Literature DB >> 27181456

Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Stéphane Gaudry1, David Hajage1, Fréderique Schortgen1, Laurent Martin-Lefevre1, Bertrand Pons1, Eric Boulet1, Alexandre Boyer1, Guillaume Chevrel1, Nicolas Lerolle1, Dorothée Carpentier1, Nicolas de Prost1, Alexandre Lautrette1, Anne Bretagnol1, Julien Mayaux1, Saad Nseir1, Bruno Megarbane1, Marina Thirion1, Jean-Marie Forel1, Julien Maizel1, Hodane Yonis1, Philippe Markowicz1, Guillaume Thiery1, Florence Tubach1, Jean-Damien Ricard1, Didier Dreyfuss1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients who have acute kidney injury but no potentially life-threatening complication directly related to renal failure is a subject of debate.
METHODS: In this multicenter randomized trial, we assigned patients with severe acute kidney injury (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes [KDIGO] classification, stage 3 [stages range from 1 to 3, with higher stages indicating more severe kidney injury]) who required mechanical ventilation, catecholamine infusion, or both and did not have a potentially life-threatening complication directly related to renal failure to either an early or a delayed strategy of renal-replacement therapy. With the early strategy, renal-replacement therapy was started immediately after randomization. With the delayed strategy, renal-replacement therapy was initiated if at least one of the following criteria was met: severe hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, pulmonary edema, blood urea nitrogen level higher than 112 mg per deciliter, or oliguria for more than 72 hours after randomization. The primary outcome was overall survival at day 60.
RESULTS: A total of 620 patients underwent randomization. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality at day 60 did not differ significantly between the early and delayed strategies; 150 deaths occurred among 311 patients in the early-strategy group (48.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42.6 to 53.8), and 153 deaths occurred among 308 patients in the delayed-strategy group (49.7%, 95% CI, 43.8 to 55.0; P=0.79). A total of 151 patients (49%) in the delayed-strategy group did not receive renal-replacement therapy. The rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections was higher in the early-strategy group than in the delayed-strategy group (10% vs. 5%, P=0.03). Diuresis, a marker of improved kidney function, occurred earlier in the delayed-strategy group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In a trial involving critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury, we found no significant difference with regard to mortality between an early and a delayed strategy for the initiation of renal-replacement therapy. A delayed strategy averted the need for renal-replacement therapy in an appreciable number of patients. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01932190.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27181456     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  248 in total

Review 1.  Changes in acute blood purification therapy in critical care: republication of the article published in the Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs.

Authors:  Taka-Aki Nakada; Shigeto Oda; Ryuzo Abe; Noriyuki Hattori
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  [Focus on nephrology : Intensive medical care studies from 2018-2019].

Authors:  C Nusshag; C Beynon; M Dietrich; A Hecker; C Jungk; D Michalski; K Schmidt; M A Weigand; C J Reuß; M Bernhard; T Brenner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  IDEAL-ICU in Context.

Authors:  David E Leaf; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  No "optimal timing" of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

Review 5.  The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.

Authors:  Kent Doi; Osamu Nishida; Takashi Shigematsu; Tomohito Sadahiro; Noritomo Itami; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yukio Yuzawa; Hirokazu Okada; Daisuke Koya; Hideyasu Kiyomoto; Yugo Shibagaki; Kenichi Matsuda; Akihiko Kato; Terumasa Hayashi; Tomonari Ogawa; Tatsuo Tsukamoto; Eisei Noiri; Shigeo Negi; Koichi Kamei; Hirotsugu Kitayama; Naoki Kashihara; Toshiki Moriyama; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 6.  Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  [Metabolic management and nutrition in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN, and DIVI].

Authors:  W Druml; M Joannidis; S John; A Jörres; M Schmitz; J Kielstein; D Kindgen-Milles; M Oppert; V Schwenger; C Willam; A Zarbock
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 8.  Discontinuation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury: predictive factors of renal function recovery.

Authors:  Helmut Schiffl
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  [Extracorporeal renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury : Recommendations from the renal section of the DGIIN, ÖGIAIN and DIVI].

Authors:  V Schwenger; D Kindgen-Milles; C Willam; A Jörres; W Druml; D Czock; S J Klein; M Oppert; M Schmitz; J T Kielstein; A Zarbock; M Joannidis; S John
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  Efficacy and prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy at different times in the treatment of patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Na An; Ruman Chen; Yafei Bai; Mingzhi Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.