| Literature DB >> 27187341 |
Xiaoke Zheng1, Yingying Ke2, Aozi Feng3, Peipei Yuan4, Jing Zhou5, Yang Yu6, Xiaolan Wang7, Weisheng Feng8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the mechanism by which amentoflavone (AME) improves insulin resistance in a human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line (HepG2).Entities:
Keywords: AME; PI3K-Akt; glucose metabolism; inflammatory cytokines; insulin resistance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27187341 PMCID: PMC6274486 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21050624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Glucose consumption ( ± s, n = 3).
| Group | Glucose Consumption (GC/MTT) |
|---|---|
| NC | 3.85 ± 0.75 |
| MG | 2.67 ± 0.94 #,&& |
| MF | 3.96 ± 0.53 ** |
| AMEI | 3.70 ± 0.34 * |
| AMEII | 3.81 ± 0.07 * |
| AMEIII | 3.66 ± 0.41 * |
#: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &&: p < 0.01 vs. the MF.
The impact of AME on PFK-1, GCK, and PK activity o ( ± s, n = 3).
| Group | PFK-1 (U·L−1) | GCK (U·L−1) | PK (mU·L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1485.91 ± 97.55 | 230.9 ± 5.69 | 221.94 ± 8.36 |
| MG | 1111.60 ± 122.67 ##,&& | 154.48 ± 29.00 ##,&& | 189.10 ± 5.50 # |
| MF | 1464.34 ± 134.67 ** | 221.52 ± 16.74 ** | 216.53 ± 18.26 * |
| AMEI | 1458.57 ± 171.74 * | 259.05 ± 22.75 ** | 218.09 ± 19.26 * |
| AMEII | 1562.65 ± 171.74 ** | 267.10 ± 11.38 **,& | 218.05 ± 23.86 * |
| AMEIII | 1441.22 ± 196.27 * | 238.94 ± 5.69 ** | 217.58 ± 18.49 * |
#: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; ##: p < 0.01 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &: p < 0.05 vs. the MF; &&: p < 0.01 vs. the MF.
The impact of AME on the activity of GSK-3 ( ± s, n = 3).
| Group | GSK-3 (U·L−1) |
|---|---|
| NC | 131.69 ± 1.24 |
| MG | 142.43 ± 6.20 ## |
| MF | 134.55 ± 3.72 * |
| AMEI | 131.09 ± 3.14 ** |
| AMEII | 131.80 ± 6.11 ** |
| AMEIII | 134.66 ± 3.63 * |
##: p < 0.01 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG.
The impact of AME on the activities of PEPCK and G-6-Pase ( ± s, n = 3).
| Group | PEPCK (IU·L−1) | G-6-Pase (mIU·mL−1) |
|---|---|---|
| NC | 38.50 ± 2.40 | 994.99 ± 62.15 |
| MG | 49.22 ± 3.34 ##,& | 1412.45 ± 93.22 # |
| MF | 41.27 ± 2.75 * | 1082.87 ± 62.15 |
| AMEI | 40.92 ± 6.25 * | 1024.28 ± 207.67 * |
| AMEII | 39.19 ± 4.52 * | 1060.90 ± 93.22 * |
| AMEIII | 40.57 ± 4.19 * | 1068.23 ± 166.37 * |
#: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; ##: p < 0.01 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; &: p < 0.05 vs. the MF.
The impact of AME on the levels of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α, CRP ( ± s, n = 3).
| Group | IL-6(ng·L−1) | IL-8(ng·L−1) | TNF-α (pg·mL−1) | CRP (μg·L−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 6.24 ± 4.05 | 247.06 ± 53.08 | 331518.25 ± 24999.24 | 494.72 ± 91.22 |
| MG | 36.48 ± 8.01 ##,&& | 707.00 ± 45.07 ##,&& | 492280.22 ± 68203.98 ##,&& | 1461.54 ± 249.72 ##,&& |
| MF | 11.03 ± 2.54 ** | 247.06 ± 45.07 ** | 333865.14 ± 19046.96 ** | 540.45 ± 203.65 ** |
| AMEI | 34.83 ± 5.21 ##,&& | 694.31 ± 125.63 ##,&& | 433216.82 ± 28692.27 ##,*,&& | 1161.04 ± 133.35 ##,*,&& |
| AMEII | 12.91 ± 9.08 ** | 283.27 ± 99.23 ** | 371806.53 ± 26416.85 ** | 622.10 ± 129.63 ** |
| AMEIII | 28.66 ± 2.44 ##*&& | 524.61 ± 82.33 ##,**,&& | 436815.38 ± 37085.32 ##,*,&& | 1185.54 ± 161.40 ##,*,&& |
##: p < 0.01 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &&: p < 0.01 vs. the MF.
Figure 1The effect of AME on pAkt, Akt, PI3K proteins (n = 3).
Figure 2The effect of AME on pAkt (n = 3). #: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &&: p < 0.01 vs. the MF.
Figure 3The effect of AME on Akt (n = 3). #: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; ##: p < 0.01 vs. the NC; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &: p < 0.05 vs. the MF; &&: p < 0.01 vs. the MF.
Figure 4The effect of AME on PI3K (n = 3). #: p < 0.05 vs. the NC; *: p < 0.05 vs. the MG; **: p < 0.01 vs. the MG; &: p < 0.05 vs. the MF.