Thomy Tonia1, Herman Van Oyen2, Anke Berger3, Christian Schindler4,5, Nino Künzli4,5. 1. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. thomai.tonia@ispm.unibe.ch. 2. Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. 5. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether exposing scientific papers to social media (SM) has an effect on article downloads and citations. METHODS: We randomized all International Journal of Public Health (IJPH) original articles published between December 2012 and December 2014 to SM exposure (blog post, Twitter and Facebook) or no exposure at three different time points after first online publication. RESULTS: 130 papers (SM exposure = 65, control = 65) were randomized. The number of downloads did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.60) nor did the number of citations (p = 0.88). Adjusting for length of observation and paper's geographical origin did not change these results. There was no difference in the number of downloads and citations between the SM exposure and control group when we stratified for open access status. The number of downloads and number of citations were significantly correlated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SM exposure did not have a significant effect on traditional impact metrics, such as downloads and citations. However, other metrics may measure the added value that social media might offer to a scientific journal, such as wider dissemination.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether exposing scientific papers to social media (SM) has an effect on article downloads and citations. METHODS: We randomized all International Journal of Public Health (IJPH) original articles published between December 2012 and December 2014 to SM exposure (blog post, Twitter and Facebook) or no exposure at three different time points after first online publication. RESULTS: 130 papers (SM exposure = 65, control = 65) were randomized. The number of downloads did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.60) nor did the number of citations (p = 0.88). Adjusting for length of observation and paper's geographical origin did not change these results. There was no difference in the number of downloads and citations between the SM exposure and control group when we stratified for open access status. The number of downloads and number of citations were significantly correlated in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SM exposure did not have a significant effect on traditional impact metrics, such as downloads and citations. However, other metrics may measure the added value that social media might offer to a scientific journal, such as wider dissemination.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bibliometrics; Citations; Downloads; Facebook; Social media; Twitter
Authors: Caroline S Fox; Marc A Bonaca; John J Ryan; Joseph M Massaro; Karen Barry; Joseph Loscalzo Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Bekaidar Nurmashev; Marlen Yessirkepov; Elena E Udovik; Aleksandr A Baryshnikov; George D Kitas Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Marco Bardus; Rola El Rassi; Mohamad Chahrour; Elie W Akl; Abdul Sattar Raslan; Lokman I Meho; Elie A Akl Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Thomy Tonia; Herman Van Oyen; Anke Berger; Christian Schindler; Nino Künzli Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 3.380