Literature DB >> 27194329

Less Is More: Semantic Information Survives Interocular Suppression When Attention Is Diverted.

Kangyong Eo1, Oakyoon Cha1, Sang Chul Chong2, Min-Suk Kang3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The extent of unconscious semantic processing has been debated. It is well established that semantic information is registered in the absence of awareness induced by inattention. However, it has been debated whether semantic information of invisible stimuli is processed during interocular suppression, a procedure that renders one eye's view invisible by presenting a dissimilar stimulus to the other eye. Inspired by recent evidence demonstrating that reduced attention attenuates interocular suppression, we tested a counterintuitive hypothesis that attention withdrawn from the suppressed target location facilitates semantic processing in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression. We obtained an electrophysiological marker of semantic processing (N400 component) while human participants' spatial attention was being manipulated with a cueing paradigm during interocular suppression. We found that N400 modulation was absent when participants' attention was directed to the target location, but present when diverted elsewhere. In addition, the correlation analysis across participants indicated that the N400 amplitude was reduced with more attention being directed to the target location. Together, these results indicate that inattention attenuates interocular suppression and thereby makes semantic processing available unconsciously, reconciling conflicting evidence in the literature. We discuss a tight link among interocular suppression, attention, and conscious awareness. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Interocular suppression offers a powerful means of studying the extent of unconscious processing by rendering a salient stimulus presented to one eye invisible. Here, we provide evidence that attention is a determining factor for unconscious semantic processing. An electrophysiological marker for semantic processing (N400 component) was present when attention was diverted away from the suppressed stimulus but absent when attention was directed to that stimulus, indicating that inattention facilitates unconscious semantic processing during the interocular suppression. Although contrary to the common sense assumption that attention facilitates information processing, this result is in accordance with recent studies showing that attention modulates interocular suppression but is not necessary for semantic processing. Our finding reconciles the conflicting evidence and advances theories of consciousness.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/365489-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; consciousness; event-related potential; interocular suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194329      PMCID: PMC6601767          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3018-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between attention and consciousness: an expanded taxonomy and implications for 'no-report' paradigms.

Authors:  Michael A Pitts; Lydia A Lutsyshyna; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  CFS-crafter: An open-source tool for creating and analyzing images for continuous flash suppression experiments.

Authors:  Guandong Wang; David Alais; Randolph Blake; Shui'Er Han
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Automatic Processing of Emotional Words in the Absence of Awareness: The Critical Role of P2.

Authors:  Yi Lei; Haoran Dou; Qingming Liu; Wenhai Zhang; Zhonglu Zhang; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-20

4.  Composite binocular perception from dichoptic stimulus arrays with similar ensemble information.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Randolph Blake; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Invisible Flashes Alter Perceived Sound Location.

Authors:  Patrycja Delong; Máté Aller; Anette S Giani; Tim Rohe; Verena Conrad; Masataka Watanabe; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Emotion in Chinese Words Could Not Be Extracted in Continuous Flash Suppression.

Authors:  Kaiwen Cheng; Aolin Ding; Lianfang Jiang; Han Tian; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?

Authors:  Fenja Mareike Benthien; Guido Hesselmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2021-04-06

8.  Novel procedure for generating continuous flash suppression: Seurat meets Mondrian.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Gaeun Son; Sang Chul Chong; David A Tovar; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.