Literature DB >> 27194617

Gene expression characterizes different nutritional strategies among three mixotrophic protists.

Zhenfeng Liu1, Victoria Campbell2, Karla B Heidelberg2, David A Caron2.   

Abstract

Mixotrophic protists, i.e. protists that can carry out both phototrophy and heterotrophy, are a group of organisms with a wide range of nutritional strategies. The ecological and biogeochemical importance of these species has recently been recognized. In this study, we investigated and compared the gene expression of three mixotrophic protists, Prymnesium parvum, Dinobyron sp. and Ochromonas sp. under light and dark conditions in the presence of prey using RNA-Seq. Gene expression of the obligately phototrophic P. parvum and Dinobryon sp. changed significantly between light and dark treatments, while that of primarily heterotrophic Ochromonas sp. was largely unchanged. Gene expression of P. parvum and Dinobryon sp. shared many similarities, especially in the expression patterns of genes related to reproduction. However, key genes involved in central carbon metabolism and phagotrophy had different expression patterns between these two species, suggesting differences in prey consumption and heterotrophic nutrition in the dark. Transcriptomic data also offered clues to other physiological traits of these organisms such as preference of nitrogen sources and photo-oxidative stress. These results provide potential target genes for further exploration of the mechanisms of mixotrophic physiology and demonstrate the potential usefulness of molecular approaches in characterizing the nutritional modes of mixotrophic protists. © FEMS 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prymnesium, Dinobryon, Ochromonas; gene expression; mixotrophic protist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194617     DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  12 in total

Review 1.  Probing the evolution, ecology and physiology of marine protists using transcriptomics.

Authors:  David A Caron; Harriet Alexander; Andrew E Allen; John M Archibald; E Virginia Armbrust; Charles Bachy; Callum J Bell; Arvind Bharti; Sonya T Dyhrman; Stephanie M Guida; Karla B Heidelberg; Jonathan Z Kaye; Julia Metzner; Sarah R Smith; Alexandra Z Worden
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Dinoflagellates alter their carbon and nutrient metabolic strategies across environmental gradients in the central Pacific Ocean.

Authors:  Natalie R Cohen; Matthew R McIlvin; Dawn M Moran; Noelle A Held; Jaclyn K Saunders; Nicholas J Hawco; Michael Brosnahan; Giacomo R DiTullio; Carl Lamborg; John P McCrow; Chris L Dupont; Andrew E Allen; Mak A Saito
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 17.745

3.  Comprehensive transcriptome analysis provides new insights into nutritional strategies and phylogenetic relationships of chrysophytes.

Authors:  Sven Rahmann; Jens Boenigk; Daniela Beisser; Nadine Graupner; Christina Bock; Sabina Wodniok; Lars Grossmann; Matthijs Vos; Bernd Sures
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Ecophysiological Effects of Light and Silver Stress on the Mixotrophic Protist Poterioochromonas malhamensis.

Authors:  Daniela Beisser; Farnusch Kaschani; Nadine Graupner; Lars Grossmann; Manfred Jensen; Sabrina Ninck; Florian Schulz; Sven Rahmann; Jens Boenigk; Markus Kaiser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Autotrophic and heterotrophic acquisition of carbon and nitrogen by a mixotrophic chrysophyte established through stable isotope analysis.

Authors:  Ramon Terrado; Alexis L Pasulka; Alle A-Y Lie; Victoria J Orphan; Karla B Heidelberg; David A Caron
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Effect of light and prey availability on gene expression of the mixotrophic chrysophyte, Ochromonas sp.

Authors:  Alle A Y Lie; Zhenfeng Liu; Ramon Terrado; Avery O Tatters; Karla B Heidelberg; David A Caron
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Evolution of heterotrophy in chrysophytes as reflected by comparative transcriptomics.

Authors:  Nadine Graupner; Manfred Jensen; Christina Bock; Sabina Marks; Sven Rahmann; Daniela Beisser; Jens Boenigk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  Compound-specific isotope analysis of benthic foraminifer amino acids suggests microhabitat variability in rocky-shore environments.

Authors:  Masashi Tsuchiya; Yoshito Chikaraishi; Hidetaka Nomaki; Yoko Sasaki; Akihiro Tame; Katsuyuki Uematsu; Naohiko Ohkouchi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Mixotrophy in Chlorophytes and Haptophytes-Effect of Irradiance, Macronutrient, Micronutrient and Vitamin Limitation.

Authors:  Ruth Anderson; Sophie Charvet; Per J Hansen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Gene expression during bacterivorous growth of a widespread marine heterotrophic flagellate.

Authors:  Ramon Massana; Aurelie Labarre; David López-Escardó; Aleix Obiol; François Bucchini; Thomas Hackl; Matthias G Fischer; Klaas Vandepoele; Denis V Tikhonenkov; Filip Husnik; Patrick J Keeling
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.