Literature DB >> 27190009

Dopamine D2 receptor gene variants and response to rasagiline in early Parkinson's disease: a pharmacogenetic study.

Mario Masellis1, Shannon Collinson2, Natalie Freeman2, Maria Tampakeras2, Joseph Levy3, Amir Tchelet3, Eli Eyal3, Elijahu Berkovich3, Rom E Eliaz3, Victor Abler3, Iris Grossman3, Cheryl Fitzer-Attas3, Arun Tiwari2, Michael R Hayden3, James L Kennedy4, Anthony E Lang5, Jo Knight6.   

Abstract

The treatment of early Parkinson's disease with dopaminergic agents remains the mainstay of symptomatic therapy for this incurable neurodegenerative disorder. However, clinical responses to dopaminergic drugs vary substantially from person to person due to individual-, drug- and disease-related factors that may in part be genetically determined. Using clinical data and DNA samples ascertained through the largest placebo-controlled clinical trial of the monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, rasagiline (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256204), we examined how polymorphisms in candidate genes associate with the clinical response to rasagiline in early Parkinson's disease. Variants in genes that express proteins involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rasagiline, and genes previously associated with the risk to develop Parkinson's disease were genotyped. The LifeTechnologies OpenArray NT genotyping platform and polymerase chain reaction-based methods were used to analyse 204 single nucleotide polymorphisms and five variable number tandem repeats from 30 candidate genes in 692 available DNA samples from this clinical trial. The peak symptomatic response to rasagiline, the rate of symptom progression, and their relation to genetic variation were examined controlling for placebo effects using general linear and mixed effects models, respectively. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, rs2283265 and rs1076560, in the dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) were found to be significantly associated with a favourable peak response to rasagiline at 12 weeks in early Parkinson's disease after controlling for multiple testing. From a linear regression, the betas were 2.5 and 2.38, respectively, with false discovery rate-corrected P-values of 0.032. These polymorphisms were in high linkage disequilibrium with each other (r(2) = 0.96) meaning that the same clinical response signal was identified by each of them. No polymorphisms were associated with slowing the rate of worsening in Parkinson symptoms from Weeks 12 to 36 after correction for multiple testing. This is the largest and most comprehensive pharmacogenetics study to date examining clinical response to an anti-parkinsonian drug and the first to be conducted in patients with early stage Parkinson's disease receiving monotherapy. The results indicate a clinically meaningful benefit to rasagiline in terms of the magnitude of improvement in parkinsonian symptoms for those with the favourable response genotypes. Future work is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms through which these DRD2 variants operate in modulating the function of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system.media-1vid110.1093/brain/aww109_video_abstractaww109_video_abstract.
© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DRD2; Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS; polymorphism; rasagiline response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27190009     DOI: 10.1093/brain/aww109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  21 in total

1.  DRD2 Genotype-Based Variants Modulates D2 Receptor Distribution in Ventral Striatum.

Authors:  Mikaeel Valli; Sang Soo Cho; Mario Masellis; Robert Chen; Pablo Rusjan; Jinhee Kim; Yuko Koshimori; Alexander Mihaescu; Antonio P Strafella
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Rasagiline Sensitive Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene Variants: A Step Forward Toward More Personalized Antiparkinsonian Therapy.

Authors:  Shakya Bhattacharjee; Emily Hughes; Kher Lik Ng
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2016-10-01

3.  Hypomania and saccadic changes in Parkinson's disease: influence of D2 and D3 dopaminergic signalling.

Authors:  Esther A Pelzer; Barbara Dillenburger; Sophie Grundmann; Vladimir Iliaev; Sophie Aschenberg; Corina Melzer; Martin Hess; Gereon R Fink; Carsten Eggers; Marc Tittgemeyer; Lars Timmermann
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 4.  Genetic Variation and Neuroplasticity: Role in Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  Genetics and Treatment Response in Parkinson's Disease: An Update on Pharmacogenetic Studies.

Authors:  Cristina Politi; Cinzia Ciccacci; Giuseppe Novelli; Paola Borgiani
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 6.  Genetics of Parkinson's disease: An introspection of its journey towards precision medicine.

Authors:  Sara Bandres-Ciga; Monica Diez-Fairen; Jonggeol Jeff Kim; Andrew B Singleton
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 7.  The emerging science of precision medicine and pharmacogenomics for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Haydeh Payami
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 8.  Unlocking the mystery of biomarkers: A brief introduction, challenges and opportunities in Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Thomas F Tropea; Alice S Chen-Plotkin
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.891

9.  Parkinson disease: Dopamine receptor variants improve response to rasagiline in PD.

Authors:  Ian Fyfe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  A Systematic Review of Parkinson's Disease Pharmacogenomics: Is There Time for Translation into the Clinics?

Authors:  Vladimira Vuletić; Valentino Rački; Eliša Papić; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.