Literature DB >> 27185088

Analyzing finger interdependencies during the Purdue Pegboard Test and comparative activities of daily living.

Victor Gonzalez1, Jennifer Rowson2, Alaster Yoxall3.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Bench and cross-sectional study.
INTRODUCTION: Information obtained from dexterity tests is an important component of a comprehensive examination of the hand. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To analyze and compare finger interdependencies during the performance of the Purdue Pegboard Test (PBT) and comparative daily tasks.
METHODS: A method based on the optoelectronic kinematic analysis of the precision grip style and on the calculation of cross-correlation coefficients between relevant joint angles, which provided measures of the degree of finger coordination, was conducted on 10 healthy participants performing the PBT and 2 comparative daily living tasks.
RESULTS: Daily tasks showed identifiable interdependencies patterns between the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers involved in the grip. Tasks related to activities of daily living resulted in significantly higher cross-correlation coefficients across subjects and movements during the formation and manipulation phases of the tasks (0.7-0.9), whereas the release stage produced significantly lower movement correlation values (0.3-0.7). Contrarily, the formation and manipulation stages of the PBT showed low finger correlation across most subjects (0.2-0.6), whereas the release stage resulted in the highest values for all relevant movements (0.65-0.9). DISCUSSION: Interdependencies patterns were consistent for the activities of daily living but differ from the patterns observed from the PBT.
CONCLUSIONS: The PBT does not compare well with the whole range of finger movements that account for hand performance during daily tasks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.
Copyright © 2016 Hanley & Belfus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dexterity; Finger coordination; Functional outcome; Hand function

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27185088     DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Ther        ISSN: 0894-1130            Impact factor:   1.950


  2 in total

1.  Evaluating Hand Function in Clients with Trigger Finger.

Authors:  Danit Langer; Adina Maeir; Michael Michailevich; Shai Luria
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.448

2.  Active versus resting neuro-navigated robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping.

Authors:  Cynthia K Kahl; Adrianna Giuffre; James G Wrightson; Adam Kirton; Elizabeth G Condliffe; Frank P MacMaster; Ephrem Zewdie
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.