Literature DB >> 27182204

A Practical Approach to Quantitative Processing and Analysis of Small Biological Structures by Fluorescent Imaging.

Crystal M Noller1, Maria Boulina2, George McNamara3, Angela Szeto1, Philip M McCabe1, Armando J Mendez4.   

Abstract

Standards in quantitative fluorescent imaging are vaguely recognized and receive insufficient discussion. A common best practice is to acquire images at Nyquist rate, where highest signal frequency is assumed to be the highest obtainable resolution of the imaging system. However, this particular standard is set to insure that all obtainable information is being collected. The objective of the current study was to demonstrate that for quantification purposes, these correctly set acquisition rates can be redundant; instead, linear size of the objects of interest can be used to calculate sufficient information density in the image. We describe optimized image acquisition parameters and unbiased methods for processing and quantification of medium-size cellular structures. Sections of rabbit aortas were immunohistochemically stained to identify and quantify sympathetic varicosities, >2 μm in diameter. Images were processed to reduce background noise and segment objects using free, open-access software. Calculations of the optimal sampling rate for the experiment were based on the size of the objects of interest. The effect of differing sampling rates and processing techniques on object quantification was demonstrated. Oversampling led to a substantial increase in file size, whereas undersampling hindered reliable quantification. Quantification of raw and incorrectly processed images generated false structures, misrepresenting the underlying data. The current study emphasizes the importance of defining image-acquisition parameters based on the structure(s) of interest. The proposed postacquisition processing steps effectively removed background and noise, allowed for reliable quantification, and eliminated user bias. This customizable, reliable method for background subtraction and structure quantification provides a reproducible tool for researchers across biologic disciplines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  background processing; fluorescence image; quantifiable image acquisition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27182204      PMCID: PMC4866578          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.16-2703-001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  20 in total

1.  A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy.

Authors:  S Bolte; F P Cordelières
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Quantification and its applications in fluorescent microscopy imaging.

Authors:  Nicholas Hamilton
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.215

Review 3.  Ultrastructure of sympathetic axons and their structural relationship with vascular smooth muscle.

Authors:  S E Luff
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1996-06

4.  The quest for quantitative microscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Quantitative confocal microscopy: beyond a pretty picture.

Authors:  James Jonkman; Claire M Brown; Richard W Cole
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.441

6.  Pontamine sky blue: a counterstain for background autofluorescence in fluorescence and immunofluorescence histochemistry.

Authors:  T Cowen; A J Haven; G Burnstock
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1985

7.  Probabilistic secretion of quanta from visualized sympathetic nerve varicosities in mouse vas deferens.

Authors:  N A Lavidis; M R Bennett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Reduction of background autofluorescence in brain sections following immersion in sodium borohydride.

Authors:  B Clancy; L J Cauller
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  User-friendly tools for quantifying the dynamics of cellular morphology and intracellular protein clusters.

Authors:  Denis Tsygankov; Pei-Hsuan Chu; Hsin Chen; Timothy C Elston; Klaus M Hahn
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.441

10.  Extracting meaning from biological imaging data.

Authors:  Andrew R Cohen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of the Combination of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Nanofiber-Hydrogel Composite on Repair of the Contused Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Agnes E Haggerty; Ines Maldonado-Lasunción; Yohshiro Nitobe; Kentaro Yamane; Megan M Marlow; Hua You; Chi Zhang; Brian Cho; Xiaowei Li; Sashank Reddy; Hai-Quan Mao; Martin Oudega
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  DEFiNE: A Method for Enhancement and Quantification of Fluorescently Labeled Axons.

Authors:  Jeanne M Powell; Nicholas W Plummer; Erica L Scappini; Charles J Tucker; Patricia Jensen
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.856

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.