Literature DB >> 27194992

Clinical Practice of Two Measurements of Home Blood Pressure on Each Occasion in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Tomonari Okada1, Toshikazu Wada1, Yume Nagaoka1, Yoshihiko Kanno1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although several guidelines propose two or three measurements of home blood pressure (HBP) on each occasion, the actual status of multiple measurements is not clear in the practical management of hypertension. We surveyed the details regarding two measurements of HBP in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS: HBP was measured twice every morning and evening over 7 consecutive days in 175 CKD patients. The distribution of the differences between two BP values (2nd - 1st BP) and their association with BP parameters were evaluated.
RESULTS: The 2nd - 1st morning systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) differences were -2.3 ± 4.1 and -0.4 ± 2.6 mm Hg, respectively. The proportion of 2nd - 1st morning SBP differences >0 mm Hg was 31.7% in a total of 1,195 measurements. Eighty patients (45.7%) had days with a difference ≤-5 mm Hg and days with a difference ≥5 mm Hg in morning SBP during 7 days. The multivariate regression analysis of the SD values of 2nd - 1st morning SBP as a dependent variable showed that the SD value of the 1st morning SBP (β = 0.65, p < 0.001) was a significant determinant.
CONCLUSION: Although the 2nd SBP was 2-3 mm Hg lower than the 1st SBP in the population as a whole, various differences were found for each subject during 7 days. 2nd - 1st BP variability might be associated with day-by-day 1st BP variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure variability; Chronic kidney disease; Home blood pressure; Hypertension; Self-measurement of blood pressure

Year:  2015        PMID: 27194992      PMCID: PMC4698642          DOI: 10.1159/000438464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiorenal Med        ISSN: 1664-5502            Impact factor:   2.041


  18 in total

1.  Factors affecting the variability of home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: the Finn-home study.

Authors:  Jouni K Johansson; Teemu J Niiranen; Pauli J Puukka; Antti M Jula
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.

Authors:  Roberto Sega; Rita Facchetti; Michele Bombelli; Giancarlo Cesana; Giovanni Corrao; Guido Grassi; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  How many times should we ask subjects to measure blood pressure at home on each occasion?

Authors:  Yutaka Imai; Taku Obara; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  The optimal home blood pressure monitoring schedule based on the Didima outcome study.

Authors:  G S Stergiou; E G Nasothimiou; P G Kalogeropoulos; N Pantazis; N M Baibas
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Optimal schedule for home blood pressure monitoring based on a clinical approach.

Authors:  Jouni K Johansson; Teemu J Niiranen; Pauli J Puukka; Antti M Jula
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Influence of repeated measurement on one occasion, on successive days, and on workdays on home blood pressure values.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawabe; Ikuo Saito; Takao Saruta
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 1.749

7.  Reproducibility of home blood pressure measurements over a 1-year period.

Authors:  M Sakuma; Y Imai; K Nagai; N Watanabe; H Sakuma; N Minami; H Satoh; K Abe
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.689

8.  Blood pressure control assessed by home, ambulatory and conventional blood pressure measurements in the Japanese general population: the Ohasama study.

Authors:  Atsushi Hozawa; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Junko Yamaguchi; Kaori Ohmori; Tohru Fujiwara; Junichiro Hashimoto; Mitsunobu Matsubar; Hirofumi Kitaoka; Kenichi Nagai; Ichiro Tsuji; Hiroshi Satoh; Shigeru Hisamichi; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Which measurement of home blood pressure should be used for clinical evaluation when multiple measurements are made?

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawabe; Ikuo Saito
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.

Authors:  Ikuo Saito; Kazuomi Kario; Toshio Kushiro; Satoshi Teramukai; Natsuko Zenimura; Katsutoshi Hiramatsu; Fumiaki Kobayashi; Kazuyuki Shimada
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.