Literature DB >> 27183362

Surgical Workflow Analysis: Ideal Application of Navigated Linear Array Ultrasound in Low-Grade Glioma Surgery.

Thomas Ernst Lothes1, Max Siekmann1, Ralph Werner König1, Christian Rainer Wirtz1, Jan Coburger1.   

Abstract

Background Intraoperative imaging in low-grade glioma (LGG) surgery can facilitate residual tumor control and improve surgical outcome. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ideal application and typical interactions of intraoperative MRI (iMRI), conventional low-frequency intraoperative ultrasound (cioUS), and high-frequency linear array intraoperative ultrasound (lioUS) to optimize surgical workflow. Methods Prospectively, we included 11 patients with an LGG. Typical procedural workflow in the iMRI suite was recorded with a compatible software. We took notes of duration, frequency of application, the surgeon's evaluation of image quality, and the respective benefit of lioUS (15 MHz), cioUS (7 MHz), and iMRI (1.5 T). With the help of the workflow software, we meticulously analyzed ∼ 55 hours of surgery. Results During the interventions, lioUS was used more often (76.3%) than cioUS (23.7%) and showed a better mean image quality (1 = best to 6 = worst) of 2.08 versus 3.26 with cioUS. The benefit of the lioUS application was rated with an average of 2.27, whereas the cioUS probe only reached a mean value of 3.83. The most common application of lioUS was resection control (42.6%); cioUS was used mainly for orientation (63.2%). Overall, lioUS was used more often and was rated better for both the purposes just described regarding image quality and benefit. Estimated residual tumor based on lioUS alone was lower than the final residual tumor detected with iMRI (7.5% versus 14.5%). The latter technique was rated as the best imaging modality for resection control in all cases followed by lioUS. Conclusion We provide proof of principle for workflow assessment in cranial neurosurgery. Although iMRI remains the imaging method of choice, lioUS has shown to be beneficial in a combined setup. Evaluation of lioUS was significantly superior to cioUS in most indications except for subcortical lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27183362     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg        ISSN: 2193-6315            Impact factor:   1.268


  4 in total

Review 1.  New Hope in Brain Glioma Surgery: The Role of Intraoperative Ultrasound. A Review.

Authors:  Maria Angela Pino; Alessia Imperato; Irene Musca; Rosario Maugeri; Giuseppe Roberto Giammalva; Gabriele Costantino; Francesca Graziano; Francesco Meli; Natale Francaviglia; Domenico Gerardo Iacopino; Alessandro Villa
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-11-19

2.  Advantages of Using 3D Intraoperative Ultrasound and Intraoperative MRI in Glioma Surgery.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Hou; Jie Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Full-course resection control strategy in glioma surgery using both intraoperative ultrasound and intraoperative MRI.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Hou; Ye Li; Qiongge Li; Yang Yu; Jie Tang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Evaluation of a Navigated 3D Ultrasound Integration for Brain Tumor Surgery: First Results of an Ongoing Prospective Study.

Authors:  Danilo Aleo; Ziad Elshaer; Andreas Pfnür; Patrick J Schuler; Marco Maria Fontanella; Christian Rainer Wirtz; Andrej Pala; Jan Coburger
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.109

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.