Literature DB >> 27187212

Shadowing the wandering mind: how understanding the mind-wandering state can inform our appreciation of conscious experience.

Mahiko Konishi1, Jonathan Smallwood1.   

Abstract

The mind-wandering state illustrates two fundamental aspects of consciousness: its generative nature, which is reflected by the stimulus-independent content of thought that occurs when our minds wander; and metacognition, the unique capacity of the mind to reflect and understand itself. Self-generated thought, which allows us to consider people and events that are not present in the immediate environment, and metacognition, allowing us to introspect and report our inner experiences, are both essential to the scientific study of mind-wandering. Nevertheless, they also inevitably lead to specific issues that mirror more general problems in the field of consciousness research. The generative nature of consciousness makes it difficult to have direct control on the phenomenon, and the act of introspecting on inner experience has the potential to influence the state itself. We illustrate how the field of mind-wandering research can overcome these problems. Its generative nature can be understood by triangulating the objective measures (such as neural function) with subjective measures of experience and it can be manipulated indirectly by varying the demands of the external environment. Furthermore, we describe candidate covert markers for the mind-wandering state, which allow the phenomenon to be observed without direct interference, minimizing the concern that instructions to introspect necessarily change conscious experience. WIREs Cogn Sci 2016, 7:233-246. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1392 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27187212     DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1939-5078


  6 in total

1.  Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A "Goldilocks zone" for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-05

3.  Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Matthew S Welhaf; Natalie E Phillips
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-09

4.  The role of the default mode network in component processes underlying the wandering mind.

Authors:  Giulia L Poerio; Mladen Sormaz; Hao-Ting Wang; Daniel Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Intentional mind-wandering as intentional omission: the surrealist method.

Authors:  Santiago Arango-Muñoz; Juan Pablo Bermúdez
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Spontaneous Cognition and Epistemic Agency in the Cognitive Niche.

Authors:  Regina E Fabry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.