Literature DB >> 27186180

Comparison of results of endovascular stenting and bypass grafting for TransAtlantic Inter-Society (TASC II) type B, C and D iliac occlusive disease.

Rimantas Benetis1, Zana Kavaliauskiene2, Aleksandras Antusevas2, Rytis Stasys Kaupas3, Donatas Inciura2, Sarunas Kinduris1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The priority use of endovascular techniques in the management of aortoiliac occlusive disease has increased in the last decade. The aim of the present article is to report 1- and 2-year results of iliac artery stenting (IAS) and aortoiliac grafting in the management of patients with TASC II type B, C and D iliac lesions and chronic limb ischaemia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomised, one-centre clinical study, iliac artery stents and vascular grafts used for the treatment of patients with symptomatic lesions in the iliac artery were evaluated. This study enrolled 2 groups: 54 patients in the stent group and 47 patient in the surgery group.
RESULTS: The primary patency rates at 1 and 2 years were 83% and 79.9% after IAS and 97.1% and 97.1% after surgical reconstruction, respectively (p = 0.015). The assisted primary stent patency at 1 and 2 years was 87.9% and 78.2%, respectively. The complication rate was 7.4% in the stent group and 6.3% in the surgery group. There was no perioperative mortality in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal that patients with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (TASC II types B, C and D) can be treated with IAS or surgically with satisfactory results. Iliac artery stenting is associated with decreased primary patency compared with the surgery group. Iliac artery stenting should be considered with priority in elderly patients or in patients with severe comorbidities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortoiliac grafting; aortoiliac occlusive disease; aortoiliac stenting; complications; outcomes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27186180      PMCID: PMC4848365          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Nowadays, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting are the methods of choice for the treatment of iliac artery atherosclerotic lesions. Lesions in the aortoiliac segment have been categorised according to their localisation, extension and morphology (stenosis vs. occlusion), with implications for their treatment. According to the recommendations of the Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II) document, endovascular therapy is the treatment of choice for type A lesions and surgery is the treatment of choice for type D lesions [1]. Patients with type B and C lesions can be managed by either stenting or bypass surgery depending on the patient's medical comorbidities [1]. The new type of stents and the recent advances in endovascular techniques have led to an extension of the indications to more extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease, with satisfactory long-term results [2-4]. The authors reported 1-year primary stent patency rates to be from 85% to 93% and 5-year primary patency rates from 70% to 80.5% in TASC II type D lesions [5-7]. According to these results, endovascular treatment of iliac artery occlusion can be successfully performed in older patients with severe cardiac pathology as an alternative method to open surgery without vascular prosthesis implantation and the risk of graft infection. Moreover, the risks of surgery are significantly greater than the risks of endovascular treatment, not only in terms of mortality, but also in terms of major morbidity and delay in return to normal activities [1]. In previous studies, researchers compared results of aortoiliac stenting (AIS) and bypass grafting for TASC types C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease [8, 9]. It was observed that AIS was associated with decreased primary patency at 48 months and shorter hospital stay [8].

Material and methods

Between 15 April 2011 and 15 April 2013, 316 patients underwent angiography with a diagnosis of aortoiliac atherosclerotic disease. Of these, 101 consecutive patients underwent treatment of iliac artery occlusive disease stratified as TASC II type B, C and D iliac lesions [1]. Among these, 62 iliac endovascular procedures (87 stents) were performed in 54 patients (stent group) and 47 direct aortoiliac bypass reconstructions were performed in 47 patients (surgery group). The patients in the stent group were included in the study if their stenotic or occlusive lesion of the iliac arteries was considered suitable for stenting and successful lesion passage was achieved. If recanalisation of an iliac artery was not possible, the patients were also subsequently treated by open surgery. The analyses excluded patients with TASC II type A lesions, abdominal aorta or iliac artery aneurysms and extra-anatomic bypasses. All the patients were prospectively evaluated for their early, 1- and 2-year stent and vascular graft patency. The study protocol was approved by the local bioethics committee. All the patients had evidence of chronic limb ischaemia classified according to Rutherford. The patients’ demographic data, procedural and lesion-specific factors, outcomes and complications were defined according to the criteria prepared and revised by the Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards [10, 11]. The endovascular procedures were performed in the angiography suite under the control of Innova 350 (GE Medical Systems, USA) by an interventional radiologist. Under local anaesthesia, an ipsilateral or a contralateral approach with a 6-French introducer was used depending on the clinical situation. Perioperative anticoagulation with heparin 5000 IU was performed. Balloon-expandable (BE) stents (Visi-Pro, EV3 and SCUBA, Medtronic/Invatec) were used preferentially for more focal lesions and severely calcified lesions. Self-expandable stents (PROTEGE EverFlex, EV3; Absolute, Abbott; Misago, Terumo; MARIS PLUS, Medtronic/Invatec) were usually placed for a diseased long segment or when the contralateral approach for stenting was used. The length of lesions was categorized according to the criteria of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR) [12] and was classified into 3 categories: lesions of 3–5 cm, lesions of 5–10 cm, and lesions greater than 10 cm in length. After stent implantation, aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) were prescribed for 6 months [13]. After 6 months, aspirin (100 mg/day) was recommended for life-long use. Direct aortoiliac bypass operations were performed in an operating room under general anaesthesia via a transperitoneal approach and unilateral bypass procedures via a retroperitoneal approach under epidural anaesthesia. Collagen-coated woven polyester prostheses (Polythese R IC/ICT, Perouse medical) were used for all the bilateral aortoiliac surgical reconstructions, whereas polyester Vascutek Gelseal (Terumo) prostheses were usually used for unilateral bypass reconstructions. After synthetic vascular graft implantation, aspirin (100 mg per day) and clopidogrel (75 mg per day) were prescribed for 6 months. After stent or prosthesis implantations, the patients were followed up 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months during the first year and 6 months after. Follow-up was obtained in all the patients and was performed using Duplex ultrasound. The clinical assessment consisted of physical examination, symptomatic evaluation and ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) measurements. The indications for secondary interventions included clinical symptoms associated with a > 0.15 increase in the ABI or detection of stenosis > 50% by sonography. In these cases, computed tomography angiography or digital subtraction angiography was performed. The following data were identified for each limb: the location of the lesion (common iliac artery (CIA), external iliac artery (EIA) or both), EIA stenosis or occlusion that involves the origins of the internal iliac and/or common femoral artery (CFA), TASC II lesion types and the status of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the profunda femoris (PF) (patent, > 50% stenosis or occluded) [1]. Demographic data, patients’ risk factors and all the independent predictors were statistically analysed and correlated with outcome. Iliac artery PTA and stent placement were considered technically successful if there was < 30% residual stenosis and the brachiofemoral pressure gradient was less than 5 mm Hg. Primary and assisted primary patency for stents and prostheses were defined according to Rutherford et al. [11]. Haemodynamic success and clinical improvement were defined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting standards [11].

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out with the software IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The quantitative data are presented as the mean and the standard deviation (SD) or as the mean standard error (SE). For testing the statistical hypothesis, the significance level of 0.05 was selected. For comparing the means of 2 groups, the independent samples t test was used. For testing the statistical hypothesis about the independence of 2 variables, the χ2 test was used. All the analyses were performed according to the principle of intention-to-treat. Primary patency and assisted primary patency were determined with the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the results between the stent and surgery groups.

Results

In total, 54 patients (62 limbs) underwent iliac artery stenting IAS implantations (87 stents) and 47 patients (54 limbs) underwent aortoiliac surgical reconstruction. The patients undergoing IAS had a mean age of 67.9 ±9.9 years, and the patients undergoing aortoiliac bypass were younger (63.2 ±9.5 years; p = 0.018). Other demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups (Table I).
Table I

Clinical characteristics of patient groups

VariableStent group (n = 54)Surgery group (n = 47)P-value
n (%)n (%)
Gender:
 Male49 (90.7)45 (95.7)0.323
 Female5 (9.3)2 (4.3)
Age [years]:
 Mean (SD)67.9 (9.9)63.2 (9.5)0.018
 < 7030 (55.6)34 (72.3)
 ≥ 7024 (44.4)13 (27.7)
Smoking:
 Smoke23 (42.6)27 (57.4)
 Do not smoke20 (37.0)10 (21.3)χ2 = 3.231; df = 2; p = 0.199
 Quit smoking11 (20.4)10 (21.3)
Hypertension:
 No20 (37.0)13 (27.7)0.316
 Yes34 (63.0)34 (72.3)
Diabetes:
 No52 (96.3)47 (100)0.497
 Yes2 (3.7)0
 COPD4 (7.4)3 (6.4)0.230
 Coronary artery disease34 (63)22 (46)0.247
 Chronic renal failure4 (7.4)2 (4.2)0.325
Symptoms:
 Claudication:33 (61.1)26 (55.3)
  Rutherford category 214 (25.9)14 (29.8)
  Rutherford category 319 (35.2)12 (25.5)
 Rest pain: Rutherford category 412 (22.2)14 (29.8)χ2 = 0.753, df = 2; p = 0.686
 Gangrene: Rutherford category 59 (16.7)7 (14.9)
Mean hospital stay, mean (SD) [days]1.0 (0.35)7.0 (1.0)< 0.001

COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Clinical characteristics of patient groups COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The mean follow-up in the stent group was 15.4 months (range: 0.1–24.0) and was evaluated as 1-year and up to 2-year results. The number of lesions in each category was as follows: 13 lesions of 3–5 cm, 45 lesions of 5–10 cm and 4 lesions of more than 10 cm. Primary stenting was performed in 41 (75.9%) patients. Elective stenting was performed for residual stenosis or pressure gradient after PTA in 9 (16.7%) patients or dissection after balloon angioplasty in 4 (7.4%) patients. Initial technical success was obtained in 62 procedures. Single stents were used in 40 (64.5%) lesions, 2 stents in 19 (30.6%) lesions and 3 stents in 3 (4.9%) lesions. Sixteen stents were placed in type B lesions (18.4%), 50 stents in type C lesions (57.5%) and 21 stents in type D lesions (24.1%) (Table II).
Table II

Limb-based distribution, characteristics and procedural factors of 62 stenting (62 limbs treated) and 47 surgical procedures (54 limbs treated) for TASC II type B, C and D lesions

VariableStent group(n = 62 limbs) n (%)Surgery group(n = 54 limbs) n (%)P-value
Iliac artery disease:
 Stenosis37 (59.7)16 (29.6)< 0.001
 Occlusion25 (40.3)38 (70.4)
EIA involvement:
 No19 (30.6)9 (16.7)0.079
 Yes43 (69.4)45 (83.3)
TASC II stratification of iliac artery lesions:
 B13 (21.0)*2 (3.7)*χ2 = 20.205, df = 2; p < 0.001;*,**,***p < 0.05
 C36 (58.0)**20 (37.0)**
 D13 (21.0)***32 (59.3)***
Runoff of ipsilateral SFA:
 Open27 (43.5)34 (63.0)χ2 = 5.228, df = 2; p = 0.073
 Stenosed (50–99%)7 (11.3)2 (3.7)
 Occluded28 (45.2)18 (33.3)
Runoff of ipsilateral PF:
 Open60 (96.8)51 (94.4)0.269
 Stenosed (50–99%)2 (3.2)3 (5.6)
 Occluded00

EIA – external iliac artery, PF – profunda femoris artery, SFA – superficial femoral artery.

Limb-based distribution, characteristics and procedural factors of 62 stenting (62 limbs treated) and 47 surgical procedures (54 limbs treated) for TASC II type B, C and D lesions EIA – external iliac artery, PF – profunda femoris artery, SFA – superficial femoral artery. The mean length of the stents was 59.6 ±19.9 mm (SE = 2.7) (range: 27.0–120 mm). Early stent thrombosis in ≤ 30 days was detected in 2 (3.7%) patients. Thrombectomies using a Fogarty catheter were unsuccessful, and unilateral iliofemoral bypass (IFB) was performed in both cases. After stent implantation, 14 additional concomitant surgical procedures were performed: 5 common femoral artery endarterectomies, 7 infrainguinal bypass procedures and 2 femoral profundoplasties due to EIA occlusion that involves the origins of the CFA and/or the PF. Most often surgical reconstruction procedures were performed to treat unilateral disease: 24 (44.4%) patients underwent IFB grafting and 16 (29.7%) patients underwent unilateral aortofemoral grafting. Seven aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) grafting procedures (25.9%) were performed to treat bilateral disease. Simultaneous CFA endarterectomy was necessary in 6 patients, and femoral profundoplasty was required in 3 patients. The clinical follow-up was available in 47 patients in the surgery group. The mean follow-up was 15.6 months (range: 3.0–24.0). The ABI significantly increased in both groups of patients. In the IAS group, the ABI increased following intervention from 0.34 ±0.08 to 0.81 ±0.14 (p < 0.001). In the surgery group, the ABI increased following the operation from 0.35 ±0.07 to 0.84 ±0.14 (p < 0.001). Improvement of subjective symptoms was also observed in all the patients of the stent and the surgery groups. Iliac occlusive disease was more extensive and multifocal in the surgery group, with more TASC II type D lesions; however, in the stent group, there were more TASC II type C lesions, with a prevalence of iliac artery stenosis (Table II). The cumulative primary stent patency at 1 and 2 years was 83.0 ±5.2% and 79.9 ±5.8%, respectively. The cumulative primary prosthesis patency at 1 and 2 years was 97.1 ±2.9% and 97.1 ±2.9%, respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier curve estimates for the primary patency rates in the patients treated by aortoiliac grafting and stenting

Kaplan-Meier curve estimates for the primary patency rates in the patients treated by aortoiliac grafting and stenting The primary patency did not vary significantly with respect to TASC II stratification and ranged from 84.6 ±1.0% (type B) to 76.9 ±1.2% (type D) at 24 months (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The limb-based Kaplan-Meier curve for the primary stent patency rates depending on the TASC II classification

The limb-based Kaplan-Meier curve for the primary stent patency rates depending on the TASC II classification During the follow-up, 5 patients died: 4 patients (after 4, 10, 12.5 and 12.5 months) due to myocardial infarction (MI) and 1 patient (after 13 months) following implantation due to colon carcinoma. Two (4.3%) patients died after 14 and 19 months due to MI in the surgery group; both patients were older than 70 years. In 3 (5.5%) patients, in-stent restenosis (> 50%) was detected at 9, 18 and 18 months: 1 in a TASC II C lesion and 2 in a TASC II D lesion. These stenoses were successfully corrected by PTA. The assisted primary stent patency at 1 and 2 years was 87.9 ±4.6% and 78.2 ±6.7%, respectively. The assisted primary patency rates of the surgery group at 1 and 2 years were 97.1 ±2.9% and 93.3 ±4.6%, respectively (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the assisted primary patency rates in the patients treated by aortoiliac grafting and stenting

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the assisted primary patency rates in the patients treated by aortoiliac grafting and stenting

Complications

There was no perioperative mortality in either of the groups.

Stent group

There were 4 (7.4%) stenting-related vascular complications, i.e. distal embolisations, which were corrected by embolectomy using a Fogarty catheter. These complications occurred in 3 of 41 (7.3%) patients in the TASC II C/D group and in 1 of 13 (7.7%) patients in the TASC II B group. The prevalence of complications was not significantly different between the TASC II C/D and TASC II B groups (p = 0.8). Progression of infrainguinal occlusive disease was the cause of an above-the-knee amputation 7 and 14 months after iliac stenting in 2 patients. No stent infection was detected during the follow-up.

Surgery group

Complications occurred in 3 (6.3%) patients. Postoperative complications presented as pneumonia in 1 (2.1%) patient, and wound complications presented as hematoma in 1 (2.1%) patient and inguinal lymphorrhoea in 1 (2.1%) patient. All the patients were treated conservatively. During the follow-up in the surgery group, we detected 1 above-the-knee amputation 23 months after unilateral IFB. No graft infection was observed during the follow-up.

Discussion

Iliac artery PTA and stent placement are nowadays considered as alternative therapeutic options to open surgery for patients suffering from symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease. In our study, the primary patency rates after IAS at 1 and 2 years were 83.0% and 79.9%, respectively. Our results are similar to those determined by Sixt et al. [5] and Kashyap et al. [14]: 86% and 82%, respectively. However, Soga et al. [7] reported the primary iliac stent patency at 1 and 3 years to be 92.5% and 82.6%, respectively. In the recent large-scale prospective multicenter trial BRAVISSIMO, the authors revealed the primary stent patency rates at 12 months to be 93.1% for the total patient population treated for TASC A, B, C and D aortoiliac lesions [15]. In our study, the primary patency was lower in the IAS group; however, assisted primary patency in the IAS group was better but also lower in comparison with the surgery group. Other authors have reported similar results [8, 16]. In the present study, the primary stent patency at 1 and 2 years was 76.9% for TASC II type D lesions. A number of researchers reveal 1-year primary stent patency rates to be from 85% to 93% and 5-year primary patency rates from 70% to 80.5% after stenting of TASC II type D lesions [5, 6, 7, 15, 17]. For both IAS and surgery groups, it is important to have adequate outflow. There were 14 patients in the IAS group and 9 patients in the surgery group who underwent reconstructions for concomitant infrainguinal disease. Timely intervention for the CFA and the SFA may have prevented stent or graft thrombosis [8, 18]. In our study, there were more unilateral surgical reconstructions compared with ABF (85.1% vs. 14.9%), and iliac occlusive disease was more extensive and multifocal in the surgery group, with more TASC II type D lesions (59.3% vs. 21.0%; p < 0.05). No early mortality and no graft infection were observed in the surgery group, but this may be due to the small number of the patients in the ABF group (7 patients). Chiu et al. [19] performed a meta-analysis of 29 studies in 5,378 patients after ABF bypass: more than half of the patients were operated on for claudication. The operative mortality was 4.1%, and major complications were present in 16% of the patients. The authors consider that there are no trials directly comparing outcomes after ABF and IFB. However, according to Zukauskas et al. [20], IFB is consistently reported as being less traumatic and requiring shorter exposure time when compared with ABF. The results of our study support this idea. During the follow-up, 4 patients died due to MI in the stent group. However, no periprocedural myocardial ischaemia or MI was detected. These patients would have had a higher risk of open surgery. According to Flu et al. [21], the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischaemia following abdominal aorta surgery ranged from 14% to 47% and that of perioperative MI ranged from 1% to 26% (detected with troponin I or T measurements). Thus, vascular surgery patients are at an increased risk of developing perioperative cardiac complications. The results of our study show that patients with comorbidities should be treated by stenting with priority. In our series, early iliac artery stent thrombosis (≤ 30 days) was observed in 2 (3.7%) patients. In both cases, the stent was placed in both iliac (CIA and EIA) arteries across the inguinal ligament and the patients had rest pain (category 4 according to the Rutherford classification). Ozkan et al. [6] reported early iliac artery stent thrombosis (≤ 30 days) in 8 of 118 (7%) patients. The authors concluded that it was more likely associated with critical limb ischaemia than with intermittent claudication (50% vs. 4%; p = 0.002). The incidence of intraprocedural complications in the IAS group of 9.3% is similar to the reported incidence of 10% to 12% [8, 22]. According to Pulli et al. [3], there were 9% of perioperative complications following IAS in the iliac artery occlusion group and 3.5% in the iliac artery stenosis group. The majority of the intraprocedural complications of IAS can be managed conservatively. Early mortality following iliac stent implantation has been reported in several studies and ranged from 0.7% to 3.6% [2, 4, 23]. In conclusion, our results reveal that patients with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (TASC II types B, C and D) can be treated with IAS or surgically with satisfactory results. The IAS is associated with decreased primary patency compared with the surgery group. The IAS should be considered with priority in elderly patients or in patients with severe comorbidities.
  23 in total

1.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).

Authors:  L Norgren; W R Hiatt; J A Dormandy; M R Nehler; K A Harris; F G R Fowkes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  The management of severe aortoiliac occlusive disease: endovascular therapy rivals open reconstruction.

Authors:  Vikram S Kashyap; Mircea L Pavkov; James F Bena; Timur P Sarac; Patrick J O'Hara; Sean P Lyden; Daniel G Clair
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version.

Authors:  R B Rutherford; J D Baker; C Ernst; K W Johnston; J M Porter; S Ahn; D N Jones
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Contemporary outcomes after endovascular treatment for aorto-iliac artery disease.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Soga; Osamu Iida; Daizo Kawasaki; Yasutaka Yamauchi; Kenji Suzuki; Keisuke Hirano; Ryoji Koshida; Daisuke Kamoi; Junichi Tazaki; Michiaki Higashitani; Yoshiaki Shintani; Terutoshi Yamaoka; Shinya Okazaki; Nobuhiro Suematsu; Taketsugu Tsuchiya; Yusuke Miyashita; Norihiko Shinozaki; Hiroki Takahashi
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 5.  Perioperative cardiac damage in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  W-J Flu; O Schouten; J-P van Kuijk; D Poldermans
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Early and long-term comparison of endovascular treatment of iliac artery occlusions and stenosis.

Authors:  Raffaele Pulli; Walter Dorigo; Aaron Fargion; Alessandro Alessi Innocenti; Giovanni Pratesi; John Marek; Carlo Pratesi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Review of direct anatomical open surgical management of atherosclerotic aorto-iliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  K W H Chiu; R S M Davies; P G Nightingale; A W Bradbury; D J Adam
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Results of iliac stenting and aortofemoral grafting for iliac artery occlusions.

Authors:  Gul R Sachwani; Sachinder S Hans; Michael D Khoury; Thomas F King; Mayo Mitsuya; Youssef S Rizk; Julie A Zachwieja; Luay Sayed
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Acute and long-term outcome of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac occlusive lesions stratified according to the TASC classification: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Sixt; Abdul Karim Alawied; Aljoscha Rastan; Uwe Schwarzwälder; Martin Kleim; Elias Noory; Thomas Schwarz; Ulrich Frank; Christian Müller; Michael Hauk; Ulrich Beschorner; Taher Nazary; Karlheinz Bürgelin; Kirsten Hauswald; Olli Leppänen; Franz-Josef Neumann; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Endovascular treatment of external iliac artery stenoses for claudication with systematic stenting.

Authors:  Blandine Maurel; Julien Lancelevee; David Jacobi; François Bleuet; Robert Martinez; Patrick Lermusiaux
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 1.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.