Literature DB >> 27184056

Value-modulated oculomotor capture by task-irrelevant stimuli is a consequence of early competition on the saccade map.

Daniel Pearson1, Raphaella Osborn2, Thomas J Whitford2, Michel Failing3, Jan Theeuwes3, Mike E Le Pelley2.   

Abstract

Recent research has shown that reward learning can modulate oculomotor and attentional capture by physically salient and task-irrelevant distractor stimuli, even when directing gaze to those stimuli is directly counterproductive to receiving reward. This value-modulated oculomotor capture effect may reflect biased competition in the oculomotor system, such that the relationship between a stimulus feature and reward enhances that feature's representation on an internal priority map. However, it is also possible that this effect is a result of reward reducing the threshold for a saccade to be made to salient items. Here, we demonstrate value-modulated oculomotor capture when two reward-associated distractor stimuli are presented simultaneously in the same search display. The influence of reward on oculomotor capture is found to be most prominent at the shortest saccade latencies. We conclude that the value-modulated oculomotor capture effect is a consequence of biased competition on the saccade priority map and cannot be explained by a general reduction in saccadic threshold.

Keywords:  Attention in learning; Attentional capture; Eye movements and visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27184056     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1135-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  12 in total

1.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Yenti Pavri; Jenny Le; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  Don't let it distract you: how information about the availability of reward affects attentional selection.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Reduced attentional capture by reward following an acute dose of alcohol.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Mapping sign-tracking and goal-tracking onto human behaviors.

Authors:  Janna M Colaizzi; Shelly B Flagel; Michelle A Joyner; Ashley N Gearhardt; Jennifer L Stewart; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Selection History-Driven Signal Suppression.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-02-17

8.  Attentional avoidance of threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 9.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

10.  Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Daniel Pearson; Steven B Most; Jan Theeuwes; Reinout W Wiers; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.