Catherine Fortier1, Mohsen Agharazii1. 1. CHU de Québec Research Center, L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital, and Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Qué., Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in various clinical conditions. The aim of this review is to focus on the arterial stiffness gradient, to discuss the integrated role of medium-sized muscular conduit arteries in the regulation of pulsatile pressure and organ perfusion and to provide a rationale for integrating their mechanical properties into risk prediction. SUMMARY: The physiological arterial stiffness gradient results from a higher degree of vascular stiffness as the distance from the heart increases, creating multiple reflective sites and attenuating the pulsatile nature of the forward pressure wave along the arterial tree down to the microcirculation. The stiffness gradient hypothesis simultaneously explains its physiological beneficial effects from both cardiac and peripheral microcirculatory points of view. The loss or reversal of stiffness gradient leads to the transmission of a highly pulsatile pressure wave into the microcirculation. This suggests that a higher degree of stiffness of medium-sized conduit arteries may play a role in protecting the microcirculation from a highly pulsatile forward pressure wave. Using the ratio of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) to carotid-radial PWV, referred to as PWV ratio, a recent study in a dialysis cohort has shown that the PWV ratio is a better predictor of mortality than the classical carotid-femoral PWV. KEY MESSAGES: Theoretically, the use of the PWV ratio seems more logical for risk determination than aortic stiffness as it provides a better estimation of the loss of stiffness gradient, which is the unifying hypothesis that explains the impact of aortic stiffness both on the myocardium and on peripheral organs.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is a strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in various clinical conditions. The aim of this review is to focus on the arterial stiffness gradient, to discuss the integrated role of medium-sized muscular conduit arteries in the regulation of pulsatile pressure and organ perfusion and to provide a rationale for integrating their mechanical properties into risk prediction. SUMMARY: The physiological arterial stiffness gradient results from a higher degree of vascular stiffness as the distance from the heart increases, creating multiple reflective sites and attenuating the pulsatile nature of the forward pressure wave along the arterial tree down to the microcirculation. The stiffness gradient hypothesis simultaneously explains its physiological beneficial effects from both cardiac and peripheral microcirculatory points of view. The loss or reversal of stiffness gradient leads to the transmission of a highly pulsatile pressure wave into the microcirculation. This suggests that a higher degree of stiffness of medium-sized conduit arteries may play a role in protecting the microcirculation from a highly pulsatile forward pressure wave. Using the ratio of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) to carotid-radial PWV, referred to as PWV ratio, a recent study in a dialysis cohort has shown that the PWV ratio is a better predictor of mortality than the classical carotid-femoral PWV. KEY MESSAGES: Theoretically, the use of the PWV ratio seems more logical for risk determination than aortic stiffness as it provides a better estimation of the loss of stiffness gradient, which is the unifying hypothesis that explains the impact of aortic stiffness both on the myocardium and on peripheral organs.
Authors: Kennedy Cruickshank; Lisa Riste; Simon G Anderson; John S Wright; Graham Dunn; Ray G Gosling Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J J van der Heijden-Spek; J A Staessen; R H Fagard; A P Hoeks; H A Boudier; L M van Bortel Journal: Hypertension Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: K Demuth; J Blacher; A P Guerin; M O Benoit; N Moatti; M E Safar; G M London Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Helen Parise; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Michelle J Keyes; Joseph A Vita; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Melissa Spears; Chris Boustred; Margaret May; Simon G Anderson; Emelia J Benjamin; Pierre Boutouyrie; James Cameron; Chen-Huan Chen; J Kennedy Cruickshank; Shih-Jen Hwang; Edward G Lakatta; Stephane Laurent; João Maldonado; Gary F Mitchell; Samer S Najjar; Anne B Newman; Mitsuru Ohishi; Bruno Pannier; Telmo Pereira; Ramachandran S Vasan; Tomoki Shokawa; Kim Sutton-Tyrell; Francis Verbeke; Kang-Ling Wang; David J Webb; Tine Willum Hansen; Sophia Zoungas; Carmel M McEniery; John R Cockcroft; Ian B Wilkinson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: L-C Desbiens; A Sidibé; R-V Ung; C Fortier; M Munger; Y-P Wang; S-K Bisson; K Marquis; M Agharazii; F Mac-Way Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Luca Zanoli; Paolo Lentini; Marie Briet; Pietro Castellino; Andrew A House; Gerard M London; Lorenzo Malatino; Peter A McCullough; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Pierre Boutouyrie Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Teemu J Niiranen; Bindu Kalesan; Martin G Larson; Naomi M Hamburg; Emelia J Benjamin; Gary F Mitchell; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Ryan J Pewowaruk; Amy J Hein; Cynthia M Carlsson; Claudia E Korcarz; Adam D Gepner Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 5.528
Authors: Keeron Stone; Simon Fryer; James Faulkner; Michelle L Meyer; Kevin Heffernan; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Gabriel Zieff; Craig Paterson; Kunihiro Matsushita; Timothy M Hughes; Hirofumi Tanaka; Lee Stoner Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.844