Literature DB >> 27191545

Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.

Michelle Y Cheng1, Andrea Sukhov2, Hawa Sultani1, Kyoungmi Kim3, Emanual Maverakis1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants are becoming increasingly competitive in the academic research arena. Identifying NIH funding disparities is an important step in improving academic diversity.
OBJECTIVE: To examine recent NIH funding trends in dermatology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective study with linear regression analysis and repeated-measures analysis of variance of all NIH grants awarded to departments of dermatology from fiscal year 2009 to 2014. Funding data were exported from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Publication data were drawn from Scopus. All NIH-funded principal investigators in dermatology were categorized by their academic degree and sex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The NIH funding trends were compared by investigator degree (MD, PhD, or MD/PhD) and sex.
RESULTS: A total of 1292 NIH-funded grants were awarded to dermatology research from fiscal year 2009 through 2014. Adjusted NIH funding for dermatologic research diminished by 4.6% from $67.3 million in 2009 to $64.2 million in 2014, with a nadir of $58.6 million in 2013. Funding for the NIH's Research Project Grant Program (R01) decreased by 21.0% from $43.9 million to $34.7 million during this period. The dollar amount of NIH funding significantly trended down for investigators with an MD degree by $1.35 million per year from $23.6 million in 2009 to $18.4 million in 2014 (P = .02) while there was no significant change in NIH funding for MD/PhD (from $17.6 million in 2009 to $19.8 million in 2014; P = .44) and PhD investigators (from $26.1 million in 2009 to $25.9 million in 2014; P = .74). Similarly, the total dollar amount of R01 grants awarded to principal investigators with only an MD degree trended down by $1.4 million per year from $13.2 million in 2009 to $6.0 million in 2014 (P < .001). The number of female investigators with NIH grants in dermatology trended down significantly compared with the trend of their male counterparts (from 49 women in 2009 to 43 women in 2014 vs from 84 men in 2009 to 97 men in 2014; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is a downward trend in NIH funding for female and MD-only dermatology investigators. Departmental support and junior faculty mentorship for women and MD investigators is crucial for maintaining their presence in NIH-funded dermatology research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27191545     DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  11 in total

1.  Gender Equity Improving among Award Winners and Leaders at the Society for Investigative Dermatology.

Authors:  Neha Shukla; Mackenzie R Wehner; Lily Morrison; Haley B Naik; Eleni Linos
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 8.551

2.  Gender differences in funding among grant recipients in emergency medicine: A multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Nicole M Dubosh; Katherine L Boyle; Stephanie Carreiro; Tuyen Yankama; Alden M Landry
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Diversification in the medical sciences fuels growth of physician-scientists.

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Research on Skin Cancer-Related Behaviors and Outcomes in the NIH Grant Portfolio, 2000-2014: Skin Cancer Intervention Across the Cancer Control Continuum (SCI-3C).

Authors:  Frank M Perna; Laura A Dwyer; Gina Tesauro; Jennifer M Taber; Wynne E Norton; Anne M Hartman; Alan C Geller
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Gender Equity in Clinical Dermatology-Reason for Optimism.

Authors:  Mackenzie R Wehner; Haley B Naik; Eleni Linos
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 6.  The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Sayaka Sato; Pascal Mark Gygax; Julian Randall; Marianne Schmid Mast
Journal:  High Educ (Dordr)       Date:  2020-10-03

7.  Gender and race trends in academic rank of dermatologists at top U.S. institutions: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Claire Stewart; Shari R Lipner
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  Disparities in Academic Dermatology.

Authors:  Jenna Lester; Bruce Wintroub; Eleni Linos
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  Gender gaps in National Institutes of Health dermatology grant recipients.

Authors:  Alyssa M Thompson; Kyla N Price; Swetha Atluri; Danielle Yee; Jennifer L Hsiao; Vivian Y Shi
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-05

10.  Gender differences in career development awards in United States' anesthesiology and surgery departments, 2006-2016.

Authors:  Lena M Mayes; Cynthia A Wong; Shanta Zimmer; Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Karsten Bartels
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.