Francois R Lamy1, Raminta Daniulaityte2, Amit Sheth3, Ramzi W Nahhas4, Silvia S Martins5, Edward W Boyer6, Robert G Carlson2. 1. Center for Interventions, Treatment, and Addictions Research (CITAR), Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 3171 Research Blvd., Suite 124, Dayton, OH 45420-4006, United States; Ohio Center of Excellence in Knowledge-enabled Computing (Kno.e.sis), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States. Electronic address: francois.lamy@wright.edu. 2. Center for Interventions, Treatment, and Addictions Research (CITAR), Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 3171 Research Blvd., Suite 124, Dayton, OH 45420-4006, United States. 3. Ohio Center of Excellence in Knowledge-enabled Computing (Kno.e.sis), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, United States. 4. Center for Global Health, Department of Community Health, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Abstract
AIMS: Several states in the U.S. have legalized cannabis for recreational or medical uses. In this context, cannabis edibles have drawn considerable attention after adverse effects were reported. This paper investigates Twitter users' perceptions concerning edibles and evaluates the association edibles-related tweeting activity and local cannabis legislation. METHODS: Tweets were collected between May 1 and July 31, 2015, using Twitter API and filtered through the eDrugTrends/Twitris platform. A random sample of geolocated tweets was manually coded to evaluate Twitter users' perceptions regarding edibles. Raw state proportions of Twitter users mentioning edibles were ajusted relative to the total number of Twitter users per state. Differences in adjusted proportions of Twitter users mentioning edibles between states with different cannabis legislation status were assesed via a permutation test. RESULTS: We collected 100,182 tweets mentioning cannabis edibles with 26.9% (n=26,975) containing state-level geolocation. Adjusted percentages of geolocated Twitter users posting about edibles were significantly greater in states that allow recreational and/or medical use of cannabis. The differences were statistically significant. Overall, cannabis edibles were generally positively perceived among Twitter users despite some negative tweets expressing the unreliability of edible consumption linked to variability in effect intensity and duration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Twitter data analysis is an important tool for epidemiological monitoring of emerging drug use practices and trends. Results tend to indicate greater tweeting activity about cannabis edibles in states where medical THC and/or recreational use are legal. Although the majority of tweets conveyed positive attitudes about cannabis edibles, analysis of experiences expressed in negative tweets confirms the potential adverse effects of edibles and calls for educating edibles-naïve users, improving edibles labeling, and testing their THC content.
AIMS: Several states in the U.S. have legalized cannabis for recreational or medical uses. In this context, cannabis edibles have drawn considerable attention after adverse effects were reported. This paper investigates Twitter users' perceptions concerning edibles and evaluates the association edibles-related tweeting activity and local cannabis legislation. METHODS:Tweets were collected between May 1 and July 31, 2015, using Twitter API and filtered through the eDrugTrends/Twitris platform. A random sample of geolocated tweets was manually coded to evaluate Twitter users' perceptions regarding edibles. Raw state proportions of Twitter users mentioning edibles were ajusted relative to the total number of Twitter users per state. Differences in adjusted proportions of Twitter users mentioning edibles between states with different cannabis legislation status were assesed via a permutation test. RESULTS: We collected 100,182 tweets mentioning cannabis edibles with 26.9% (n=26,975) containing state-level geolocation. Adjusted percentages of geolocated Twitter users posting about edibles were significantly greater in states that allow recreational and/or medical use of cannabis. The differences were statistically significant. Overall, cannabis edibles were generally positively perceived among Twitter users despite some negative tweets expressing the unreliability of edible consumption linked to variability in effect intensity and duration. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Twitter data analysis is an important tool for epidemiological monitoring of emerging drug use practices and trends. Results tend to indicate greater tweeting activity about cannabis edibles in states where medical THC and/or recreational use are legal. Although the majority of tweets conveyed positive attitudes about cannabis edibles, analysis of experiences expressed in negative tweets confirms the potential adverse effects of edibles and calls for educating edibles-naïve users, improving edibles labeling, and testing their THC content.
Authors: Stephen F Butler; Synne Wing Venuti; Christine Benoit; Richard L Beaulaurier; Brian Houle; Nathaniel Katz Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Jared Jashinsky; Scott H Burton; Carl L Hanson; Josh West; Christophe Giraud-Carrier; Michael D Barnes; Trenton Argyle Journal: Crisis Date: 2014
Authors: Ryan Vandrey; Jeffrey C Raber; Mark E Raber; Brad Douglass; Cameron Miller; Marcel O Bonn-Miller Journal: JAMA Date: 2015 Jun 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tista S Ghosh; Michael Van Dyke; Ali Maffey; Elizabeth Whitley; Dana Erpelding; Larry Wolk Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Raminta Daniulaityte; Ramzi W Nahhas; Sanjaya Wijeratne; Robert G Carlson; Francois R Lamy; Silvia S Martins; Edward W Boyer; G Alan Smith; Amit Sheth Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-08-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne Journal: Science Date: 2009-02-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Evan S Herrmann; John M Mitchell; Ronald Flegel; Charles LoDico; George E Bigelow; Ryan Vandrey Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Francois R Lamy; Raminta Daniulaityte; Mussah Zatreh; Ramzi W Nahhas; Amit Sheth; Silvia S Martins; Edward W Boyer; Robert G Carlson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Raminta Daniulaityte; Francois R Lamy; Monica Barratt; Ramzi W Nahhas; Silvia S Martins; Edward W Boyer; Amit Sheth; Robert G Carlson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Elizabeth J D'Amico; Anthony Rodriguez; Michael S Dunbar; Caislin L Firth; Joan S Tucker; Rachana Seelam; Eric R Pedersen; Jordan P Davis Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-10-07
Authors: Francois R Lamy; Raminta Daniulaityte; Ramzi W Nahhas; Monica J Barratt; Alan G Smith; Amit Sheth; Silvia S Martins; Edward W Boyer; Robert G Carlson Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2017-06-01
Authors: Raminta Daniulaityte; Francois R Lamy; G Alan Smith; Ramzi W Nahhas; Robert G Carlson; Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan; Silvia S Martins; Edward W Boyer; Amit Sheth Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: George Sam Wang; Katelyn Hall; Daniel Vigil; Shireen Banerji; Andrew Monte; Mike VanDyke Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 4.018