Chien-Shun Wang1, Yun-Hsuan Tzeng2, Chun-Cheng Lin1, Ching-Kuei Huang1, Ming-Chau Chang1, Chao-Ching Chiang3. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Division of Medical Imaging for Health Management, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan chiagcc@vghtpe.gov.tw.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the influence of sectioning the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) during an extensile lateral approach during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures on ankle joint stability. METHODS: Forty-two patients with calcaneal fractures that received ORIF were included. Talar tilt stress and anterior drawer radiographs were performed on the operative and contralateral ankles 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The average degree of talar tilt on stress radiographs was 3.4 degrees (range, 0-12 degrees) on the operative side and 3.2 degrees (range, 0-14 degrees) on the contralateral side. The mean anterior drawer on stress radiographs of the CFL incised ankle was 6.1 mm (range, 2.4-11.8 mm) and on the contralateral ankle was 5.7 mm (range, 2.6-8.6 mm). There was no statistically significant difference of talar tilt and anterior drawer between the CFL incised side and the contralateral side (P = .658 and .302, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that sectioning of the CFL without any repair during ORIF of a calcaneal fracture does not have a negative effect on stability of the ankle. Repair of the CFL is, thus, probably not necessary following extended lateral approach for ORIF of calcaneal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, comparative study.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the influence of sectioning the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) during an extensile lateral approach during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures on ankle joint stability. METHODS: Forty-two patients with calcaneal fractures that received ORIF were included. Talar tilt stress and anterior drawer radiographs were performed on the operative and contralateral ankles 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The average degree of talar tilt on stress radiographs was 3.4 degrees (range, 0-12 degrees) on the operative side and 3.2 degrees (range, 0-14 degrees) on the contralateral side. The mean anterior drawer on stress radiographs of the CFL incised ankle was 6.1 mm (range, 2.4-11.8 mm) and on the contralateral ankle was 5.7 mm (range, 2.6-8.6 mm). There was no statistically significant difference of talar tilt and anterior drawer between the CFL incised side and the contralateral side (P = .658 and .302, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that sectioning of the CFL without any repair during ORIF of a calcaneal fracture does not have a negative effect on stability of the ankle. Repair of the CFL is, thus, probably not necessary following extended lateral approach for ORIF of calcaneal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, comparative study.