Literature DB >> 27187017

Computational model-informed design and bioprinting of cell-patterned constructs for bone tissue engineering.

Aurélie Carlier1, Gözde Akdeniz Skvortsov, Forough Hafezi, Eleonora Ferraris, Jennifer Patterson, Bahattin Koç, Hans Van Oosterwyck.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly advancing tissue engineering technology that holds great promise for the regeneration of several tissues, including bone. However, to generate a successful 3D bone tissue engineering construct, additional complexities should be taken into account such as nutrient and oxygen delivery, which is often insufficient after implantation in large bone defects. We propose that a well-designed tissue engineering construct, that is, an implant with a specific spatial pattern of cells in a matrix, will improve the healing outcome. By using a computational model of bone regeneration we show that particular cell patterns in tissue engineering constructs are able to enhance bone regeneration compared to uniform ones. We successfully bioprinted one of the most promising cell-gradient patterns by using cell-laden hydrogels with varying cell densities and observed a high cell viability for three days following the bioprinting process. In summary, we present a novel strategy for the biofabrication of bone tissue engineering constructs by designing cell-gradient patterns based on a computational model of bone regeneration, and successfully bioprinting the chosen design. This integrated approach may increase the success rate of implanted tissue engineering constructs for critical size bone defects and also can find a wider application in the biofabrication of other types of tissue engineering constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27187017     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  6 in total

1.  Innovations in Craniofacial Bone and Periodontal Tissue Engineering - From Electrospinning to Converged Biofabrication.

Authors:  Zeynep Aytac; Nileshkumar Dubey; Arwa Daghrery; Jessica A Ferreira; Isaac J de Souza Araújo; Miguel Castilho; Jos Malda; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Int Mater Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 15.750

Review 2.  Systematic review on the application of 3D-bioprinting technology in orthoregeneration: current achievements and open challenges.

Authors:  Rachel L Pan; Kari Martyniak; Makan Karimzadeh; David G Gelikman; Jonathan DeVries; Kelly Sutter; Melanie Coathup; Mehdi Razavi; Rajendra Sawh-Martinez; Thomas J Kean
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-09-19

3.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Its Potential in the Field of Articular Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Vivian H M Mouser; Riccardo Levato; Lawrence J Bonassar; Darryl D D'Lima; Daniel A Grande; Travis J Klein; Daniel B F Saris; Marcy Zenobi-Wong; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A hybrid additive manufacturing platform to create bulk and surface composition gradients on scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Ravi Sinha; Maria Cámara-Torres; Paolo Scopece; Emanuele Verga Falzacappa; Alessandro Patelli; Lorenzo Moroni; Carlos Mota
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Enhanced Piezoelectric Fibered Extracellular Matrix to Promote Cardiomyocyte Maturation and Tissue Formation: A 3D Computational Model.

Authors:  Pau Urdeitx; Mohamed H Doweidar
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Bioprinting and Preliminary Testing of Highly Reproducible Novel Bioink for Potential Skin Regeneration.

Authors:  Forough Hafezi; Susan Shorter; Atabak Ghanizadeh Tabriz; Andrew Hurt; Victoria Elmes; Joshua Boateng; Dennis Douroumis
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.