| Literature DB >> 27187402 |
Hongqiang Lv1, Jun Liu2, Jiuqiang Han3, An Jiang4.
Abstract
Beam pumping units are widely used in the oil production industry, but the energy efficiency of this artificial lift machinery is generally low, especially for the low-production well and high-production well in the later stage. There are a number of ways for energy savings in pumping units, with the periodic adjustment of stroke speed and rectification of balance deviation being two important methods. In the paper, an energy saving system for a beam pumping unit (ESS-BPU) based on the Internet of Things (IoT) was proposed. A total of four types of sensors, including load sensor, angle sensor, voltage sensor, and current sensor, were used to detect the operating conditions of the pumping unit. Data from these sensors was fed into a controller installed in an oilfield to adjust the stroke speed automatically and estimate the degree of balance in real-time. Additionally, remote supervision could be fulfilled using a browser on a computer or smartphone. Furthermore, the data from a practical application was recorded and analyzed, and it can be seen that ESS-BPU is helpful in reducing energy loss caused by unnecessarily high stroke speed and a poor degree of balance.Entities:
Keywords: Internet of Things; balance degree estimation; beam pumping unit; energy saving; pump dynamometer card; stroke speed adjustment; surface dynamometer card
Year: 2016 PMID: 27187402 PMCID: PMC4883376 DOI: 10.3390/s16050685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overall architecture diagram of the energy saving system.
Figure 2Main hardware components of the energy saving system.
Specifications of the four types of sensors.
| Parameter | Sensor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Load Sensor | Angle Sensor | Voltage Sensor | Current Sensor | |
| Measurement range | 0~120 KN | 0~360° | 0~500 V | 0~100 A |
| Degree of precision | 0.95% | 0.05° | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Temperature range | −30~70℃ | −40~85℃ | −40~70℃ | −40~70℃ |
Figure 3Functional block diagram of the controller.
Figure 4Physical appearance of the controller for stroke speed adjustment and balance estimation. (a) Front panel of the controller; and (b) inner construction of the controller.
Figure 5The energy saving device installed on a beam pumping unit, with the actual assembled positions for the four types of sensors and the controller.
Results of the automatic stroke speed adjustment using this energy saving system on the No. M45 beam pumping unit.
| Stroke Speed | Surface Dynamometer Card | Pump Dynamometer Card | Area of Pump Dynamometer Card |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 min−1 | 50,717.81 | ||
| 5 min−1 | 51,623.65 | ||
| 6 min−1 | 52,245.02 | ||
| 7 min−1 | 43,410.45 | ||
| 8 min−1 | 35,882.41 |
Balance ratio and the corresponding motor power parameters under two different balance states of the No. M45 beam pumping unit.
| Ratio | Maximum Power | Minimum Power | Average Active Power | Average Reactive Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | 11.46 KW | −5.88 KW | 8.24 KW | 5.73 KW |
| 0.92 | 7.90 KW | −3.14 KW | 6.83 KW | 4.75 KW |
Figure 6Partial information of the No. M45 beam pumping unit in the remote supervision platform. (a) Real-time status; and (b) statistics of motor power.