Hervé R Memiaghe1, James A Lutz2, Lisa Korte3, Alfonso Alonso4, David Kenfack5. 1. Institut de Recherche en Écologie Tropicale (IRET), Libreville, Gabon. 2. Wildland Resources Department, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, United States of America. 3. Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Gamba, Gabon. 4. Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington DC, United States of America. 5. Center for Tropical Forest Science -Forest Global Earth Observatory, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United States of America.
Abstract
Tropical forests have long been recognized for their biodiversity and ecosystem services. Despite their importance, tropical forests, and particularly those of central Africa, remain understudied. Until recently, most forest inventories in Central Africa have focused on trees ≥10 cm in diameter, even though several studies have shown that small-diameter tree population may be important to demographic rates and nutrient cycling. To determine the ecological importance of small-diameter trees in central African forests, we used data from a 25-ha permanent plot that we established in the rainforest of Gabon to study the diversity and dynamics of these forests. Within the plot, we censused 175,830 trees ≥1 cm dbh from 54 families, 192 genera, and 345 species. Average tree density was 7,026 trees/ha, basal area 31.64 m2/ha, and above-ground biomass 369.40 Mg/ha. Fabaceae, Ebenaceae and Euphorbiaceae were the most important families by basal area, density and above-ground biomass. Small-diameter trees (1 cm ≥ dbh <10 cm) comprised 93.7% of the total tree population, 16.5% of basal area, and 4.8% of the above-ground biomass. They also had diversity 18% higher at family level, 34% higher at genus level, and 42% higher at species level than trees ≥10 cm dbh. Although the relative contribution of small-diameter trees to biomass was comparable to other forests globally, their contribution to forest density, and diversity was disproportionately higher. The high levels of diversity within small-diameter classes may give these forests high levels of structural resilience to anthropogenic/natural disturbance and a changing climate.
Tropical forests have long been recognized for their biodiversity and ecosystem services. Despite their importance, tropical forests, and particularly those of central Africa, remain understudied. Until recently, most forest inventories in Central Africa have focused on trees ≥10 cm in diameter, even though several studies have shown that small-diameter tree population may be important to demographic rates and nutrient cycling. To determine the ecological importance of small-diameter trees in central African forests, we used data from a 25-ha permanent plot that we established in the rainforest of Gabon to study the diversity and dynamics of these forests. Within the plot, we censused 175,830 trees ≥1 cm dbh from 54 families, 192 genera, and 345 species. Average tree density was 7,026 trees/ha, basal area 31.64 m2/ha, and above-ground biomass 369.40 Mg/ha. Fabaceae, Ebenaceae and Euphorbiaceae were the most important families by basal area, density and above-ground biomass. Small-diameter trees (1 cm ≥ dbh <10 cm) comprised 93.7% of the total tree population, 16.5% of basal area, and 4.8% of the above-ground biomass. They also had diversity 18% higher at family level, 34% higher at genus level, and 42% higher at species level than trees ≥10 cm dbh. Although the relative contribution of small-diameter trees to biomass was comparable to other forests globally, their contribution to forest density, and diversity was disproportionately higher. The high levels of diversity within small-diameter classes may give these forests high levels of structural resilience to anthropogenic/natural disturbance and a changing climate.
Tropical forests have long been recognized for their biodiversity and ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, habitat provision for vertebrates and invertebrates, and non-timber resources [1-3]. The tropical forest biome extends across three floristic regions—Central and South America, the southeastern Asian-Pacific, and equatorial Africa, all with high biodiversity. The African tropical rainforest has been least studied, and information is lacking regarding tree species diversity and the distribution of structural elements responsible for carbon storage and other ecosystem functions. Because small-diameter trees (here defined as those with less than 10 cm diameter at breast height [dbh, 1.3 m above the ground] and greater than or equal to 1 cm in diameter) are such a visually prevalent element of these forests (Fig 1), we predict that as in other African forests, they would be a much more important component of the forest diversity, structure and biomass than other forests globally.
Fig 1
Representative photos of the four strata of the forest canopy.
(A) Treelets (<10 m tall). (B) Understory trees (10 m to 20 m tall), (C) lower canopy trees (20 m to 30 m tall) and (D) upper canopy trees (≥30 m tall). (E) The plot also features a stream and 11 stumps from past logging of valuable trees (F).
Representative photos of the four strata of the forest canopy.
(A) Treelets (<10 m tall). (B) Understory trees (10 m to 20 m tall), (C) lower canopy trees (20 m to 30 m tall) and (D) upper canopy trees (≥30 m tall). (E) The plot also features a stream and 11 stumps from past logging of valuable trees (F).The small-diameter tree population has often been overlooked because it is not important to timber extraction, and is a much smaller constituent of forest biomass than the larger trees (e.g., [4]). Until recently, most studies in Africa concentrated on large-diameter trees (here defined as those with dbh ≥10 cm; e.g., [5-8]. However, recent studies have shown that the small-diameter tree population may be important to demographic rates and nutrient cycling (e.g., [9]), and that the relative contribution of smaller diameter trees to forest biomass may be higher in tropical Africa than in other tropical and temperate forests (e.g., [10]). Small-diameter trees may also contribute disproportionately to woody plant diversity [11], as many taxa that reach 1 cm dbh are not present at the 10 cm diameter class—potentially much more so in tropical Africa than in other forests.We, therefore, sought to establish a permanent research plot where we could study the unique contributions of smaller diameter trees to the distribution and abundance of all trees, and also to compare the Rabi forest with others in the Smithsonian Center for Tropical Forest Science ForestGEO network of long-term permanent plots [12], including those also located in the Congo basin rainforest—Ituri in Democratic Republic Congo [13], Korup in Cameroon [14], and at Rabi in Gabon (the present study). Previous results from Ituri and Korup showed that tropical African forests have some of the highest proportions of small-diameter trees in the world, both in terms of forest density and contributions to overall biomass [13,15,16]. Similarly, Lin et al. [17] showed that small-diameter trees (1 cm ≤ dbh <10 cm) contributed 10.4% of the biomass in a subtropical forest in China, and Vincent et al. [18] showed that the presence of small-diameter trees contributes to higher local levels of aboveground biomass. Our objectives were to characterize the composition and structure of the forests of Rabi and examine the relative contribution of small-diameter trees to tree abundance, basal area, above-ground biomass, and diversity. We hypothesized that the relative importance of small-diameter trees would be higher than in other forests globally and, therefore, that a comprehensive understanding of tropical African forests requires sampling of small-diameter trees in addition to the current emphasis on larger diameter individuals.
Methods
The research authorization to carry out this study was granted by the Government of Gabon, through the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CENAREST).
Study site
The study site is in the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas (1°50′ to 3°10′ S; 9° 15′ to10° 50′ E) in southwestern Gabon (Fig 2). This region is the southern portion of Guineo-Congolian forest type [14,19-21], which includes swamp and mixed moist semi-evergreen forest types [22]. The Gamba Complex includes two national parks, Loango National Park on the west and Moukalaba Doudou National Park on the east. This area is the largest protected area in Gabon, covering 267,667 km2 or about 4% of the total area of Gabon [20].
Fig 2
Map of the Rabi Forest Monitoring Plot in relation to the Gamba Complex of Protected Areas and the Rabi Oil Concession (Africa and Gabon inset, right).
Rabi is in the northern part of the Gamba Complex between the two national parks. The vegetation is characterized by the abundance of the tree species such as Dichostemma glaucescens, Diogoa zenkeri, Klaineanthus gaboniae, Coula edulis, Crudia gabonensis and Odyendea gabonensis. The most abundant families are Fabaceae, Euphorbiaceae and Olacaceae [21,23]. Family classification follows the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group III [24].Soils are characterized as ferralitic and hydromorphic, with mostly sandy clay (approximately 25% clay) to clay sand (approximately 35% clay) [20]. Temperature throughout the year is almost invariant between 24°C and 28°C [21]. Annual precipitation averages 2299 mm. There are two main seasons, a dry season from June to September with precipitations averaging 24 mm/month and a wet season between October and May when precipitations average 269 mm/month. November and March with averages of 406 mm and 303 mm of rain respectively are the wettest months of the year, while July with an average of 11 mm is the driest month of the year (Shell Gabon unpublished data, 1985 to 2015).The 25-ha permanent plot (plot center 1°55′S, 9°52′W) is orientated southeast—northwest (Fig 3). Plot elevation varies between 32 m and 62 m, and the plot is bisected by a stream surrounded by gentle slopes and three ridges (Fig 3). The forest in the area underwent selective logging, mostly of Lophira alata (Azobe), prior to 1990; there are 11 stumps from felled trees inside the plot (Fig 1F). In addition to the selective logging, seismic assessments were conducted in the area in the 1980s. Seismic assessments involve the temporary use of heavy equipment in localized areas resulting in removal of smaller statured vegetation [25,26]. The forest canopy is generally divided into four strata—treelets, understory, lower canopy trees and upper canopy (Fig 1).
Fig 3
Topographic map of the 25-ha Rabi plot with 1-m contour intervals.
The river flows at the lowest elevations, specifically between the 32-m and 36-m contours.
Topographic map of the 25-ha Rabi plot with 1-m contour intervals.
The river flows at the lowest elevations, specifically between the 32-m and 36-m contours.
Data collection
Field methods followed the standards of the Smithsonian Center for Tropical Forest Science [27]. The 25-ha was divided into 625 quadrats of 20 m × 20 m each. For tree enumeration, each quadrat was in turn divided into 16 subquadrats of 5 m × 5 m. Within each subquadrat, the main stem of every tree ≥1 cm in diameter at breast height (dbh; 1.3 m above ground level) was mapped (subsidiary stems of the same individual were not mapped). If the tree had either an irregularity or a buttress at 1.3 m height, the height of measurement was moved (and recorded) to avoid the irregularity or the buttress.Tree enumeration (diameter measurement, tagging and mapping) was carried out from June 2010 to June 2012. Tree identification was conducted in the field and in herbaria. In the field, trees were grouped into morphospecies—morphologically identical entities—mostly on the basis of vegetative characters. To ensure consistency in the groupings, up to 15 voucher specimens were collected for each morphospecies and compared side-by-side. Over time (2012–2014), flowering and fruiting material were collected for 85% of the morphospecies for further taxonomic identifications at herbaria in Libreville, Leiden and Brussels. Voucher specimens for the Rabi plot are deposited at the National Herbarium of Gabon, the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden, the Missouri Botanical Garden and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History.
Maximum height at maturity
The classification of Rabi species into life-forms followed Kenfack et al. [14]. Each species was assigned to one of the following four life-forms according to the maximum height that they attain at maturity, using information from the literature and our field observations. Trees that do not normally reach 10 m in height and are <10 cm dbh were classified as treelets; understory trees were those 10 m to 20 m tall and 10 cm to 30 cm dbh; lower canopy included trees 20 m to 30 m tall and 30 cm to 60 cm dbh; and finally, upper canopy trees were defined as those reaching >30 m in height and >60 cm dbh.
Data Analyses
Because most forest inventory plots in Central Africa are 1 ha in area and include only trees ≥10 cm dbh, for comparison we calculated abundances, basal area, Fisher’s diversity and aboveground biomass (AGB) per hectare and for two diameter classes; 1 cm ≤ dbh <10 cm and ≥10 cm. Diversity was analyzed at the levels of families, genera and species. Aboveground biomass was estimated for each individual tree (including all stems for multi-stemmed trees) using the dbh and the wood density allometric equation
from Chave et al. [28], where AGB is aboveground dry biomass (in kg), ρ the wood density (g/cm3), D the dbh (in cm), ln the natural logarithm, and exp the exponential function. Frequency was calculated based on the 20 m × 20m quadrats that make up the plot. Abundance-diameter relationships were calculated with 1 cm bins. All analyses were performed using version 3.4.2 of R [29] and the CTFS R package (http://ctfs.arnarb.harvard.edu/Public/CTFSRPackage/index.php/web).
Results
Floristics and diversity
We found 345 morphospecies within the 25-ha plot, of which 294 (85.2%) were identified to species and the remaining 51 (14.8%) to genus level. Six of the species identified to genus level have been confirmed to be new to science, and we expect that others will be confirmed as new to science when fertile material can be collected for these morphospecies. Three species in the plot were recorded in Gabon for the first time, Okoubaka aubrevillei Pellegr (Santalaceae) & Normand, Magnistipula multinervia Burgt (Chrysobalanaceae), and Beilschmiedia auriculata Robyns & R. Wilczek (Lauraceae). Because field identification was carried out for some portions of the plot several months after tree enumeration and mapping, a total of 2,109 individual trees were dead when they were revisited and not identified nor included in the analysis.The 345 morphospecies belong to 54 families and 192 genera. Rubiaceae, with 57 species in 32 genera, was the most diverse family, followed by Fabaceae that had 43 species in 26 genera. Other diverse families in the plot included Annonaceae (17 species in 9 genera), Phyllanthaceae (16 species in 10 genera) and Anacardiaceae (16 species in 2 genera) (see S1 Appendix for a complete listing of species). The genera Trichoscypha and Diospyros were the richest with 14 and 12 species respectively, followed by Beilschmiedia (8), Maesobotrya, Memecylon, and Xylopia, each with seven species. Of these genera, Trichoscypha, Beilschmiedia and Memecylon had the highest number of unidentified species (S1 Appendix).The small-diameter tree group comprised 333 species (96% of the total) in 185 genera and 52 families, while 233 species in 137 genera and 44 families were recorded among large-diameter trees. There were 207 species/ha for all trees in the plot, 201 species/ha for small-diameter trees, as compared to only 84 species/ha for large-diameter trees (Table 1). Fisher’s α for all trees was 40.1 per ha, almost the same (39.4/ha) for small-diameter trees, but lower for large diameter-trees (30.8/ha).
Table 1
Comparison of the small-diameter (1 cm ≥ dbh <10 cm) and large-diameter (dbh ≥10cm) tree contribution to structure and diversity of the Rabi 25-ha plot.
Numbers in parenthesis represent standard deviation or percentages.
≥ 1 cm
<10 cm
≥ 10 cm
All families
54
52 (96.3%)
44 (81.5%)
All genera
194
187 (96.4%)
139 (71.6%)
All species
345
333 (96.5%)
234 (67.8%)
All trees
175,660
164,491 (93.6%)
11,170 (6.4%)
Total Basal area (m2)
791.23
130.73 (16.5%)
660.60 (83.5%)
Total aboveground biomass (Mg)
9,235.18
458.32 (5.0%)
8,777.01 (95.0%)
Mean density per ha
7026 (660)
6,580 (644)
447 (31)
Mean number of species per ha
207 (12)
201 (12)
84 (8)
Mean Fishers α per ha
40.1 (3.3)
39.4 (3.4)
30.8 (4.6)
Mean basal area per ha
31.65 (4.11)
5.23 (0.55)
26.42 (3.94)
Mean AGB per ha
369.41 (82.30)
18.33 (2.11)
351.08 (81.83)
Comparison of the small-diameter (1 cm ≥ dbh <10 cm) and large-diameter (dbh ≥10cm) tree contribution to structure and diversity of the Rabi 25-ha plot.
Numbers in parenthesis represent standard deviation or percentages.
Abundances
In the 25-ha plot, a total of 175,830 trees were recorded, with an average density of 7,026 individuals/ha. Small-diameter trees were 14 times more abundant than large-diameter trees. There were 164,491 small-diameter trees (93.6% of all stems), averaging 6580 individuals/ha, while large-diameter trees had a density of only 447 individuals/ha (Table 1). The families Euphorbiaceae, and Fabaceae were the most abundant, with densities >1000 individuals/ha, followed by Ebenaceae, Anacardiaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Rubiaceae, and Clusiaceae (Fig 4). Among genera, Dichostemma and Crotonogyne, both of the family Euphorbiaceae, were the most abundant, with >570 individuals/ha, followed by Diospyros, Garcinia, Trichoscypha, Tetraberlinia, Gilbertiodendron and Campylospermum (Table 2).
Fig 4
The Density (A), basal area (B), and aboveground live biomass (C) of the ten most abundant tree families in the Rabi plot.
Whiskers indicate the 2.5% and 97.5% values of the 25, 100 m × 100 m individual hectares of the plot.
Table 2
The 20 most abundant tree genera in the 25-ha Rabi plot ranked by density.
Basal area and above-ground biomass (AGB) rank indicated in parenthesis.
Genus
Density (trees/ha)
Basal area (m2/ha)
AGB (Mg/ha)
Dichostemma
683.9
1.4 (2)
5.7 (23)
Crotonogyne
573.1
0.2 (42)
0.4 (84)
Diospyros
552.4
0.7 (12)
4.5 (26)
Garcinia
348.1
0.5 (24)
2.5 (35)
Trichoscypha
294.5
0 (186)
1.2 (57)
Tetraberlinia
290.5
0.9 (9)
32.3 (1)
Gilbertiodendron
266.5
1.6 (1)
18.8 (3)
Campylospermum
250.2
0.2 (41)
0.9 (63)
Pancovia
175.8
0.5 (26)
2.7 (34)
Piptostigma
131.2
0.2 (51)
0.4 (86)
Warneckea
126.5
0.1 (179)
1.9 (44)
Maesobotrya
123.6
0.2 (45)
0.9 (64)
Calpocalyx
122.8
0.4 (30)
2.7 (33)
Sorindeia
121.8
0.3 (37)
1.2 (56)
Protomegabaria
119.8
0.5 (27)
3.1 (31)
Dialium
109.6
0.6 (19)
6.9 (17)
Diogoa
100.7
0.6 (20)
5.1 (24)
Didelotia
82.1
0.9 (8)
11.3 (7)
Dactyladenia
81.1
0.6 (18)
6.6 (21)
Anisophyllea
72.4
0.6 (15)
6.8 (20)
The Density (A), basal area (B), and aboveground live biomass (C) of the ten most abundant tree families in the Rabi plot.
Whiskers indicate the 2.5% and 97.5% values of the 25, 100 m × 100 m individual hectares of the plot.
The 20 most abundant tree genera in the 25-ha Rabi plot ranked by density.
Basal area and above-ground biomass (AGB) rank indicated in parenthesis.At species level, Dichostemma glaucescens and Crotonogyne gabonensis were the most abundant with densities > 500 individuals/ha, followed by Garcinia smeathmannii and Campylospermum congestum with densities >200 individuals/ha (Table 3). See S1 Appendix for complete listings of density, basal area and above ground biomass by family, genus, and species.
Table 3
The 20 most abundant tree species in the 25-ha Rabi plot ranked by density.
Basal area and above-ground biomass (AGB) rank indicated in parenthesis.
Species
Density (trees/ha)
Basal area (m2/ha)
AGB (Mg/ha)
Dichostemma glaucescens
683.9
1.4 (1)
5.7 (21)
Crotonogyne gabonensis
573.1
0.2 (43)
0.4 (107)
Garcinia smeathmannii
304.3
0.4 (28)
1.9 (46)
Campylospermum congestum
213.8
0.1 (96)
0.7 (80)
Diospyros obliquifolia
191.1
0.1 (149)
0.3 (128)
Pancovia sp. nov.
175.8
0.5 (23)
2.7 (38)
Diospyros sp. nov.
158.3
0.1 (151)
0.2 (145)
Tetraberlinia moreliana
149.7
0 (306)
19.8 (2)
Gilbertiodendron ogoouense
135.8
0.7 (9)
7.0 (15)
Piptostigma multinervium
131.2
0.2 (54)
0.4 (114)
Tetraberlinia bifoliolata
123.3
0.9 (6)
9.2 (9)
Calpocalyx dinklagei
121.9
0.3 (33)
1.5 (54)
Protomegabaria stapfiana
119.7
0.5 (24)
3.1 (36)
Warneckea floribunda
109.3
0 (336)
1.4 (56)
Sorindeia gabonensis
103.8
0.2 (55)
1.1 (64)
Diogoa zenkeri
100.7
0.6 (13)
5.1 (23)
Gilbertiodendron unijugum
79.0
0.4 (29)
2.9 (37)
Diospyros hoyleana
75.5
0.2 (47)
0.9 (68)
Trichoscypha sp.8
69.9
<0.1 (327)
0.2 (158)
Amanoa strobilacea
65.5
0.9 (5)
11.1 (6)
The 20 most abundant tree species in the 25-ha Rabi plot ranked by density.
Basal area and above-ground biomass (AGB) rank indicated in parenthesis.Tree abundances declined rapidly with increasing diameter. The forest structure at Rabi follows a declining exponential distribution, with steeper declines at diameters >50 cm dbh (Fig 5). For all species and all diameters, abundance decreased with a slope of -2.63 on a log-log scale (Fig 5) although some species (e.g., Tetraberlinia moreliana) declined more gradually. Small-diameter trees, especially treelet lifeforms, declined rapidly within the 1 cm to 10 cm dbh range (Fig 5).
Fig 5
Abundance-diameter relationships for trees within the 25-ha Rabi plot.
The relationship between diameter and abundance for all trees (A) has a linear decline in log-log coordinates of z = -2.63 (R2 = 0.96). An abundant canopy tree, Tetraberlinia moreliana (B), which includes the largest individual tree in the plot, and is well represented in all diameter classes, declines less sharply (z = -1.29, R2 = 0.81), and four treelet species, Coffea mayombensis (C; R2 = 0.60), Oncoba flagelliflora (D; R2 = 0.95), Placodiscus caudatus (E; R2 = 0.82), and Rinorea gabunensis (F; R2 = 0.80), have very steep declines in abundance with increasing diameter. One individual of Coffea mayombensis (dbh = 14.9 cm) and three individuals of Placodiscus caudatus (dbh = 10.1 cm, 10.2 cm, and 13.4 cm) not shown, but included in calculations. All relationships P <0.001.
Abundance-diameter relationships for trees within the 25-ha Rabi plot.
The relationship between diameter and abundance for all trees (A) has a linear decline in log-log coordinates of z = -2.63 (R2 = 0.96). An abundant canopy tree, Tetraberlinia moreliana (B), which includes the largest individual tree in the plot, and is well represented in all diameter classes, declines less sharply (z = -1.29, R2 = 0.81), and four treelet species, Coffea mayombensis (C; R2 = 0.60), Oncoba flagelliflora (D; R2 = 0.95), Placodiscus caudatus (E; R2 = 0.82), and Rinorea gabunensis (F; R2 = 0.80), have very steep declines in abundance with increasing diameter. One individual of Coffea mayombensis (dbh = 14.9 cm) and three individuals of Placodiscus caudatus (dbh = 10.1 cm, 10.2 cm, and 13.4 cm) not shown, but included in calculations. All relationships P <0.001.Species with the greatest frequency of occurrence were the understory trees Garcia smeathmannii (91% of 625 quadrats) and Pancovia sp. (82%); the lower canopy trees Diogoa zenkeri (89%), and the treelet Crotonogyne gabonensis (84%). The high number of small trees is driven by four treelet species, Coffea mayombensis (Rubiaceae), Oncoba flagelliflora (Salicaceae), Rinorea gabunensis (Violaceae), and Placodiscus caudatus (Sapindaceae) (Fig 4). A total of 104 species (30%) had densities of less than one individual per ha, of which 32 species were represented by only one individual in the 25-ha plot.
Basal Area
Total basal area was 791.23 m2 (31.65± 4.11 m2/ha) and was dominated by Fabaceae (11.37 m2/ha; 35.9% of total), followed by Euphorbiaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Ochnaceae, Simaroubaceae and Burseraceae. The dominant genera by basal area were Tetraberlinia, Gilbertiodendron, Odyendea, Dischostemma, Eurypetalum and Lophira. At species level, Tetraberlinia moreliana was the most important, followed by Odyendyea gabonensis, Dichostemma glaucescens, Eurypetalum tessmannii, Lophira alata and Tetraberlinia bifoliolata (Table 3). Small-diameter trees contributed 16.5% of the total basal area.
Aboveground biomass
Total aboveground biomass for the 25-ha plot was 9235.18 Mg, averaging 369.41±82.3 Mg/ha for all trees ≥1cm dbh. Fabaceae had the highest AGB (150 Mg/ha), followed by Ochnaceae (33 Mg/ha), Phyllanthaceae (16 Mg/ha), Burseraceae (14 Mg/ha) and Euphorbiaceae (14 Mg/ha). At genus level, Tetraberlinia and Lophira were the most important (Table 4). Lophira alata was the most important species in terms of aboveground biomass, followed by Tetraberlina moreliana, Eurypetalum tessmannii and Librevillea klainei. The aboveground biomass of small-diameter trees was 18 Mg/ha, approximately 5% of the total biomass (Table 4). AGB for large-diameter trees was 351 Mg/ha.
Table 4
Comparison of the number of species, abundances, basal area and aboveground biomass (percent of total in parentheses) between small-diameter trees (1 cm ≥ dbh <10 cm) and large-diameter trees with (dbh ≥10cm) per tree life form in the Rabi plot.
≥ 1 cm
<10 cm
≥ 10 cm
Species
Treelets
105 (30.4%)
105 (30.4%)
14 (4.1%)
Understory
96 (27.8%)
95 (27.5%)
88 (25.5%)
Lower canopy
83 (24.1%)
79 (22.9%)
78 (22.6%)
Upper canopy
61 (17.7%)
54 (15.7%)
54 (15.7%)
Totals
345
333 (96.5%)
234 (67.8%)
Abundance
Treelets
38,474 (22.1%)
38,413 (22.1%)
61 (<0.1%)
Understory
55,605 (32.0%)
53,084 (30.6%)
2,520 (1.5%)
Lower canopy
53,331 (30.7%)
48,558 (28.0%)
4,769 (2.8%)
Upper canopy
26,311 (15.1%)
22,632 (13.0%)
3,674 (2.1%)
Totals
173,721
162,687 (93.6%)
11,024 (6.4%)
Basal Area (m2)
Treelets
15.63 (2.0%)
14.8 (1.9%)
0.83 (0.1%)
Understory
91.42 (11.7%)
44.98 (5.8%)
46.44 (5.9%)
Lower canopy
221.99 (28.4%)
46.29 (5.9%)
175.7 (22.5%)
Upper canopy
452.83 (57.9%)
23.28 (3.0%)
429.56 (55.0%)
Totals
781.87
129.35 (16.6%)
652.53 (83.5%)
Aboveground Biomass (Mg)
Treelets
55.39 (0.6%)
50.26 (0.6%)
5.13 (0.1%)
Understory
549.14 (6.0%)
171.04 (1.9%)
378.1 (4.1%)
Lower canopy
2,019.66 (22.1%)
154.02 (1.7%)
1,865.64 (20.4%)
Upper canopy
6,512.31 (71.3%)
89.71 (1.0%)
6,422.60 (70.3%)
Totals
9,136.50
465.03 (5.1%)
8,671.47 (94.9%)
Forest structure by lifeform
Among the 345 species in the Rabi plot, there were 105 treelet species, with diameters mostly restricted to <10 cm. These accounted for 22% of the total number of individuals in the plot, but only 2% of basal area and 0.6% of aboveground biomass respectively (Table 4). Three of the 20 most abundant species in the plot were treelets, Crotonogyne gabonensis, Campylospermum congestum and Diospyros sp. nov. (Table 4). The remaining 240 species comprised 96 understory, 83 lower canopy and 61 upper canopy species, all of which reach more than 10 m in height and dbh ≥10 cm at maturity. These species represented 78% of the total number of trees, 98% of the total basal area and 99% of the total aboveground biomass.Small-diameter trees comprised all 105 species of treelets, but also 95%, 91% and 86% of understory, lower canopy and upper canopy species respectively. Treelets accounted for 23.6% of the total individuals, 11.5% of the basal area and 10.8% of the aboveground biomass in this diameter size class. Understory and canopy species had at least 88% of their species among these small-diameter trees, and accounted for 78.4% of all trees, 85% of the basal area and 89% of the aboveground biomass of small-diameter trees. Among trees with dbh ≥10 cm, there were only 14 species of treelets, representing a tiny fraction of their total individuals, total basal area and of the aboveground biomass in this diameter class. Conversely upper canopy species with 33% of the individual accounted for 66% of the basal area and 74% of the aboveground biomass in this diameter class (Table 4).
Discussion
Although there have been some concerted effort in the recent past towards long-term monitoring of tropical African forests (e.g., the African Tropical Rainforest Observation Network; http://www.afritron.org), studies that include small-diameter trees are still uncommon, especially in the Congo Basin. The 25-ha Rabi plot is only the third large continuous patch of forest in Africa within which all trees with dbh ≥1cm are censused. Our results show clear differences in species diversity, abundances, basal area and aboveground biomass between small- and large-diameter trees. As in Korup and Ituri forests [13-15], lowering the sampling diameter to 1 cm in the Rabi plot increased the interpretation of the total diversity and the density of species.Small-diameter trees were more diverse than large-diameter trees in the Rabi plot based on Fisher’s α. At least 30% of the species in the plot were treelets that achieve reproductive maturity in the forest understory and never attain 10 cm dbh. In addition to these treelets, small-diameter trees comprised saplings of all other understory and canopy tree species that do regenerate.Tree density in the Rabi plot was comparable to other tropical African and temperate forests (Table 5). The African plots have generally higher proportions (92% to 95%) of small-diameter trees compared to other tropical plots, but the plot at Sinharaja, Sri Lanka was comparable. Temperate plots or dry tropical plots have much lower proportions (30% to 70%) of small-diameter trees, perhaps because of the combination of climatic limitations and repeated low intensity disturbance from fire or herbivory. The Rabi plot was notable in the steepness of the decline in the abundance-diameter relationship (Fig 5, Table 5). When only large-diameter trees are considered, the Rabi forest is dominated by Fabaceae, Olacaceae and Euphorbiaceae, which is in agreement with previous forest inventories in the area that used smaller plots (0.1 ha) with a 5 cm minimum diameter [21,23]. As in the Korup plot in Cameroon, Dichostemma glaucescens was the most abundant canopy species [14]. The abundance of small-diameter trees in the Rabi forest is not unique. Indeed, the high density of small trees has been reported in the Congo Basin [13,14] and in other tropical forests worldwide [16,30-32], and stands in contrast to densities in temperate plots (e.g., [33,34]). For example, within the Rabi plot, small-diameter trees account for 93.6% of all trees while in the 50-ha plot in Korup, they make up 92.4%. Small-diameter trees in Rabi were predominantly composed of saplings of understory and canopy tree species (76.4% of all trees in this size class). Saplings are more vulnerable to environmental fluctuations as well as damaging agents such as browsing herbivores and being crushed by windfalls. Long-term monitoring of this life stage is crucial to understanding the demography of canopy species as well as possible changes to forest composition driven by global change [12].
Table 5
Comparison of the Rabi, Gabon plot to other African CTFS plots and to tropical plots in South America and Asia, as well as two temperate plots in the USA.
African CTFS plots have a higher proportion of small-diameter trees than other tropical plots, and many more than temperate plots. Z represents the negative exponent of the abundance-diameter relationship (see Methods).
CTFS-ForestGEO Site
Country
Area (ha)
Census year
Trees dbh≥ 1cm (Ind./ha)
Trees dbh<10 cm (Ind./ha)
Trees dbh≥ 10 cm (Ind./ha)
Trees dbh<10 cm (%)
Z
Rabi
Gabon
25
2013
7,026.4
6,579.7
446.8
93.6
2.6
Ituri-Lenda
DR Congo
20
1995
6,843.6
6,486.0
357.6
94.8
2.1
Ituri-Edoro
DR Congo
20
1995
8,112.1
7,673.5
438.6
94.6
2.1
Sinharaja
Sri Lanka
25
1995
8,215.0
7,537.5
677.5
91.8
2.1
Korup
Cameroon
50
1999
6,580.6
6,070.7
509.9
92.3
2.0
Lambir
Malaysia
52
1997
6,915.5
6,277.5
638.0
90.8
2.0
BCI
Panama
50
2000
4,276.1
3,852.0
424.1
90.1
1.9
Pasoh
Malaysia
50
2000
6,118.9
5,553.3
565.6
90.8
1.9
Yasuni
Ecuador
25
1997
6,094.2
5,392.3
701.9
88.5
1.9
Mudumalai
India
50
2000
360.5
109.0
251.6
30.2
1.2
Yosemite
USA
25.6
2010
1,346.1
818.1
528.0
60.8
2.0
Wind River
USA
25.6
2011
1,209.9
884.7
325.3
73.1
1.8
Comparison of the Rabi, Gabon plot to other African CTFS plots and to tropical plots in South America and Asia, as well as two temperate plots in the USA.
African CTFS plots have a higher proportion of small-diameter trees than other tropical plots, and many more than temperate plots. Z represents the negative exponent of the abundance-diameter relationship (see Methods).That forest basal area and biomass is disproportionately carried in the large-diameter trees could make the forest at Rabi less resilient to short-term environmental change or disturbance. If the large-diameter individuals were killed, either through disturbance, disease, or human agency, the higher Z, relative to other forests (Table 5) suggests that it could take a relatively longer time for smaller-diameter trees to advance to the overstory. However, the diversity and abundance of the small-diameter trees suggests that the forest could have the ability to respond to disturbances in general. The ability of the forest to recover from disturbances affecting small-diameter trees through the regeneration of small-diameter trees suggests a high level of structural resilience—the perpetration of the existing diameter distribution within the forest. Small-diameter trees. Aboveground biomass in Rabi averaged 351 Mg/ha for trees ≥ 1cm which is lower than the estimated African mean of 395.7 Mg [32]. This lower value is probably due to the prevalence of small-diameter trees in this forest, and the limited selective logging of large-diameter trees that occurred two decades previously (site examination suggests that only the 11 large trees were removed). Small-diameter trees in the Rabi plot stored 5.0% of the total biomass while in the Korup plot, they accounted for 5.7% of the total biomass. This result is in agreement with the assumption that in mature tropical forests, the biomass of small-diameter trees is approximately 5% of the total aboveground biomass [25,33,34]. Our study also confirms that large-diameter trees store the bulk of biomass in tropical forests. In Rabi, 95% of the biomass is stored in trees with dbh ≥ 10 cm. Within this diameter class, upper canopy trees, comprised only 2% of the total individual trees in the plot, but stored 70% of the total biomass. Therefore, the contribution of small-diameter trees to biomass may be approximated based on forest type averages and forest AGB can be estimated from the few large trees [4,33], thereby avoiding the labor intensive work of censusing the small-diameter trees. However the demography of small-diameter trees is important to predicting the long-term change in above-ground biomass of the forest. For example, in subtropical evergreen broad leaved forests of China, Lin et al. [17] showed that small-diameter trees contributed 10.4% of the total above ground biomass, more than trees ≥50 cm dbh. Therefore the dynamics of the small-diameter trees in this forest could be relatively more important to overall ecosystem function—an opposite conclusion from many studies emphasizing large-diameter trees (e.g., [4,30,34]).As the Congo Basin forest is considered to be the second most important forested region on earth after the Amazon, it is crucial that more comprehensive long-term studies including small diameter trees be implemented throughout its range.
Abundance, basal area, and aboveground biomass (AGB) of woody species ≥1 cm dbh in the 25-ha Rabi forest plot, Gabon.
Authors: J Chave; C Andalo; S Brown; M A Cairns; J Q Chambers; D Eamus; H Fölster; F Fromard; N Higuchi; T Kira; J-P Lescure; B W Nelson; H Ogawa; H Puig; B Riéra; T Yamakura Journal: Oecologia Date: 2005-06-22 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Helene C Muller-Landau; Richard S Condit; Kyle E Harms; Christian O Marks; Sean C Thomas; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; George Chuyong; Leonardo Co; Stuart Davies; Robin Foster; Savitri Gunatilleke; Nimal Gunatilleke; Terese Hart; Stephen P Hubbell; Akira Itoh; Abd Rahman Kassim; David Kenfack; James V LaFrankie; Daniel Lagunzad; Hua Seng Lee; Elizabeth Losos; Jean-Remy Makana; Tatsuhiro Ohkubo; Cristian Samper; Raman Sukumar; I-Fang Sun; M N Nur Supardi; Sylvester Tan; Duncan Thomas; Jill Thompson; Renato Valencia; Martha Isabel Vallejo; Gorky Villa Muñoz; Takuo Yamakura; Jess K Zimmerman; Handanakere Shavaramaiah Dattaraja; Shameema Esufali; Pamela Hall; Fangliang He; Consuelo Hernandez; Somboon Kiratiprayoon; Hebbalalu S Suresh; Christopher Wills; Peter Ashton Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: James V LaFrankie; Peter S Ashton; George B Chuyong; Leonardo Co; Richard Condit; Stuart J Davies; Robin Foster; Stephen P Hubbell; David Kenfack; Daniel Lagunzad; Elizabeth C Losos; Noor Supardi Md Nor; Sylvester Tan; Duncan W Thomas; Renato Valencia; Gorky Villa Journal: Ecology Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: S Joseph Wright; Kaoru Kitajima; Nathan J B Kraft; Peter B Reich; Ian J Wright; Daniel E Bunker; Richard Condit; James W Dalling; Stuart J Davies; Sandra Díaz; Bettina M J Engelbrecht; Kyle E Harms; Stephen P Hubbell; Christian O Marks; Maria C Ruiz-Jaen; Cristina M Salvador; Amy E Zanne Journal: Ecology Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: David L Erickson; Frank A Jones; Nathan G Swenson; Nancai Pei; Norman A Bourg; Wenna Chen; Stuart J Davies; Xue-Jun Ge; Zhanqing Hao; Robert W Howe; Chun-Lin Huang; Andrew J Larson; Shawn K Y Lum; James A Lutz; Keping Ma; Madhava Meegaskumbura; Xiangcheng Mi; John D Parker; I Fang-Sun; S Joseph Wright; Amy T Wolf; W Ye; Dingliang Xing; Jess K Zimmerman; W John Kress Journal: Front Genet Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: J-F Bastin; N Barbier; M Réjou-Méchain; A Fayolle; S Gourlet-Fleury; D Maniatis; T de Haulleville; F Baya; H Beeckman; D Beina; P Couteron; G Chuyong; G Dauby; J-L Doucet; V Droissart; M Dufrêne; C Ewango; J F Gillet; C H Gonmadje; T Hart; T Kavali; D Kenfack; M Libalah; Y Malhi; J-R Makana; R Pélissier; P Ploton; A Serckx; B Sonké; T Stevart; D W Thomas; C De Cannière; J Bogaert Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Kyle M Meyer; Hervé Memiaghe; Lisa Korte; David Kenfack; Alfonso Alonso; Brendan J M Bohannan Journal: ISME J Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Georgia de Jong Cleyndert; Aida Cuni-Sanchez; Hamidu A Seki; Deo D Shirima; Pantaleo K T Munishi; Neil Burgess; Kim Calders; Robert Marchant Journal: Carbon Balance Manag Date: 2020-12-07