Literature DB >> 27194248

Thinking outside the box: re-evaluating the approach to penetrating cardiac injuries.

E W Stranch1, B L Zarzaur2, S A Savage3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Penetrating cardiac injuries are infrequent but highly lethal. To address these injuries, cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiothoracic surgery availability are required for Level I trauma center verification. However, acute care surgeons are more readily available for this time-sensitive injury. The purpose of this study was to review an acute care surgery-based experience with penetrating cardiac trauma at an urban Level 1 trauma center. Our hypothesis was that care provided solely by acute care surgeons was both safe and effective for this patient population.
METHODS: All patients with injuries to the 'cardiac box' following penetrating thoracic trauma were identified from 2005-2010. Demographic and injury related data were obtained. The types and location of cardiac injury, as well as patient outcomes, were determined from operative reports.
RESULTS: 1701 patients with penetrating chest trauma were admitted during the study period. 260 patients were identified as having high-risk injuries and were included in the review. 37 patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy, with a survival rate of 8 %. 76 patients (29 %) suffered a cardiac injury. 72 % of these patients had a preoperative FAST exam, which had a sensitivity and specificity of 56.5 and 82.5 % respectively. 82 % underwent a pericardial window, which had a positive predictive value of 81.4 %. 61 % (n = 46) of the patients with a cardiac injury survived, while the overall death rate in this cohort was 21 %. No patients in the cohort required cardiopulmonary bypass for emergent repair of cardiac injury and acute care surgeons performed all cases.
CONCLUSION: Penetrating injury to the heart is highly lethal and time-sensitive. Increasingly, FAST and subxyphoid pericardial window are relied upon to make the diagnosis in patients arriving in varying stages of shock to the resuscitation room. Acute care surgeons are the most appropriate surgeons to care for these injuries and provide safe and effective care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute care surgery; Cardiac injury; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Penetrating thoracic trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27194248     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-016-0680-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  20 in total

1.  Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: review of published data from the past 25 years.

Authors:  P M Rhee; J Acosta; A Bridgeman; D Wang; M Jordan; N Rich
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Screening for occult penetrating cardiac injuries.

Authors:  Andrew J Nicol; Pradeep H Navsaria; Steve Beningfield; Martijn Hommes; Delawir Kahn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Subxiphoid pericardial window to exclude occult cardiac injury after penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma.

Authors:  M Hommes; A J Nicol; J van der Stok; I Kodde; P H Navsaria
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Cardiac and great vessel injuries after chest trauma: our 10-year experience.

Authors:  Burak Onan; Recep Demirhan; Kürşad Öz; Ismihan Selen Onan
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2011-09

5.  Penetrating cardiac injury and the significance of chest computed tomography findings.

Authors:  David S Plurad; Scott Bricker; Timothy L Van Natta; Angela Neville; Dennis Kim; Frederic Bongard; Brant Putnam
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-03-08

6.  Affairs of the wounded heart: penetrating cardiac wounds.

Authors:  J K Trinkle; R S Toon; J L Franz; K V Arom; F L Grover
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1979-06

7.  Sixty-Seven Consecutive Resuscitative Thoracotomies by A Single Surgeon.

Authors:  R Rabinovici
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.360

8.  One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation.

Authors:  J A Asensio; J D Berne; D Demetriades; L Chan; J Murray; A Falabella; H Gomez; S Chahwan; G Velmahos; E E Cornwell; H Belzberg; W Shoemaker; T V Berne
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-06

9.  Survival predictor for penetrating cardiac injury; a 10-year consecutive cohort from a scandinavian trauma center.

Authors:  Mari-Liis Kaljusto; Nils Oddvar Skaga; Johan Pillgram-Larsen; Theis Tønnessen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  False negative pericardial Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma examination following cardiac rupture from blunt thoracic trauma: a case report.

Authors:  Laura Baker; Ammar Almadani; Chad G Ball
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Editorial: "Focus on disaster and military surgery".

Authors:  I Ashkenazi; M Bemelman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The Challenges of Using ICD codes to Perform a Comparative Analysis between Patients with Penetrating Cardiac Injuries who Underwent Non-Resuscitative Thoracotomy versus Sternotomy.

Authors:  Nikolay Bugaev; Janis L Breeze; Alyssa M Tutunjian; Horacio M Hojman; Eric J Mahoney; Benjamin P Johnson; Sandra S Arabian
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Damage control for subclavian artery injury.

Authors:  Adenauer Marinho de Oliveira Góes; Mariana Pereira Maurity; Carlos Alberto Costa do Amaral
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2020-09-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.