BACKGROUND: In the unsalvageable, infected total knee arthroplasty, knee arthrodesis is one treatment option with lower reported reinfection rates compared with repeated 2-stage revision and improved function compared with amputation. One possible method for reducing incidence of recurrent infection treated by arthrodesis is the use of a silver-coated implant. We report our experience of silver-coated arthrodesis nails used for managing infected revision arthroplasty. We primarily assess the rate of reinfection and rate of amputation and report functional outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing knee arthrodesis with a silver-coated arthrodesis nail between 2008 and 2014. Patient-reported data were recorded prearthrodesis and postarthrodesis (Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36) as well as evidence of recurrent of infection, subsequent surgery, and the necessity for amputation. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent arthrodesis using the silver-coated arthrodesis nail. Mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (5-35 months). At the point of follow-up, there were no amputations, deaths, or implant revisions. One case of recurrent infection was successfully treated with washout and debridement. The mean prearthrodesis and postarthrodesis Oxford Knee Score difference was +8.9 points (P = .086) with significantly improved pain (P = .019), night pain (P = .021), and ease of standing (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Arthrodesis of the knee using a silver-coated intramedullary device is successful in eradicating infection and allowing limb conservation. Where infection does recur, this can be successfully treated with implant retention. The use of a silver-coated arthrodesis nail should be considered as an alternative to amputation for patients with a multiply revised and infected total knee arthroplasty.
BACKGROUND: In the unsalvageable, infected total knee arthroplasty, knee arthrodesis is one treatment option with lower reported reinfection rates compared with repeated 2-stage revision and improved function compared with amputation. One possible method for reducing incidence of recurrent infection treated by arthrodesis is the use of a silver-coated implant. We report our experience of silver-coated arthrodesis nails used for managing infected revision arthroplasty. We primarily assess the rate of reinfection and rate of amputation and report functional outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing knee arthrodesis with a silver-coated arthrodesis nail between 2008 and 2014. Patient-reported data were recorded prearthrodesis and postarthrodesis (Oxford Knee Score and Short Form-36) as well as evidence of recurrent of infection, subsequent surgery, and the necessity for amputation. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent arthrodesis using the silver-coated arthrodesis nail. Mean duration of follow-up was 16 months (5-35 months). At the point of follow-up, there were no amputations, deaths, or implant revisions. One case of recurrent infection was successfully treated with washout and debridement. The mean prearthrodesis and postarthrodesis Oxford Knee Score difference was +8.9 points (P = .086) with significantly improved pain (P = .019), night pain (P = .021), and ease of standing (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Arthrodesis of the knee using a silver-coated intramedullary device is successful in eradicating infection and allowing limb conservation. Where infection does recur, this can be successfully treated with implant retention. The use of a silver-coated arthrodesis nail should be considered as an alternative to amputation for patients with a multiply revised and infected total knee arthroplasty.
Authors: Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Arne Streitbuerger; Georg Gosheger; Friedrich Boettner; Markus Nottrott; Helmut Ahrens; Ralf Dieckmann; Wiebke Guder; Dimosthenis Andreou; Gregor Hauschild; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Wenzel Waldstein; Jendrik Hardes Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2017-03-06