Literature DB >> 2718909

An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.

A Garg1.   

Abstract

A laboratory study was conducted to determine the percentage of subjects capable of lifting loads at the maximum permissible limit (MPL) and the corresponding energy expenditure, heart rate, compressive force on the L5/S1 disc, and ratings of perceived exertion. A second objective was to compare MPLs based on measured horizontal distances with those based on the rule of thumb proposed in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) guide (H = 15 + w/2 cm). Thirteen male subjects were required to lift three different boxes (25, 38, and 51 cm wide) at four different frequencies (0.2, 3, 6, and 9 lifts/min) and at two heights (floor level to bench height [0.8 m] and bench height to 1.5 m). Each lift was performed for 1 hr, and horizontal distances for all 13 subjects were measured at the origin of the lifts. MPLs were computed for all lifting tasks. A psychophysical method was used to determine the maximum acceptable weight of a lift. This weight, however, was not allowed to exceed the corresponding MPL. Maximum acceptable weights for all 13 subjects were equal to the MPLs. Of 13 subjects, 9 indicated that they could lift weights significantly greater than the MPLs. MPLs for the bench to 1.5-m height were significantly greater than the corresponding MPLs for the floor to 0.8-m height. The mean heart rate for 1-hr lifting tasks ranged from 104 to 114 beats/min. The estimated compressive force on the L5/S1 disc ranged from 340 to 598 kg. The mean ratings of perceived exertion for floor level to bench height and bench height to 1.5-m lifts were 12 and 9.6 for the back and 9.3 and 13 for the shoulder, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2718909     DOI: 10.1080/15298668991374453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  2 in total

Review 1.  Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications.

Authors:  B Watt; R Grove
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Study protocol title: a prospective cohort study of low back pain.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Kurt T Hegmann; J Steven Moore; Jay Kapellusch; Matthew S Thiese; Sruthi Boda; Parag Bhoyr; Donald Bloswick; Andrew Merryweather; Richard Sesek; Gwen Deckow-Schaefer; James Foster; Eric Wood; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard Holubkov
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.