Literature DB >> 27183084

Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.

Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, Jaime Sardá Aramburú Júnior, Berenice Anina Dedavid, Jamil Awad Shibli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the resistance to static fatigue of implants with different connections before and after implantoplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty conical implants and 60 abutments were used; 4-mm-diameter versions were available for each model. Three groups (n = 20) were established based on the following implant connections: external hexagon (group 1), internal hexagon (group 2), and Morse taper (group 3). The implants of each group were submitted to a compressive load before (n = 10) and after the implantoplasty (n = 10). The wear was performed in a mechanical lathe machine using a carbide bur, and the final dimensions of each sample were measured. All groups were subjected to quasi-static loading at a 30-degree angle to the implant axis in a universal testing machine and 5 mm out of the implant support.
RESULTS: After the implantoplasty, the mean final diameter was 3.13 ± 0.033 mm for group 1, 3.23 ± 0.023 mm for group 2, and 3.25 ± 0.03 mm for group 3. The mean fracture strengths for the groups before and after the implantoplasty were, respectively, 773.1 ± 13.16 N and 487.1 ± 93.72 N in group 1; 829.4 ± 14.12 N and 495.7 ± 85.24 N in group 2; and 898.1 ± 19.25 N and 717.6 ± 77.25 N in group 3.
CONCLUSION: Resistance to loading decreased significantly after implantoplasty, and varied among the three implant connection designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27183084     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  3 in total

1.  A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal.

Authors:  Romy Angeles Maslucan; John Alexis Dominguez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Implantoplasty Improves Clinical Parameters over a 2-Year Follow-Up: A Case Series.

Authors:  Orlando Martins; Philipp Sahrmann; João Ramos; Francisco Caramelo; Sérgio Matos; Isabel Poiares Baptista
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.