Literature DB >> 27185800

Mutations in pepQ Confer Low-Level Resistance to Bedaquiline and Clofazimine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Deepak Almeida1, Thomas Ioerger2, Sandeep Tyagi1, Si-Yang Li1, Khisimuzi Mdluli3, Koen Andries4, Jacques Grosset1, Jim Sacchettini5, Eric Nuermberger6.   

Abstract

The novel ATP synthase inhibitor bedaquiline recently received accelerated approval for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and is currently being studied as a component of novel treatment-shortening regimens for drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. In a limited number of bedaquiline-treated patients reported to date, ≥4-fold upward shifts in bedaquiline MIC during treatment have been attributed to non-target-based mutations in Rv0678 that putatively increase bedaquiline efflux through the MmpS5-MmpL5 pump. These mutations also confer low-level clofazimine resistance, presumably by a similar mechanism. Here, we describe a new non-target-based determinant of low-level bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: loss-of-function mutations in pepQ (Rv2535c), which corresponds to a putative Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase. pepQ mutants were selected in mice by treatment with clinically relevant doses of bedaquiline, with or without clofazimine, and were shown to have bedaquiline and clofazimine MICs 4 times higher than those for the parental H37Rv strain. Coincubation with efflux inhibitors verapamil and reserpine lowered bedaquiline MICs against both mutant and parent strains to a level below the MIC against H37Rv in the absence of efflux pump inhibitors. However, quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed no significant differences in expression of Rv0678, mmpS5, or mmpL5 between mutant and parent strains. Complementation of a pepQ mutant with the wild-type gene restored susceptibility, indicating that loss of PepQ function is sufficient for reduced susceptibility both in vitro and in mice. Although the mechanism by which mutations in pepQ confer bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistance remains unclear, these results may have clinical implications and warrant further evaluation of clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to either drug for mutations in this gene.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27185800      PMCID: PMC4958187          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00753-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  45 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server.

Authors:  Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Genetic characterization of pepP, which encodes an aminopeptidase P whose deficiency does not affect Lactococcus lactis growth in milk, unlike deficiency of the X-prolyl dipeptidyl aminopeptidase.

Authors:  J Matos; M Nardi; H Kumura; V Monnet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Infectious disease. Approval of novel TB drug celebrated--with restraint.

Authors:  Jon Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Sequence and structure comparison suggest that methionine aminopeptidase, prolidase, aminopeptidase P, and creatinase share a common fold.

Authors:  J F Bazan; L H Weaver; S L Roderick; R Huber; B W Matthews
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Processing of the initiation methionine from proteins: properties of the Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase and its gene structure.

Authors:  A Ben-Bassat; K Bauer; S Y Chang; K Myambo; A Boosman; S Chang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Structure and mechanism of a proline-specific aminopeptidase from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M C Wilce; C S Bond; N E Dixon; H C Freeman; J M Guss; P E Lilley; J A Wilce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Comparative genomics of mycobacterial proteases.

Authors:  Michelle Lopes Ribeiro-Guimarães; Maria Cristina Vidal Pessolani
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2007-06-02       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence.

Authors:  S T Cole; R Brosch; J Parkhill; T Garnier; C Churcher; D Harris; S V Gordon; K Eiglmeier; S Gas; C E Barry; F Tekaia; K Badcock; D Basham; D Brown; T Chillingworth; R Connor; R Davies; K Devlin; T Feltwell; S Gentles; N Hamlin; S Holroyd; T Hornsby; K Jagels; A Krogh; J McLean; S Moule; L Murphy; K Oliver; J Osborne; M A Quail; M A Rajandream; J Rogers; S Rutter; K Seeger; J Skelton; R Squares; S Squares; J E Sulston; K Taylor; S Whitehead; B G Barrell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The non-clonality of drug resistance in Beijing-genotype isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the Western Cape of South Africa.

Authors:  Thomas R Ioerger; Yicheng Feng; Xiaohua Chen; Karen M Dobos; Thomas C Victor; Elizabeth M Streicher; Robin M Warren; Nicolaas C Gey van Pittius; Paul D Van Helden; James C Sacchettini
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  58 in total

1.  In Vitro Drug Susceptibility of Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, Moxifloxacin, and Gatifloxacin against Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yu Pang; Zhaojing Zong; Fengmin Huo; Wei Jing; Yifeng Ma; Lingling Dong; Yunxu Li; Liping Zhao; Yuhong Fu; Hairong Huang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Systematic review of mutations associated with resistance to the new and repurposed Mycobacterium tuberculosis drugs bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid and pretomanid.

Authors:  Suha Kadura; Nicholas King; Maria Nakhoul; Hongya Zhu; Grant Theron; Claudio U Köser; Maha Farhat
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Emergence of mmpT5 Variants during Bedaquiline Treatment of Mycobacterium intracellulare Lung Disease.

Authors:  David C Alexander; Ravikiran Vasireddy; Sruthi Vasireddy; Julie V Philley; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Benjamin J Perry; David E Griffith; Jeana L Benwill; Andrew D S Cameron; Richard J Wallace
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Bedaquiline Inhibits the ATP Synthase in Mycobacterium abscessus and Is Effective in Infected Zebrafish.

Authors:  Christian Dupont; Albertus Viljoen; Sangeeta Thomas; Françoise Roquet-Banères; Jean-Louis Herrmann; Kevin Pethe; Laurent Kremer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mutations in fbiD (Rv2983) as a Novel Determinant of Resistance to Pretomanid and Delamanid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Dalin Rifat; Si-Yang Li; Thomas Ioerger; Keshav Shah; Jean-Philippe Lanoix; Jin Lee; Ghader Bashiri; James Sacchettini; Eric Nuermberger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In Vitro Activity of Bedaquiline against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in China.

Authors:  Yu Pang; Huiwen Zheng; Yaoju Tan; Yuanyuan Song; Yanlin Zhao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Characterization of Genomic Variants Associated with Resistance to Bedaquiline and Delamanid in Naive Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Strains.

Authors:  S Battaglia; A Spitaleri; A M Cabibbe; C J Meehan; C Utpatel; N Ismail; S Tahseen; A Skrahina; N Alikhanova; S M Mostofa Kamal; A Barbova; S Niemann; R Groenheit; A S Dean; M Zignol; L Rigouts; D M Cirillo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Verapamil Increases the Bioavailability and Efficacy of Bedaquiline but Not Clofazimine in a Murine Model of Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Rokeya Tasneen; Charles A Peloquin; Deepak V Almeida; Si-Yang Li; Kala Barnes-Boyle; Yu Lu; Eric Nuermberger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  A Multilaboratory, Multicountry Study To Determine Bedaquiline MIC Quality Control Ranges for Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Koné Kaniga; Daniela M Cirillo; Sven Hoffner; Nazir A Ismail; Devinder Kaur; Nacer Lounis; Beverly Metchock; Gaby E Pfyffer; Amour Venter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Preserved Efficacy and Reduced Toxicity with Intermittent Linezolid Dosing in Combination with Bedaquiline and Pretomanid in a Murine Tuberculosis Model.

Authors:  Kristina M Bigelow; Rokeya Tasneen; Yong S Chang; Kelly E Dooley; Eric L Nuermberger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.