR, near total removal; STR, subtotal removal; Tx, treatment.
Comparing progression-free survival between the groups based on the extent of resection and administration of adjuvant treatment
| N | Adjuvant Tx | Recur | Median-PFS | 5 yr-PFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (GTR) | 193 | 16 (8.2%) | NR | 95% | ||
| Group 2 (NTR with adjuvant Tx) | 4 | RT: 1, GKS: 3 | 0 | NR | 100% | 0.405 |
| Group 3 (NTR without adjuvant Tx) | 49 | 14 (28.5%) | 7.0 yrs | 65% | <0.001 | |
| Group 4 (STR with adjuvant Tx) | 19 | RT: 13, GKS: 6 | 3 (15.7%) | NR | 80% | 0.135 |
| Group 5 (STR without adjuvant Tx) | 24 | 14 (58.3%) | 3.7 yrs | 35% | <0.001 |
*survival analysis versus Group 1 by Kaplan-Meier, log rank test. GTR, gross total removal; NTR, near total removal; STR, subtotal removal; Tx, treatment; PFS, progression free survival; RT, conventional radiotherapy; GKS, gamma knife radiosurgery; NR, not reached
Immunohistochemistry data of non-functioning pituitary adenoma of 263 cases
| Positive (N) | Negative (N) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ACTH | 30 | 233 | 0.576 |
| TSH | 10 | 253 | 0.589 |
| FSH | 113 | 150 | 0.364 |
| LH | 50 | 213 | 0.716 |
| GH | 25 | 238 | 0.406 |
| PRL | 26 | 237 | 0.149 |
| Null cell (all negative) | 89 | 174 | 0.441 |
| Ki-67 | 32 | 231 | 0.248 |
ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; GH, growth hormone; PRL, prolactin
Fig. 2Illustrative case. A 22-year-old male patient presented with visual field defects. A: Initial MRI showed pituitary adenoma. B: Suspicious residual mass identified after operation. C: 1-yr postoperative MRI showed progression. The patient was lost to follow-up without any further treatment. D: 6-yr postoperative MRI showed significantly progression with hydrocephalus. E: After the second operation, intra-cerebral hemorrhage with intra-ventricular hemorrhage occurred. F: An adjuvant gamma knife radiosurgery was conducted to the residual tumor.