Literature DB >> 27189134

3D scanning and 3D printing as innovative technologies for fabricating personalized topical drug delivery systems.

Alvaro Goyanes1, Usanee Det-Amornrat1, Jie Wang1, Abdul W Basit2, Simon Gaisford3.   

Abstract

Acne is a multifactorial inflammatory skin disease with high prevalence. In this work, the potential of 3D printing to produce flexible personalised-shape anti-acne drug (salicylic acid) loaded devices was demonstrated by two different 3D printing (3DP) technologies: Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) and stereolithography (SLA). 3D scanning technology was used to obtain a 3D model of a nose adapted to the morphology of an individual. In FDM 3DP, commercially produced Flex EcoPLA™ (FPLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) filaments were loaded with salicylic acid by hot melt extrusion (HME) (theoretical drug loading - 2% w/w) and used as feedstock material for 3D printing. Drug loading in the FPLA-salicylic acid and PCL-salicylic acid 3D printed patches was 0.4% w/w and 1.2% w/w respectively, indicating significant thermal degradation of drug during HME and 3D printing. Diffusion testing in Franz cells using a synthetic membrane revealed that the drug loaded printed samples released <187μg/cm(2) within 3h. FPLA-salicylic acid filament was successfully printed as a nose-shape mask by FDM 3DP, but the PCL-salicylic acid filament was not. In the SLA printing process, the drug was dissolved in different mixtures of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) that were solidified by the action of a laser beam. SLA printing led to 3D printed devices (nose-shape) with higher resolution and higher drug loading (1.9% w/w) than FDM, with no drug degradation. The results of drug diffusion tests revealed that drug diffusion was faster than with the FDM devices, 229 and 291μg/cm(2) within 3h for the two formulations evaluated. In this study, SLA printing was the more appropriate 3D printing technology to manufacture anti-acne devices with salicylic acid. The combination of 3D scanning and 3D printing has the potential to offer solutions to produce personalised drug loaded devices, adapted in shape and size to individual patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acne vulgaris; Additive manufacturing; Fused deposition modelling; Hot melt extrusion; Rapid prototyping; Stereolithography; Three dimensional printing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27189134     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  50 in total

Review 1.  An Overview of 3D Printing Technologies for Soft Materials and Potential Opportunities for Lipid-based Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Kapilkumar Vithani; Alvaro Goyanes; Vincent Jannin; Abdul W Basit; Simon Gaisford; Ben J Boyd
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Recent Developments.

Authors:  Gordon M Paul; Amin Rezaienia; Pihua Wen; Sridhar Condoor; Nadeem Parkar; Wilson King; Theodosios Korakianitis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

3.  3D Printed "Starmix" Drug Loaded Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications.

Authors:  Nicolaos Scoutaris; Steven A Ross; Dennis Douroumis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Hydrogel Production Platform with Dynamic Movement Using Photo-Crosslinkable/Temperature Reversible Chitosan Polymer and Stereolithography 4D Printing Technology.

Authors:  Jeong Wook Seo; Su Ryon Shin; Yeon Joo Park; Hojae Bae
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Customized 3D-printed hollow capsular device filled with norfloxacin-loaded micropellets for controlled-release delivery.

Authors:  Purushottam Suryavanshi; Vishal Sharad Chaudhari; Subham Banerjee
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Photoacoustic imaging of 3D-printed vascular networks.

Authors:  Chenshuo Ma; Wanlu Li; Daiwei Li; Maomao Chen; Mian Wang; Laiming Jiang; Luis Santiago Mille; Carlos Ezio Garciamendez; Zhibo Zhao; Qifa Zhou; Yu Shrike Zhang; Junjie Yao
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 7.  How physical techniques improve the transdermal permeation of therapeutics: A review.

Authors:  Yan Gao; Lina Du; Qian Li; Qi Li; Lin Zhu; Meiyan Yang; Xiu Wang; Bonian Zhao; Shan Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  An updated review on application of 3D printing in fabricating pharmaceutical dosage forms.

Authors:  Rabinarayan Parhi; Goutam Kumar Jena
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 5.671

Review 9.  Personalised 3D Printed Medicines: Which Techniques and Polymers Are More Successful?

Authors:  Andrea Alice Konta; Marta García-Piña; Dolores R Serrano
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 10.  Novel Biomaterials Used in Medical 3D Printing Techniques.

Authors:  Karthik Tappa; Udayabhanu Jammalamadaka
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.