Ignacio Ricci-Cabello1, Anthony J Avery2, David Reeves3, Umesh T Kadam4, Jose M Valderas5. 1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2. Division of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 3. Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. 4. Arthritis Primary Care Research Centre, Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom Health Services Research Unit, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom. 5. Health Services & Policy Research Group, Patient Centred Care, University of Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom J.M.Valderas@exeter.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We set out to develop and validate a patient-reported instrument for measuring experiences and outcomes related to patient safety in primary care. METHOD: The instrument was developed in a multistage process supported by an international expert panel and informed by a systematic review of instruments, a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, 4 patient focus groups, 18 cognitive interviews, and a pilot study. The trial version of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) covered 5 domains and 11 scales: practice activation (1 scale); patient activation (1 scale); experiences of patient safety events (1 scale); harm (6 scales); and general perceptions of patient safety (2 scales). The questionnaire was posted to 6,736 patients in 45 practices across England. We used "gold standard" psychometric methods to evaluate its acceptability, reliability, structural and construct validity, and ability to discriminate among practices. RESULTS: 1,244 completed questionnaires (18.5%) were returned. Median item-specific response rate was 91.3% (interquartile range 28.0%). No major ceiling or floor effects were observed. All 6 multi-item scales showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.75-0.96). Factor analysis, correlation between scales, and known group analyses generally supported structural and construct validity. The scales demonstrated a heterogeneous ability to discriminate between practices. The final version of PREOS-PC consisted of 5 domains, 8 scales, and 58 items. CONCLUSIONS: PREOS-PC is a new multi-dimensional patient safety instrument for primary care developed with experts and patients. Initial testing shows its potential for use in primary care, and future developments will further address its use in actual clinical practice.
PURPOSE: We set out to develop and validate a patient-reported instrument for measuring experiences and outcomes related to patient safety in primary care. METHOD: The instrument was developed in a multistage process supported by an international expert panel and informed by a systematic review of instruments, a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, 4 patient focus groups, 18 cognitive interviews, and a pilot study. The trial version of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) covered 5 domains and 11 scales: practice activation (1 scale); patient activation (1 scale); experiences of patient safety events (1 scale); harm (6 scales); and general perceptions of patient safety (2 scales). The questionnaire was posted to 6,736 patients in 45 practices across England. We used "gold standard" psychometric methods to evaluate its acceptability, reliability, structural and construct validity, and ability to discriminate among practices. RESULTS: 1,244 completed questionnaires (18.5%) were returned. Median item-specific response rate was 91.3% (interquartile range 28.0%). No major ceiling or floor effects were observed. All 6 multi-item scales showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.75-0.96). Factor analysis, correlation between scales, and known group analyses generally supported structural and construct validity. The scales demonstrated a heterogeneous ability to discriminate between practices. The final version of PREOS-PC consisted of 5 domains, 8 scales, and 58 items. CONCLUSIONS: PREOS-PC is a new multi-dimensional patient safety instrument for primary care developed with experts and patients. Initial testing shows its potential for use in primary care, and future developments will further address its use in actual clinical practice.
Authors: Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Osnat Levtzion-Korach; Allan Frankel; Hanna Alcalai; Carol Keohane; John Orav; Erin Graydon-Baker; Janet Barnes; Kathleen Gordon; Anne Louise Puopulo; Elena Ivanova Tomov; Luke Sato; David W Bates Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2010-09
Authors: Oyvind Bjertnaes; Ellen Tveter Deilkås; Kjersti Eeg Skudal; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Anne Mette Bjerkan Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Rebecca Lawton; Jane Kathryn O'Hara; Laura Sheard; Caroline Reynolds; Kim Cocks; Gerry Armitage; John Wright Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Kate S Marsden; Anthony J Avery; Brian G Bell; Umesh T Kadam; David Reeves; Sarah P Slight; Katherine Perryman; Jane Barnett; Ian Litchfield; Sally Thomas; Stephen M Campbell; Lucy Doos; Aneez Esmail; Jose M Valderas Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Susan J Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Carolyn Gamble; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Stephen M Campbell; Brian G Bell; Kate Marsden; Rachel Spencer; Umesh Kadam; Katherine Perryman; Sarah Rodgers; Ian Litchfield; David Reeves; Antony Chuter; Lucy Doos; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Paramjit Gill; Aneez Esmail; Sheila Greenfield; Sarah Slight; Karen Middleton; Jane Barnett; Michael Moore; Jose M Valderas; Aziz Sheikh; Anthony J Avery Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.243
Authors: Susan Jill Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Carolyn Gamble; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 2.692