| Literature DB >> 27191223 |
Dana L Thomas, Gilberto A Santiago, Roman Abeyta, Steven Hinojosa, Brenda Torres-Velasquez, Jessica K Adam, Nicole Evert, Elba Caraballo, Elizabeth Hunsperger, Jorge L Muñoz-Jordán, Brian Smith, Alison Banicki, Kay M Tomashek, Linda Gaul, Tyler M Sharp.
Abstract
During a dengue epidemic in northern Mexico, enhanced surveillance identified 53 laboratory-positive cases in southern Texas; 26 (49%) patients acquired the infection locally, and 29 (55%) were hospitalized. Of 83 patient specimens that were initially IgM negative according to ELISA performed at a commercial laboratory, 14 (17%) were dengue virus positive by real-time reverse transcription PCR performed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dengue virus types 1 and 3 were identified, and molecular phylogenetic analysis demonstrated close identity with viruses that had recently circulated in Mexico and Central America. Of 51 household members of 22 dengue case-patients who participated in household investigations, 6 (12%) had been recently infected with a dengue virus and reported no recent travel, suggesting intrahousehold transmission. One household member reported having a recent illness consistent with dengue. This outbreak reinforces emergence of dengue in southern Texas, particularly when incidence is high in northern Mexico.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue; Texas; United States; dengue virus; outbreak; reemergence; vector-borne infections; viruses
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27191223 PMCID: PMC4880107 DOI: 10.3201/eid2206.152000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Suspected dengue cases identified by the Texas Department of State Health Services, 2013. A total of 264 suspected dengue cases were reported along with IgM ELISA diagnostic test results obtained from commercial diagnostic laboratories. A subset of 112 available specimens was forwarded for confirmatory diagnostic testing by real-time reverse transcription PCR and anti–dengue virus IgM ELISA. Black, positive result (n = 53); gray, laboratory-indeterminate result (n = 127); white, laboratory-negative result (n = 84).
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of the 5 dengue virus type 1 isolates obtained from dengue case-patients in southern Texas, 2013. Maximum clade credibility tree inferred from 90 envelope glycoprotein gene sequences: 5 from Texas in 2013 (solid circles), and 85 from GenBank. BEAST version 1.8.2 (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/) was used with strict molecular clock constant population size and 10 million Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations; effective sample size >200. Posterior probabilities >0.50 are shown in major nodes. All sequences shown belong to the American-African genotype. Other genotypes were not included to increase resolution of the Central American lineage. Black tapered lines indicate condensation of a monophyletic lineage with a single common ancestor. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. MX, Mexico.
Characteristics of households and household members with evidence of intrahousehold transmission of DENV, southern Texas, 2013*
| Characteristics | No evidence of intrahousehold transmission, n = 9† | Evidence of intrahousehold transmission, n = 6† |
|---|---|---|
| Households |
|
|
| No. residents, mean (range) | 2 (2–6) | 4 (3–5) |
| Ratio of adults:children, mean (range) | 0.8 (0.2–1) | 2.8 (1–4) |
| Recent visitors from Mexico, no. (%)‡ | 4 (44) | 1 (17) |
| Window screens, no. (%) | 8 (89) | 4 (67) |
| Air-conditioning, no. (%) | 7 (78) | 6 (100) |
| Mosquitoes recently seen in house, no. (%) | 7 (78) | 2 (33) |
| Household members | No evidence of recent DENV infection, n = 44 | Evidence of recent DENV infection, n = 7 |
| Age, y, median (range) | 26 (1.4–71) | 45 (3–79) |
| Portion of life lived in Mexico, mean % (range) | 42 (0–96) | 33 (0–71) |
| Recent travel to Mexico, no. (%)‡ | 25 (57) | 1 (14) |
| Recently used mosquito repellant, no. (%)‡ | 27 (61) | 4 (57) |
| Recent febrile illness, no. (%)‡ | 0 (0) | 1 (14) |
*DENV, dengue virus. †7 households were excluded from analysis because not all household members provided a serum specimen for diagnostic testing and therefore could not be confidently defined as not having evidence of intrahousehold transmission. ‡Within past 3 mo.