Literature DB >> 27184996

Measuring Patient Safety in Primary Care: The Development and Validation of the "Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care" (PREOS-PC).

Ignacio Ricci-Cabello1, Anthony J Avery2, David Reeves3, Umesh T Kadam4, Jose M Valderas5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We set out to develop and validate a patient-reported instrument for measuring experiences and outcomes related to patient safety in primary care.
METHOD: The instrument was developed in a multistage process supported by an international expert panel and informed by a systematic review of instruments, a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, 4 patient focus groups, 18 cognitive interviews, and a pilot study. The trial version of Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) covered 5 domains and 11 scales: practice activation (1 scale); patient activation (1 scale); experiences of patient safety events (1 scale); harm (6 scales); and general perceptions of patient safety (2 scales). The questionnaire was posted to 6,736 patients in 45 practices across England. We used "gold standard" psychometric methods to evaluate its acceptability, reliability, structural and construct validity, and ability to discriminate among practices.
RESULTS: 1,244 completed questionnaires (18.5%) were returned. Median item-specific response rate was 91.3% (interquartile range 28.0%). No major ceiling or floor effects were observed. All 6 multi-item scales showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.75-0.96). Factor analysis, correlation between scales, and known group analyses generally supported structural and construct validity. The scales demonstrated a heterogeneous ability to discriminate between practices. The final version of PREOS-PC consisted of 5 domains, 8 scales, and 58 items.
CONCLUSIONS: PREOS-PC is a new multi-dimensional patient safety instrument for primary care developed with experts and patients. Initial testing shows its potential for use in primary care, and future developments will further address its use in actual clinical practice.
© 2016 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care evaluation mechanisms; health care surveys; patient safety; patient-centered care; primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27184996      PMCID: PMC4868564          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  20 in total

1.  Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments.

Authors:  Alan Tennant; Stephen P McKenna; Peter Hagell
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  What can hospitalized patients tell us about adverse events? Learning from patient-reported incidents.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Odelya Pagovich; Daniel Z Sands; Joseph M Li; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; David W Bates; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: making sense of the elephant.

Authors:  Osnat Levtzion-Korach; Allan Frankel; Hanna Alcalai; Carol Keohane; John Orav; Erin Graydon-Baker; Janet Barnes; Kathleen Gordon; Anne Louise Puopulo; Elena Ivanova Tomov; Luke Sato; David W Bates
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2010-09

4.  The wisdom of patients and families: ignore it at our peril.

Authors:  Liam J Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 5.  Time to listen: a review of methods to solicit patient reports of adverse events.

Authors:  A King; J Daniels; J Lim; D D Cochrane; A Taylor; J M Ansermino
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04

6.  The association between patient-reported incidents in hospitals and estimated rates of patient harm.

Authors:  Oyvind Bjertnaes; Ellen Tveter Deilkås; Kjersti Eeg Skudal; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Anne Mette Bjerkan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Can staff and patient perspectives on hospital safety predict harm-free care? An analysis of staff and patient survey data and routinely collected outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca Lawton; Jane Kathryn O'Hara; Laura Sheard; Caroline Reynolds; Kim Cocks; Gerry Armitage; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 8.  Tools for primary care patient safety: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rachel Spencer; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Measuring experiences and outcomes of patient safety in primary care: a systematic review of available instruments.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Daniela C Gonçalves; Antonio Rojas-García; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 10.  Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy.

Authors:  Tom W Reader; Alex Gillespie; Jane Roberts
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  18 in total

1.  Patients' evaluations of patient safety in English general practices: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Kate S Marsden; Anthony J Avery; Brian G Bell; Umesh T Kadam; David Reeves; Sarah P Slight; Katherine Perryman; Jane Barnett; Ian Litchfield; Sally Thomas; Stephen M Campbell; Lucy Doos; Aneez Esmail; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Patient feedback and evaluation measures of a physical activity initiative: Exercise is Medicine program.

Authors:  Kimberly R De Guzman; Michael Pratt; Andrea Hwang; Sarah E Linke
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Patient-reported safety incidents in older patients with long-term conditions: a large cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maria Panagioti; Thomas Blakeman; Mark Hann; Peter Bower
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Development and piloting of a survey to estimate the frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from a UK patient's perspective.

Authors:  Susan J Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Carolyn Gamble; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Influences on the adoption of patient safety innovation in primary care: a qualitative exploration of staff perspectives.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Paramjit Gill; Tony Avery; Stephen Campbell; Katherine Perryman; Kate Marsden; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Identifying patient-centred recommendations for improving patient safety in General Practices in England: a qualitative content analysis of free-text responses using the Patient Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care (PREOS-PC) questionnaire.

Authors:  Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Lorena Saletti-Cuesta; Sarah P Slight; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  A Patient Safety Toolkit for Family Practices.

Authors:  Stephen M Campbell; Brian G Bell; Kate Marsden; Rachel Spencer; Umesh Kadam; Katherine Perryman; Sarah Rodgers; Ian Litchfield; David Reeves; Antony Chuter; Lucy Doos; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Paramjit Gill; Aneez Esmail; Sheila Greenfield; Sarah Slight; Karen Middleton; Jane Barnett; Michael Moore; Jose M Valderas; Aziz Sheikh; Anthony J Avery
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.243

8.  Development and preliminary validation of the competency model for rural general practitioner in China.

Authors:  Yun Wei; Yanli Liu; Xuexue Zhao; Guanghui Jin; Yali Zhao; Xiaoqin Lu
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.

Authors:  Susan Jill Stocks; Ailsa Donnelly; Aneez Esmail; Joanne Beresford; Sarah Luty; Richard Deacon; Avril Danczak; Nicola Mann; David Townsend; James Ashley; Carolyn Gamble; Paul Bowie; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Validation of the Primary Care Patient Measure of Safety (PC PMOS) questionnaire.

Authors:  Sally J Giles; Sahdia Parveen; Andrea L Hernan
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.