Literature DB >> 27182960

The predictive value of the borderline ankle-brachial index for long-term clinical outcomes: An observational cohort study.

Shingo Tanaka1, Hidehiro Kaneko2, Hiroto Kano2, Shunsuke Matsuno2, Shinya Suzuki2, Hideaki Takai3, Takayuki Otsuka2, Tokuhisa Uejima2, Yuji Oikawa2, Kazuyuki Nagashima2, Hajime Kirigaya2, Koichi Sagara2, Junji Yajima2, Hitoshi Sawada2, Tadanori Aizawa2, Takeshi Yamashita2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low ankle-brachial index (ABI) is associated with increased mortality and an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of borderline ABI in predicting clinical outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The data were derived from the Shinken Database 2004-2012, from a single hospital-based cohort study (N = 19,994). ABI was measured in 5205 subjects; 4756 subjects whose ABI was 0.91-1.39 and having no history of peripheral artery disease were enrolled. The subjects were classified into two groups as follows: borderline ABI (0.91-1.00; n = 324) and normal ABI (1.01-1.39; n = 4432). Subjects in the borderline ABI group had more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, aortic disease, and stroke. Moreover, the borderline ABI group was associated with higher levels of hemoglobin A1c and brain natriuretic peptide, larger diameters of left atrium and left ventricle, and lower levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate and left ventricular ejection fraction. All-cause death and cardiovascular death occurred in 9.3% and 4.6% of subjects in the borderline ABI group, and in 2.0% and 0.8% of subjects in the normal ABI group, respectively. An adjusted Cox regression model showed that borderline ABI was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.27, p = 0.005) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.47, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: A borderline ABI was independently associated with worse clinical outcomes in relatively high risk population. Our data should be confirmed in larger populations including those with low risk profiles.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle-brachial index; Borderline; Peripheral arterial disease; Prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27182960     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  12 in total

1.  Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report from the Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Disease Asia-Pacific Peripheral Artery Disease Consensus Statement Project Committee.

Authors:  Maria Teresa B Abola; Jonathan Golledge; Tetsuro Miyata; Seung-Woon Rha; Bryan P Yan; Timothy C Dy; Marie Simonette V Ganzon; Pankaj Kumar Handa; Salim Harris; Jiang Zhisheng; Ramakrishna Pinjala; Peter Ashley Robless; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Elaine B Alajar; April Ann Bermudez-Delos Santos; Elmer Jasper B Llanes; Gay Marjorie Obrado-Nabablit; Noemi S Pestaño; Felix Eduardo Punzalan; Bernadette Tumanan-Mendoza
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.928

2.  The Cardiovascular-Mortality-Based Estimate for Normal Range of the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI).

Authors:  Essi Peltonen; Mirjami Laivuori; Damir Vakhitov; Päivi Korhonen; Maarit Venermo; Harri Hakovirta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Impressive predictive value of ankle-brachial index for very long-term outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: IMPACT-ABI study.

Authors:  Takashi Miura; Masatoshi Minamisawa; Yasushi Ueki; Naoyuki Abe; Hitoshi Nishimura; Naoto Hashizume; Tomoaki Mochidome; Mikiko Harada; Yasutaka Oguchi; Koji Yoshie; Wataru Shoin; Tatsuya Saigusa; Soichiro Ebisawa; Hirohiko Motoki; Jun Koyama; Uichi Ikeda; Koichiro Kuwahara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Color Doppler Ultrasonography Is a Useful Tool for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Ankle-Brachial Index 0.91 to 1.40.

Authors:  Kyu Yeon Hur; Ji Eun Jun; Young Ju Choi; Yong Ho Lee; Dae Jung Kim; Seok Won Park; Byung Wook Huh; Eun Jig Lee; Sun Ha Jee; Kap Bum Huh; Sung Hee Choi
Journal:  Diabetes Metab J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.376

5.  Pitfalls in the ankle-brachial index and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.

Authors:  Dai Ato
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 6.  Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, cardio-ankle vascular index, and prognosis.

Authors:  Dai Ato
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2018-10-24

7.  Low, borderline and normal ankle-brachial index as a predictor of incidents outcomes in the Mediterranean based-population ARTPER cohort after 9 years follow-up.

Authors:  M Teresa Alzamora; Rosa Forés; Guillem Pera; José Miguel Baena-Díez; Marta Valverde; Pere Torán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Use of the ankle-brachial index combined with the percentage of mean arterial pressure at the ankle to improve prediction of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an observational study.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Li; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu; I-Te Lee
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  Subclinical atherosclerosis, cardiovascular health, and disease risk: is there a case for the Cardiovascular Health Index in the primary prevention population?

Authors:  Sarah S Singh; Courtney S Pilkerton; Carl D Shrader; Stephanie J Frisbee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Combination of the ankle-brachial index and percentage of mean arterial pressure to improve diagnostic sensitivity for peripheral artery disease: An observational study.

Authors:  Han-Wei Lin; I-Te Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.