| Literature DB >> 27195104 |
Cristián Araneda1, María Angélica Larraín2, Benjamin Hecht3, Shawn Narum3.
Abstract
Chilean mussel populations have been thought to be panmictic with limited genetic structure. Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches have enabled investigation of genomewide variation that may better distinguish populations that have evolved in different environments. We investigated neutral and adaptive genetic variation in Mytilus from six locations in southern Chile with 1240 SNPs obtained with RAD-seq. Differentiation among locations with 891 neutral SNPs was low (FST = 0.005). Higher differentiation was obtained with a panel of 58 putative outlier SNPs (FST = 0.114) indicating the potential for local adaptation. This panel identified clusters of genetically related individuals and demonstrated that much of the differentiation (~92%) could be attributed to the three major regions and environments: extreme conditions in Patagonia, inner bay influenced by aquaculture (Reloncaví), and outer bay (Chiloé Island). Patagonia samples were most distinct, but additional analysis carried out excluding this collection also revealed adaptive divergence between inner and outer bay samples. The four locations within Reloncaví area were most similar with all panels of markers, likely due to similar environments, high gene flow by aquaculture practices, and low geographical distance. Our results and the SNP markers developed will be a powerful tool supporting management and programs of this harvested species.Entities:
Keywords: FST outlier; RAD‐seq; SNP discovery; assignment tests; population structure
Year: 2016 PMID: 27195104 PMCID: PMC4851556 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Description of locations, zones, scenarios, number of individual included in the training set (N ts) and holdout set (N hos), and overall sample sizes (N) analyzed in this study
| Code | Sample location | Zone | South latitude/West longitude | Scenarios |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1‐QI | Quillaipe | 1 Reloncaví Gulf | 41° 32′ 55,35″/72° 46′ 14,35″ | 1, 2 | 15 | 15 | 30 |
| 1‐PI | Pichicolo | 1 Reloncaví Gulf | 42° 02′ 23,76″/72° 35′ 27,17′' | 1, 2 | 13 | 12 | 25 |
| 1‐LA | Caleta La Arena | 1 Reloncaví Gulf | 41° 41′ 00,00″/72° 40′ 18,92′' | 1, 2 | 20 | 19 | 39 |
| 1‐CN | Canutillar | 1 Reloncaví Gulf | 41° 31′ 13,90″/72° 20′ 15,69′' | 1, 2 | 17 | 16 | 33 |
| 2‐CB | Canal Coldita | 2 Chiloé Island | 43° 14′ 48,82″/73° 41′ 42,77′' | 1, 2 | 16 | 15 | 31 |
| 3‐IP | Isla Peel | 3 Patagonia | 50° 50′ 29,83″/74° 00′ 41,27′' | 1 | 16 | 16 | 32 |
Figure 1Sampling locations in southern Chile. Codes and geographical positions are indicated in Table 1.
Pairwise F ST calculated using 981 neutral SNPs (above diagonal) and using 58 outlier SNPs (below diagonal, scenario 1) among six collection sites of Mytilus chilensis in southern Chile
| 1‐QI Quillaipe | 1‐PI Pichicolo | 1‐LA Caleta La Arena | 1‐CN Canutillar | 2‐CB Canal Coldita | 3‐IP Isla Peel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1‐QI | −0.004 (−0.013, 0.008) | 0.001 (−0.007, 0.010) | −0.001 (−0.008, 0.010) | 0.004 (−0.005, 0.015) | 0.013 (0.004, 0.023) | |
| 1‐PI | 0.008 (−0.010, 0.032) | 0.001 (−0.009, 0.012) | −0.003 (−0.012, 0.009) | 0.001 (−0.008, 0.013) | 0.012 (0.002, 0.024) | |
| 1‐LA | 0.005 (−0.011, 0.026) | 0.023 (0.002, 0.050) | 0.001 (−0.006, 0.010) | 0.005 (−0.002, 0.015) | 0.015 (0.007, 0.024) | |
| 1‐CN | 0.007 (−0.010, 0.030) | 0.008 (−0.012, 0.034) | 0.017 (−0.001, 0.044) | 0.004 (−0.003, 0.014) | 0.013 (0.005, 0.023) | |
| 2‐CB | 0.080 (0.051, 0.110) | 0.060 (0.033, 0.093) | 0.101 (0.073, 0.129) | 0.082 (0.054, 0.129) | 0.012 (0.003, 0.022) | |
| 3‐IP | 0.228 (0.195, 0.263) | 0.217 (0.183, 0.252) | 0.248 (0.218, 0.279) | 0.231 (0.202, 0.263) | 0.216 (0.189, 0.242) |
95% CIs are showed in parentheses.
Pairwise F ST calculated using 34 outlier SNPs under putative directional selection among five collection sites (scenario 2) of Mytilus chilensis in southern Chile
| 1‐QI Quillaipe | 1‐PI Pichicolo | 1‐LA Caleta La Arena | 1‐CN Canutillar | 2‐CB Canal Coldita | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1‐QI | 0.013 (−0.012, 0.046) | 0.017 (−0.009, 0.051) | 0.013 (−0.010, 0.043) | 0.155 (0.103, 0.208) | |
| 1‐PI | 0.034 (0.004, 0.074) | 0.009 (−0.014, 0.037) | 0.118 (0.072, 0.167) | ||
| 1‐LA | 0.029 (0.001, 0.065) | 0.198 (0.152, 0,242) | |||
| 1‐CN | 0.164 (0.118, 0.207) |
95% CIs are showed in parentheses.
Figure 3Clusters obtained by discriminant analysis of principal component in scenario 2 data (34 putatively outlier SNPs and five locations). Clusters are shown by different colors and inertia ellipses, while dots, triangles, and rhombs represent individuals.
Figure 2Clusters obtained by discriminant analysis of principal component in scenario 1 (58 putative outlier SNPs and six locations). Clusters are shown by different colors and inertia ellipses, while dots, triangles, and rhombs represent individuals.
Comparison between individual's classifications obtained from discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) and assignment of individuals to origin locations using GeneClass2 in Mytilus chilensis in southern Chile, scenario 1
| Location | DAPC Clusters | Assignment obtained with GeneClass2 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave One Out | Simple Training and Holdout | ||||||||||||||||
| Reloncaví | Chiloé | Patagonia | Reloncaví | Chiloé | Patagonia | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1‐QI | 1‐PI | 1‐LA | 1‐CN | 2‐CB | 3‐IP | Total | 1‐QI | 1‐PI | 1‐LA | 1‐CN | 2‐CB | 3‐IP | Total | |
| 1‐QI | 28 | 2 | 0 |
| 2 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 30 |
| 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 1‐PI | 19 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| 1‐LA | 38 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 39 | 5 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| 1‐CN | 30 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| 3 | 0 | 33 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| 1 | 0 | 16 |
| 2‐CB | 3 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | 31 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 15 |
| 3‐IP | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 |
Correct assignment to origin location is on diagonal of table in bold font.
Gray cells identify individuals from Reloncaví locations correctly reassigned to Reloncaví zone.
Comparison between individual's classifications obtained from discriminant analysis of principal component (DAPC) and assignment of individuals to origin locations using GeneClass2 in Mytilus chilensis in southern Chile, scenario 2
| Location | DAPC Clusters | Assignment obtained with GeneClass2 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leave One Out | Simple Training and Holdout | ||||||||||||||
| Reloncaví | Chiloé | Reloncaví | Chiloé | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1‐QI | 1‐PI | 1‐LA | 1‐CN | 2‐CB | Total | 1‐QI | 1‐PI | 1‐LA | 1‐CN | 2‐CB | Total | |
| 1‐QI | 16 | 12 | 2 |
| 3 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 30 |
| 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| 1‐PI | 16 | 6 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| 1‐LA | 17 | 21 | 1 | 9 | 3 |
| 5 | 1 | 39 | 4 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | 19 |
| 1‐CN | 18 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| 3 | 33 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 16 |
| 2‐CB | 4 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 |
Correct assignment to origin location is on diagonal of table in bold font.
Gray cells identify individuals from Reloncaví locations correctly reassigned to Reloncaví zone.