Literature DB >> 27181821

Staging of prostatic carcinoma at 1.5-T MRI: correlation of a simplified MRI exam with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens.

Andries Van Holsbeeck1, Annemarie Degroote2, Liesbeth De Wever1, Els Vanhoutte1, Frederik De Keyzer1, Hendrik Van Poppel3, Raymond Oyen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the accuracy of simplified multiparametric MRI at 1.5 T for local staging by using whole-mount-section histopathological analysis as the standard of reference.
METHODS: 123 consecutive patients underwent T2 weighted, T1 weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI without endorectal coil prior to radical prostatectomy. The accuracy of predicting extracapsular extension (ECE) (T3a) was assessed using direct signs or the combination of direct and indirect signs of extraprostatic extension. The accuracy of predicting seminal vesicle invasion (T3b) was evaluated, taking into account different routes of seminal vesicle involvement. Finally, adjacent organ invasion (T4) was evaluated in this patient population.
RESULTS: Histopathology showed T3a, T3b and T4 in 61, 28 and 9 cases, respectively. The use of direct signs of extraprostatic extension showed a sensitivity of 57.4% and specificity of 91.9%. The combination of direct signs and indirect signs improved sensitivity (85.2%) at the expense of moderate loss of specificity (83.9%). MR sensitivity for the detection of seminal vesicle invasion was low (53.6%); however, it was dependent on the route of seminal vesicle tumour infiltration. MR sensitivity and specificity for adjacent organ invasion were 88.9% and 99.1%.
CONCLUSION: Simplified MRI study at 1.5 T provides a relatively high sensitivity for detecting ECE (T3a) when using the combination of indirect and direct signs. However, this high sensitivity reading is at the cost of a moderate loss of specificity. Invasion of the seminal vesicles (T3b) occurs most often along the ejaculatory duct complex with low MR sensitivity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Simplified MRI study at 1.5 T without endorectal coil could be used for the local T staging of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27181821      PMCID: PMC5257323          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

Review 1.  Local staging of prostate cancer with MRI.

Authors:  Fatma Nur Soylu; Scott Eggener; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging determined tumor contact length for extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard Baco; Erik Rud; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Aud Svindland; Heidi B Eggesbø; Andrew J Hung; Toru Matsugasumi; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Inderbir S Gill; Osamu Ukimura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Seminal vesicle invasion: accuracy and analysis of infiltration patterns with high-spatial resolution T2-weighted sequences on endorectal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M Roethke; S Kaufmann; M Kniess; D Ketelsen; C D Claussen; H P Schlemmer; A Stenzl; D Schilling
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Daniel Dicker; Amanda Pain; Hannah Hamavid; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Michael F MacIntyre; Christine Allen; Gillian Hansen; Rachel Woodbrook; Charles Wolfe; Randah R Hamadeh; Ami Moore; Andrea Werdecker; Bradford D Gessner; Braden Te Ao; Brian McMahon; Chante Karimkhani; Chuanhua Yu; Graham S Cooke; David C Schwebel; David O Carpenter; David M Pereira; Denis Nash; Dhruv S Kazi; Diego De Leo; Dietrich Plass; Kingsley N Ukwaja; George D Thurston; Kim Yun Jin; Edgar P Simard; Edward Mills; Eun-Kee Park; Ferrán Catalá-López; Gabrielle deVeber; Carolyn Gotay; Gulfaraz Khan; H Dean Hosgood; Itamar S Santos; Janet L Leasher; Jasvinder Singh; James Leigh; Jost B Jonas; Jost Jonas; Juan Sanabria; Justin Beardsley; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Ken Takahashi; Richard C Franklin; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Luigi Naldi; Marcello Tonelli; Johanna Geleijnse; Max Petzold; Mark G Shrime; Mustafa Younis; Naohiro Yonemoto; Nicholas Breitborde; Paul Yip; Farshad Pourmalek; Paulo A Lotufo; Alireza Esteghamati; Graeme J Hankey; Raghib Ali; Raimundas Lunevicius; Reza Malekzadeh; Robert Dellavalle; Robert Weintraub; Robyn Lucas; Roderick Hay; David Rojas-Rueda; Ronny Westerman; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Sandra Nolte; Scott Patten; Scott Weichenthal; Semaw Ferede Abera; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Ivy Shiue; Tim Driscoll; Tommi Vasankari; Ubai Alsharif; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Vasiliy V Vlassov; W S Marcenes; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Yuichiro Yano; Al Artaman; Ismael Campos; Jennifer MacLachlan; Ulrich Mueller; Daniel Kim; Matias Trillini; Babak Eshrati; Hywel C Williams; Kenji Shibuya; Rakhi Dandona; Kinnari Murthy; Benjamin Cowie; Azmeraw T Amare; Carl Abelardo Antonio; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Coen H van Gool; Francesco Violante; In-Hwan Oh; Kedede Deribe; Kjetil Soreide; Luke Knibbs; Maia Kereselidze; Mark Green; Rosario Cardenas; Nobhojit Roy; Taavi Tillmann; Taavi Tillman; Yongmei Li; Hans Krueger; Lorenzo Monasta; Subhojit Dey; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; G Anil Kumar; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Lalit Dandona; Haidong Wang; Stein Emil Vollset; Ali Mokdad; Joshua A Salomon; Rafael Lozano; Theo Vos; Mohammad Forouzanfar; Alan Lopez; Christopher Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 5.  Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Michael A Jacobs; Riham El-Khouli; Dan Stoianovici; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  Pathways of lymphatic spread in male urogenital pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Blanca Paño; Carmen Sebastià; Laura Buñesch; Judit Mestres; Rafael Salvador; Napoleón G Macías; Carlos Nicolau
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Endorectal 3D T2-weighted 1mm-slice thickness MRI for prostate cancer staging at 1.5Tesla: should we reconsider the indirects signs of extracapsular extension according to the D'Amico tumor risk criteria?

Authors:  F Cornud; M Rouanne; F Beuvon; D Eiss; T Flam; M Liberatore; M Zerbib; N B Delongchamps
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI as a predictor of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park; Jung Jae Park; Byung Kwan Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The mechanisms and prognostic significance of seminal vesicle involvement by prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Ohori; P T Scardino; S L Lapin; C Seale-Hawkins; J Link; T M Wheeler
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Transition zone prostate cancer: incremental value of diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging in tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Sung Il Jung; Olivio F Donati; Hebert A Vargas; Debra Goldman; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multi-parametric MRI of the prostate: Factors predicting extracapsular extension at the time of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Gaunay; Vinay Patel; Paras Shah; Daniel Moreira; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Eran Ben-Levi; Robert Villani; Manish A Vira
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2016-11-19

2.  The Diagnostic Performance of the Length of Tumor Capsular Contact on MRI for Detecting Prostate Cancer Extraprostatic Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tae Hyung Kim; Sungmin Woo; Sangwon Han; Chong Hyun Suh; Soleen Ghafoor; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.