| Literature DB >> 27186167 |
Nathane França-Silva1, Natácia Dreyce Gonçalves Oliveira1, Ana Paula Coelho Balbi1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The renal development of rats begins in intrauterine life, finishing by 15 days after birth. Diabetes and other diseases during pregnancy can cause systemic changes in the offspring. We evaluated the structural and functional renal alterations of the offspring from diabetic mothers.Entities:
Keywords: maternal diabetes; offspring; postnatal renal development
Year: 2015 PMID: 27186167 PMCID: PMC4848350 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.48220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Figure 1Morphometric analysis of glomerular tuft area in the renal cortex of G1 (light gray bar), G2 (black bar) and G3 (dark gray bar) groups at 30 days old
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 (vs. control); &p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic).
Score for glomerular and tubulointerstitial α-SMA expression and number of PCNA+ cells per glomerulus
| Groups (age in days) | PCNA+ cells | Glomerular α-SMA | Tubulointerstitial α-SMA |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1: | |||
| 1 | 7.938 ±0.447 | 1.489 ±0.197 | 1.758 ±0.277 |
| 7 | 3.669 ±0.294 | 0.637 ±0.109 | 1.749 ±0.180 |
| 30 | 3.551 ±0.524+1 | 0.039 ±0.007+1
| 0.104 ±0.040+1
|
| G2: | |||
| 1 | 6.708 ±0.303 | 1.727 ±0.119 | 2.284 ±0.119 |
| 7 | 4.583 ±0.432 | 0.702 ±0.119 | 2.271 ±0.154 |
| 30 | 1.654 ±0.182 | 0.004 ±0.002 | 0.247 ±0.031** |
| G3: | |||
| c1 | 6.224 ±0.435 | 1.722 ±0.085 | 1.782 ±0.131 |
| 7 | 3.781 ±0.163 | 0.755 ±0.125 | 2.040 ±0.074 |
| 30 | 4.327 ±0.386 | 0.038 ±0.026 | 0.247 ±0.031 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
PCNA+: +1 p < 0.05 (vs. control at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic at 7 days old)
p < 0.05 (vs. control at the same age)
p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic)
glomerular and tubulointerstitial α-SMA: +1 p < 0.05 (vs. control at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. control at 7 days old)
p < 0.001 (vs. untreated diabetic at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic at 7 days old)
p < 0.01 (vs. treated diabetic at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. treated diabetic at 1 day old)
p < 0.05 (vs. treated diabetic at 7 days old)
tubulointerstitial α-SMA: *p < 0.05 (vs. control at the same age)
glomerular α-SMA: **p < 0.01 (vs. control at the same age).
Figure 2Immunostaining for PCNA in the renal cortex of G1 (control – A, D), G2 (untreated diabetic – B, E) and G3 (treated diabetic – C, F) groups at 7 (A–C) and 30 (D–F) days old. Note that there are more PCNA+ cells per glomerulus in the animals aged 7 days old than at 30 days old in G1, G2 and G3. Bar = 50 μm
Figure 3PCNA+ cells per glomerulus expression in the renal cortex of G1 (control – light gray bars), G2 (untreated diabetic – black bars) and G3 (treated diabetic – dark gray bars) groups at 1 (A), 7 (B) and 30 (C) days old. This graph compares different groups at the same age
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 (vs. control of same age); &p < 0.05 (vs. untreated diabetic).
Figure 4Immunostaining for α-SMA in the renal cortex of G1 (control – A, D), G2 (untreated diabetic – B, E) and G3 (treated diabetic – C, F) groups at 1 (A–C) and 7 (D–F) days old. Note that there is an increase in α-SMA expression in the tubulointerstitial compartment of animals from G2 at 1 and 7 days old, when compared to controls of the same age. Bar = 50 μm
Figure 5The α-SMA tubulointerstitial expression in the renal cortex of G1 (control – light gray bars), G2 (untreated diabetic – black bars) and G3 (treated diabetic – dark gray bars) groups at 1 (A), 7 (B) and 30 (C) days old. The graphs compare different groups of the same age
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 (vs. control at the same age).
Figure 6The α-SMA expression per glomerulus in the renal cortex of G1 (control – light gray bars), G2 (untreated diabetic – black bars) and G3 (treated diabetic – dark gray bars) groups at 1 (A), 7 (B) and 30 (C) days old. This graph compares different groups at the same age
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01 (vs. control at the same age).
Data from SBP and GFR
| Groups | SBP [mm Hg] | GFR [ml/min] |
|---|---|---|
| G1 | 130.7 ±5.448 | 0.912 ±0.058 |
| G2 | 142.7 ±5.592 | 0.422 ±0.113 |
| G3 | 120.0 ±2.637 | 0.865 ±0.163 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM
p < 0.01 (vs. control)
p < 0.01 (vs. untreated diabetic).
Figure 7The GFR determination by creatinine clearance of G1 (control – light gray bar), G2 (untreated diabetic – black bar) and G3 (treated diabetic – dark gray bar) groups at 30 days old
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01 (vs. control); &&p < 0.01 (vs. untreated diabetic).
Figure 8The SBP determination by plethysmography of G1 (control – light gray bar), G2 (untreated diabetic – black bar) and G3 (treated diabetic – dark gray bar) groups at 90 days old
*p < 0.05.