Literature DB >> 27184382

How do I interpret a confidence interval?

Sheila F O'Brien1,2, Qi Long Yi1.   

Abstract

A 95% confidence interval (CI) of the mean is a range with an upper and lower number calculated from a sample. Because the true population mean is unknown, this range describes possible values that the mean could be. If multiple samples were drawn from the same population and a 95% CI calculated for each sample, we would expect the population mean to be found within 95% of these CIs. CIs are sensitive to variability in the population (spread of values) and sample size. When used to compare the means of two or more treatment groups, a CI shows the magnitude of a difference between groups. This is helpful in understanding both the statistical significance and the clinical significance of a treatment. In this article we describe the basic principles of CIs and their interpretation.
© 2016 AABB.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27184382     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  8 in total

1.  Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials.

Authors:  Ana Paula Coelho Figueira Freire; Mark R Elkins; Ercy Mara Cipulo Ramos; Anne M Moseley
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Effect of the photobiomodulation for acceleration of the orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oralia Lucero Olmedo-Hernández; Alejandra Nathaly Mota-Rodríguez; Rafael Torres-Rosas; Liliana Argueta-Figueroa
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Measuring Gait Parameters from Structural Vibrations.

Authors:  Benjamin T Davis; Brianna I Bryant; Stacy L Fritz; Reed Handlery; Alicia Flach; Victor A Hirth
Journal:  Measurement (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.131

4.  Can patients be trained to expect shared decision making in clinical consultations? Feasibility study of a public library program to raise patient awareness.

Authors:  Evehouenou Lionel Adisso; Valérie Borde; Marie-Ève Saint-Hilaire; Hubert Robitaille; Patrick Archambault; Johanne Blais; Cynthia Cameron; Michel Cauchon; Richard Fleet; Jean-Simon Létourneau; Michel Labrecque; Julien Quinty; Isabelle Samson; Alexandrine Boucher; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; France Légaré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Independent or simultaneous lowering of core and skin temperature has no impact on self-paced intermittent running performance in hot conditions.

Authors:  G Thomas; T Cullen; M Davies; C Hetherton; B Duncan; N Gerrett
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Improved up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity measurement with reliable LD50 verified by typical toxic alkaloids and modified Karber method.

Authors:  Yan-Yu Zhang; Yu-Feng Huang; Jie Liang; Hua Zhou
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Reply.

Authors:  Yahui Liu; Chuanyu Gao
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Tumor Size Measurements for Predicting Hodgkin's and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Response to Treatment.

Authors:  Maria Kallergi; Alexandros Georgakopoulos; Vassiliki Lyra; Sofia Chatziioannou
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-03-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.