| Literature DB >> 27188622 |
Maryam Khazaee1, Wei Xia2, Gerhard Lackner1, Rafael G Mendes3, Mark Rümmeli3,4,5, Martin Muhler2, Doru C Lupascu1.
Abstract
The syntEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27188622 PMCID: PMC4870618 DOI: 10.1038/srep26208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of oxygen doped MWCNT (a) and nitrogen doped MWCNT (b).
Figure 2HRTEM images of pristine MWCNTs (a), purified MWCNTs (b), OMWCNT-48 (c), OMWCNT-72 (d), NMWCNT-48 (e) and NMWCNT-72 (f). The red arrows indicate the presence of amorphous carbon on pristine MWCNT (a) and the created defects on the functionalized tubes.
Figure 3CO and CO2 profiles of oxygen vapor treated MWCNTs for 48 hours (red) and 72 hours (black) performed in helium at a heating rate of 2 °C min−1.
Determined amount of desorbed CO2 and CO from TPD.
| CNTs | CO2 (mmolg−1) | CO (mmol g−1) |
|---|---|---|
| OMWCNT-48 | 0.65 | 1.3 |
| OMWCNT-72 | 0.643 | 1.61 |
Figure 4FTIR spectra of (a) NMWCNT-72, (b) NMWCNT-48, (c) OMWCNT-72, (d) OMWCNT-48, (e) PMWCNTs and (f) as-received MWCNTs.
Elemental composition of various carbon nanotubes.
| Tube | Elemental analysis (wt%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N | H | O | |
| MWCNT | 98.75 | n.d. | <0.1 | <1 |
| PMWCNT | 98.2 | n.d. | 0.14 | 0.8 |
| OMWCNT-48 | 91.9 | n.d. | <0.1 | 5.55 |
| OMWCNT-72 | 91.8 | n.d. | <0.1 | 6 |
| NMWCNT-48 | 95.3 | 0.89 | 0.13 | 2.58 |
| NMWCNT-72 | 95.55 | 1 | 0.11 | 3.05 |
§The rest elements in the tubes could be metal impurity.
*n.d.: not detected element.
Figure 5Raman spectra of NMWCNT-72 (a), NMWCNT-48 (b), OMWCNT-72 (c), OMWCNT-48 (d), PMWCNT (e), and MWCNT (f). The D-band and G-band were observed at 1335 cm−1 and 1576 cm−1, respectively.
Figure 6TGA curves of pristine MWCNT (I), PMWCNT (II), OMWCNT-48 (III), OMWCNT-72 (IV) (a) and NMWCNT-48 (V), and NMWCNT-72 (VI) (b).
Figure 7Absorbance per optical length measured at λ = 500 nm, A500/l, before centrifugation as a function of nanotubes concentrations.
The dashed line depicts the fitted line to the scattered values of OMWCNT. The inset table shows the calculated extinction coefficient for the tubes.
Figure 8SEM images of dispersed MWCNTs in (a) 1,2 dichlorobenzene, (b) benzyl alcohol, (c) dimethylformamide and (d) chloroform. SEM images of dispersed PMWCNT in (e) 1,2 dichlorobenzene, (f) benzyl alcohol, (g) chlorobenzene and (h) chloroform deposited on Si wafer.
Figure 9SEM images of dispersed oxidized MWCNTs in (a) 1,2 dichlorobenzene, (b) dimethylformamide and (c) chloroform. Second row: SEM images of dispersed nitrogen doped MWCNT in (d) 1,2 dichlorobenzene, (e) dimethylformamide and (f) benzyl alcohol deposited on Si wafer.